book review

A Perspective on the Russian Experience with Wolves


By Peter Metcalf, 7-19-08

 
 

In 1965 an American working for the National Security Agency as a Russian linguist picked up a copy of Farley Mowat’s Never Cry Wolf. Instead of a new found appreciation for the contentious canids, as Mowat’s book generated for so many of his generation, Will Graves found the book didn’t mesh with what he knew from 14 years of reading about wolves in Russia.

“His book is fiction,” Graves said Thursday over coffee in Missoula, taking particular aim at Mowat’s claim that in the far north rodents and small game comprise substantial parts of a wolf’s diet.

Alarmed by not just Mowat’s book, but what Graves perceived to be a trend of often inaccurate and misleading pro-wolf Western literature, Graves decided to set the record straight with a book of his own. Over the next 42 years, he meticulously clipped Russian-language news reports, translated popular and scientific articles, joined preeminent Russian biologists at international conferences on wolves, and traveled and talked with Russian biologists, game managers and hunters about the Russian experience with wolves. 

His findings are collected in his recently released book, Wolves in Russia: Anxiety Through the Ages. The book chronicles the impact of wolves on ordinary Russians from the 19th century Czarist period up to the years immediately following the collapse of the Soviet Union, in an attempt to refute a number of widely-held misconceptions about wolves in North America. 

Using copious statistics and brief anecdotes gleaned primarily from government archives, newspapers and the Soviet-era magazine Hunting and Game Management, Graves catalogs stories of Russian villagers attacked or killed by wolves, extensive livestock depredations, wolf population trends and various government control programs. 

Along the way the author argues that wolves are “lustful” and “bloodthirsty,” “wanton killers” who will, under the right circumstances—such as with a flock of sheep or when teaching their young to hunt—kill excessive amounts of prey at one time. Wolves routinely kill healthy, adult animals, kill more ungulates than human hunters harvest, and drive down ungulate populations in an area to unsustainable levels. Such behavior, Graves argues, threatens the nutrition, livelihoods and economics of many Russian people and necessitates strong human intervention to bring wolf populations under control and restore a balance to nature. 

Most disconcerting for Graves, however, is the potential for far-ranging wolves to spread parasites and diseases to other wildlife. These parasites can cause ungulates and cattle to abort and are potentially harmful to people, yet few people know about this threat, Graves said. 

While such extensive information provides a unique insight into Russians experience with wolves, the book’s credibility suffers from a severe lack of context, a predilection to conjecture and a tendency to generalized conclusions from singular or unconnected examples.

Notably the book lacks mention of people who view wolves in a positive light, because, Graves told me, when he talked to such people it was obvious they didn’t know anything about wolves. Also, for a book on wolves in Russia, there is precious little substantive discussion of wolf biology or ecology. Such omissions reduce the animal and its relationship to humans from a rich complexity to a singular animosity and is highly disappointing in a book that claims to provide “just the facts.”

Still, for people looking for statistics and anecdotes to support the reality that wolves can and have harmed humans both physically and economically, Graves book will be a welcomed read. 

Graves will be signing copies of his book at Fact and Fiction in Missoula on Monday, July 21st from 5:00 – 7:00 p.m.



Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.

Read more Books & Writers stories
Advertisement

Comments

no thanks
It is in that general area that the werewolves hang out as well, I think. I suspect Will Graves' information parallels that paradigm pretty closely...
Wolves spread parasites to other animlas? All animals spread parasites to other animals, including ungulates. Wolves kill more ungulates that hunters? Of course and as well they should. Wolves can't exactly go to the grocery store.
This is ludicrous. Graves has no personal credibility, no evidence that he has devoted any significant effort to any actual scientific study, and his sources are the Soviet equivalent of Jerry Springer or the National Enquirer. He can't be so stupid as to think that those sources are scientific or even remotely trustworthy; like most everything from Soviet-era sources, they were dutifully written and carefully skewed to reflect the views of the bureaucrat in charge at the time. Graves must know the truth, but wrote his nonsense anyway, which would appear to make him nothing more than another crusty grifter looking to pad his retirement. He aimed it at his audience; Craig Moore, Marion Dickinson, and the rest of the suckers will surely be buying multiple copies as gifts.
I'm going to try and read the book. It is important to know both sides of the issue. Also the wolves in North America and the wolves in Europe are very different. That fact should be addressed and never forgotten. Also the book is fiction unlike "Never Cry Wolf" which was non-fiction. Farley Mowat was highered by anti-wolf people to produce anti-wolf information. The fact that he was highered to do thing and did another because there was no evidence of ungulate deprivation is proof that he recorded what he saw. A similar study was conducted in North Idaho and it was shown that the wolves main prey was rabbit not ungulates.
Wolves, like, most predatory animals eat what is most readily available. People like Graves write what they think will sell. People buy and read what matches their prejudices...
Pravda's got some great shark stories too... According to most I've seen, white sharks consist of a largely human diet.
Have you folks read the book? I have and he provides documentation. I have found that reading a book before critiquing it give a little more credence to your opinions.
BINGO! I knew they'd show up sooner or later.
I would add that one of the great scams in non-fiction is enormous bibliographies. Overwhelm the critics with sources. That way you can just point to your 50 pages (or whatever) of citations. Of course, Mike had a great point earlier which, if I might paraphrase, is that it is not the number of sources but the quality that is key to judging someones work. That is why one of the great burdens and responsibilities of reviewing books is the ability to check the veracity and quality of the sources used in a given non-fiction work.

Name

Email

Your Comment

Comment policy:

NewWest.Net encourages robust and lively, but civil participation from our readers. By posting here, you agree to the NewWest.Net terms of service. You agree to keep your comments on topic, respectful and free of gratuitous profanity. Contributions that engage in personal attacks, racism, sexism, bigotry, hatred or are otherwise patently offensive will be subject to removal.

Other than using a filter that scans for comment spam, we do not moderate contributions before they are posted and we do not review every thread, so we ask that you help us in keeping the discussions civil and appropriate. Please email info@newwest.net to notify us of comments that may violate these guidelines. Thanks for your help and cooperation. Click here for some tips on how to best interact on NewWest.Net.

Remember my name and email address.

Notify me of follow-up comments.