Let’s work together to solve bison management challenge
By Glenn Hockett, New West Unfiltered 2-18-08
As a hunter I remain optimistic we can and will solve the current bison management challenge. Irrational government harassment, hazing, capture and slaughter of bison within and near the boundaries of Yellowstone National Park is neither economically or ecologically sustainable. This subsidized house of cards will eventually fall.
A growing and diverse constituency has shared many win-win economically efficient and ecologically sustainable ideas with policy makers and the 5 agency members of the interagency bison management planning team. One simple idea to avoid this needless slaughter includes fencing to protect the few cattle that occur along the bison migration corridors in the Upper Yellowstone and Upper Madison Valleys. The points of conflict are small and manageable, while the solutions are of a landscape scale, habitat based and efficiently and respectfully sustainable.
People are learning that hundreds of thousands of acres of conflict-free habitat are already owned by the public in the Upper Yellowstone, Gallatin and Madison valleys. Places such as Cedar Creek, the OTO and the Dome Mountain Wildlife Management Area in the Upper Yellowstone Valley - Public lands all specifically purchased for big game habitat. Furthermore, there are hundreds of thousands of acres of historic and conflict-free bison habitat both within and outside the Park in the Upper Gallatin Basin framed by the magnificent Taylor Fork watershed and the Porcupine or Gallatin Wildlife Management Area.
If bison must be captured to prevent commingling with a few susceptible cattle in the Yellowstone or Madison Basins then let’s transport them to the public land winter ranges in either Teepee or Dailey Creek within the Upper Gallatin watershed where there are never any cattle. This is an excellent alternative to the needless government slaughter the Department of Livestock (DOL), the Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) and now the Park Service are relentlessly waging on this critically important gene pool of wild bison.
Increasingly, the public is becoming aware and sincerely disturbed by the ongoing dealings of the DOL, APHIS and more recently the Park Service. As well, the politicians who federally earmark the funding which feeds these wasteful capture and slaughter operations are being exposed (Formerly Senator Conrad Burns and now Senator’s Max Baucus and Jon Tester in Montana). Will “diseased” elk be the next big game species harassed, captured and relentlessly sent to slaughter by DOL, APHIS and the Park Service and the policy makers who needlessly fund their budgets for such activities?
Instead, let’s instruct the policy makers and cooperating agencies to immediately begin fencing projects to protect the few pastures being used by susceptible cattle in the Upper Yellowstone and Madison basins. As well, we know too much not to encourage or just allow bison movements to conflict-free habitat areas on both public and bison friendly private property outside the Park where sufficient forage is currently available to sustain a spectacular restoration and conservation effort that will be envied by the world.
Win-win cost effective solutions abound. We can work together to protect a few cattle while respecting and protecting public and private property rights on both sides of the issue, thus allowing the bison, like other wildlife in the area, to access the conflict-free habitat that exists today. The current “Plan” and its supporters are living in a house of cards that will eventually crumble due to the forces of nature and an increasingly informed public.
Glenn Hockett is Volunteer President of the Gallatin Wildlife Association, a regional sportsmen’s group in Bozeman Montana
Comments
You should be ashamed of yourself for proposing something sensible ... Only Craig Moore and Marion know what's best for the buffalo ... Can't have those critters on public lands! Yikes, what a horrible solution after all the money we've spent for habitat. You know the livestock prostitutes have claimed our public lands and pay us generously ... $1.23 per cow/calf pair per month. What would we do without their generous income?
Just another normal day in buffalo land when the park service, even on a Federal holiday, sends 100+ buffalo to slaughter. Maybe they thought we'd be kicking back and not watching, heh?
As always Glenn, you just make too much sense :)
barb
>>>>>>>>>
By Craig Moore, 12-10-07
David, part of the problem is definitional. What is 'wild' in the context of the IBMP? Genetic purity? Free roaming without ever encountering fixtures of human habitation? Free roaming within a minimum of X amount of acreage?
Robert, in my opinion, on issues like this economics lead the politics. When bison economics outshine cattle, then the politics and the agencies which are the enforcing arms of those politics will follow. This battle between cattle and bison will continue with predictable results until such times as ranchers are not threatened.
Let's have some free thinking, tabula raza. Look at what Turner is doing. He has very large spreads where bison roam 'wild,' the herd is culled and commercially harvested, and there is some hunting. What if adjacent ranchers in the bison areas could be convinced to join a Bison Inc. that would follow Turner's model to some degree? The ranchers would receive payments, similar to CRP payments, from the profits to replace their cattle profits? The Bison Inc. animals would have free roaming within Bison Inc. territory clear back to Yellowstone. The hunting public would be bought into the process through Block Management that had specific access times and harvest regulations. Just some thoughts. It is not a matter of being ideologically pure or right. A solution has to be effective and have stakeholders on the same side.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
I still think that the politics will follow the economics. By the way, barb, you also posted on that column.
and Craig, I am not interested in your money-profit based solutions to bison management ... in Montana, we have already outlawed new elk game farms and don't allow shooting on those that still exist ... as citizens, we have already paid for habitat for wildlife, particularly winter range ... only bison are not allowed on our public lands ... shameful.
barb in west yellowstone
Lobbyists are strongarming legislators to maintain their lifestyle --
And who is paying the ULTIMATE COST so these primma donnas can maintain their lifestyles?
Our predatory animals are and have been -- 100,000 mammals are killed JUST by "Wildlife Services" every year on behalf of this Mafia industry!
(I am not the same Barb)