Retailing
Big Boxes, Bigger Boxes, and Independent Businesses
By Jonathan Weber , 6-29-09
Last week I posted a piece about the closing of the downtown Missoula Starbucks, and expressed some ambivalance about the idea that locally owned versus chains was always a black-and-white issue. Today I came across a piece that takes a different kind of look at this issue, arguing that Walmart and Costco are killing the so-called category killer big boxes in product categories such as music, books, electronics, toys and more. (Hat tip to Roger Millar for the link). The story, by Stacy Mitchell, is on the Website of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, not a group I was previously familiar with, and it definitely has a point of view. But it makes some great points, and calls for more vigorous anti-trust enforcement on predatory pricing by the mega-retailers.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.





Comments
Add your comment below
I'm not as familiar with Missoula's shopping, but I find my dollars go further with indies in Bozeman. Locally-owned Town and Country beats the chains for grocery prices. Owenhouse Hardware and Kenyon Noble compete quite well against Lowes and Home Depot (the latter has a price match guarantee) and our locally-owned thrift stores typically offer better value than the shoddy housewares or clothing at the box chains.
Cheapness does not necessarily equal value or saving money. When I look at all the options and long-term costs, I usually conclude going local is the best option.
As for employment, the fact that the big box chains employ locals is both obvious and a distraction from the real question; do they increase or decrease NET employment. It's demonstrably the latter, for reasons I've written up here http://amiba.net/pdf/benefits_doing_biz_locally.pdf (PDF doc) based on numerous studies which are nicely summarized and compiled by the New Rules Project here: http://www.newrules.org/retail/key-studies-walmart-and-bigbox-retail
...