Missoula explosion victim’s dying wishes not honored
By FuMa, New West Unfiltered 3-28-07
Myself alond with hundreds of others investigated the scene after being jolted by the sound of the explosion. Thankfully took our time walking to the plume of smoke so as not to witness the vicitm who was apparently burnt on 3/4 of his body. This was a tragic event but the rush to help this man oversteped a key boundary. It seems he was refusing care, aware of his fate, but was still evacuated and flown to another state to die. Was this a case of injustice by those who were administering care? I was not there, thankfully and would never want to be in that situation, however, the issue of patient concent seems to have been ignored.
Comments
Mainly I had an emotional response to the quote
from the Missoulian...
"The man was coherent enough to give out his wife’s cell phone number, but he pleaded with them to let him die, Stokes said."
The following day it was reported that he had died after being flown away.
The victim seemed to be accepting his own fate and was denied of the peace of dying near to his family and home, according to the Missoulaina article. Thank you for clarifying.
This brings up an interesting moral question however, if you are in a accident and do not know the possible medical outcome, (and are presumably in a state of shock), should those first responders honor your wishes to refuse medical help?