The Destruction of Afghan Cultural Treasures

New West Unfiltered By Nick Gier, New West Unfiltered 3-27-09

THE DESTRUCTION OF AFGHAN CULTURAL TREASURES

By Nick Gier

Eight years ago this month the Taliban demolished two giant Buddha statues in Afghanistan's Bamiyan Valley. The international community condemned the act, and the 57-member Organization of the Islamic Conference joined in the outrage.

Initially, Mohammed Omar, the Taliban leader, promised that he would preserve the monuments, the largest standing Buddhas in the world (one 174 feet; the other 125 feet). Omar was overruled by radical clerics who insisted that the statues were religious idols and had to be destroyed under Islamic law.

Alexander the Great left administrators and artists in the wake of his conquests in this region then known as Bactria. It was the descendants of Greek artists who convinced their Buddhist students to violate their guru's prohibition of depicting his person. The result was the stunning Gandhara school of Buddhist art, distinctive for the deep Greco-Roman folds in the clothing.

During the 7th Century AD the Bamiyan Valley was home to ten monasteries and over 1,000 monks. Many of the monks lived as hermits in caves in the cliffs where the statues were chiseled out of solid rock. The elaborate cave art is the first ever painted with oils, six centuries before Europeans perfected this medium.

In the 11th Century Muslim armies on their way to conquer India tried to destroy the statues, but they did not have the technology to do it. The artillery of the Nadar Shah (1698-1744), sometimes known as the Persian Napoleon, did damage them, but could not bring them down. The Taliban bombarded and dynamited the cliffs for a month before the deed was done.

When the Taliban came to power in 1996, the National Museum in Kabul, built by King Amanullah in 1922, was destroyed. Specific targets were images of the Buddha, which could have fetched good prices on the black market. The Taliban, however, were not interested in money; rather, they were intent on eradicating all traces of what they consider an idolatrous religion.

Last November I saw the Bactrian Gold exhibit at the Asian Art Museum in San Francisco. It was once feared that these incredible treasures, intricate gold necklaces, bowls, and amulets from 2,200 BC to 200 AD, had either been taken off to Moscow by the Soviets during their invasion of the 1980s or had been melted down by jihadists to buy arms.

It turned out that director of the Kabul Museum had secretly sealed them in a vault in the Central Bank in 1989. The safe was drilled opened in 2004 and the Bactrian Gold is now on a triumphant world tour. The new government in Kabul sees this as a chance to reposition Afghanistan as the seat of great civilizations rather than a country known for opium production and radical Muslims.

There were Buddhist centers of learning in ancient Pakistan, and, although the modern nation is 95 percent Muslim, the government has proudly preserved its Buddhist heritage. The current regime, however, has allowed the Taliban to impose shari'ah law in the Swat Valley, and a museum built for Buddhist artifacts was recently bombed by Muslim militants and 150 objects were destroyed.

With all this in mind, I am really torn about our current policy in Afghanistan. The Taliban has increased their control of the country from 50 percent in 2007 to 70 percent last year. Kabul is now essentially surrounded and militant attacks in the city have increased 35 percent over 2007.

President Obama has sent 17,000 more Marines to Afghanistan, even when he himself knows that military force alone will not solve the problems. In fact, a greater military presence will lead to more civilian casualties. Civilian deaths were up 40 percent from those in 2007, one half caused by coalition forces.

The Obama administration has said that it is open to the possibility of a negotiated settlement with the Taliban. The problem with a diplomatic solution is whether or not we can trust them, and the experience in the Swat Valley demonstrates that we cannot.

I agree with the editors of the New York Times: "We are deeply skeptical that there is any deal to be cut with the Taliban leaders, who . . . would undoubtedly insist on reimposing their repressive, medieval ways, including denying education and medical care to women."

I would simply add the real possibility that the Taliban would finish the destruction of Afghanistan's cultural treasures, and they would definitely block the Japanese and Swiss efforts to reconstruct the Bamiyan Buddhas.

Nick Gier taught religion and philosophy at the University of Idaho for 31 years. Read or listen to all of his columns at www.NickGier.com.

Comments

"When the Taliban came to power in 1996, the National Museum in Kabul, built by King Amanullah in 1922, was destroyed."

Very wrong information given here. Taliban are of course ignorant and anti-culture people, but the Kabul Museum was not destroyed by them, but it was changed into ashes during the infighting of fundamentalist warlords before coming of the Taliban in power. They were forces of Burhanuddin Rabbani, Rasul Sayyaf, Abdul Ali Mazari, Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, Ahmad Shah Massoud, Rashid Dostum, and others who not only looted 70% of the over 100,000 pieces of the treasures from the Museum but also destroyed it by bomb and rockets.
The article "The pillage of Kabul Museum" published in the Weekend Post (October 21,1994), gives the real account of what happened to the Kabul museum between 1992-94.

http://www.rawa.org/museum.html

As seen here, the Kabul museum was destroyed before 1994 and not after 1996 when Taliban came to power. But the biggest reason and crime of the Taliban was to destroy the Buddhas of Bamyan.
I thanks these gentlemen for their correction. Using their information I have inserted a new paragraph in the web version of this column. I will also correct this if needed.

"Before the Taliban came to power in 1996, the National Museum in Kabul, built by King Amanullah in 1922, had already been destroyed by other mujahideen. Thousands of artifacts were sold on the black market with Pakistan (Peshawar in particular) serving as a transhipment point. On August 6, 1995 the Pakistani government appropriated 30 million rupees to buy up these items, and there is no doubt that many of them were resold at a profit, in obvious violation of international law, to private dealers."
While it's laudable to decry the destruction of Buddhist icons it's apparently de rigeur, at least at New West, to skewer Christian tenets of faith. Truly monumental hypocrisy.

Your Comment

Comment policy:

NewWest.Net encourages robust and lively, but civil participation from our readers. By posting here, you agree to the NewWest.Net terms of service. You agree to keep your comments on topic, respectful and free of gratuitous profanity. Contributions that engage in personal attacks, racism, bigotry, hatred or are otherwise patently offensive will be subject to removal.

Other than using a filter that scans for comment spam, we do not moderate contributions before they are posted and we do not review every thread, so we ask that you help us in keeping the discussions civil and appropriate. Please email info@newwest.net to notify us of comments that may violate these guidelines. Thanks for your help and cooperation. Click here for some tips on how to best interact on NewWest.Net.

Name

Email

Remember my name and email address.

Notify me of follow-up comments.

New West

New West Unfiltered
The Letters section is your chance to share your thoughts and speak your mind.

TargetRead the Letters posting instructions.

TargetSubmit an Letter to New West Network Topics.