Salmon News Along The Columbia

Northwest Tribes Reach Historic Agreement


By Joseph Friedrichs, 4-07-08

An effort to save salmon in the Columbia River Basin reached a historic agreement as four tribes and the government found common ground.

According to Oregonlive.com, federal officials will announce that they have agreed to pay up to $1 billion for habitat improvements on the Columbia River and its tributaries, in exchange for Northwest tribes backing off a major lawsuit and supporting dam operations for at least a decade.

The agreement will, at least temporarily, slow down a long-running feud between dam operators and the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, a technical support and coordinating agency for three of the tribes in the agreeement.

However, because the agreement fails to meet many of the Commission’s previous demands, most specifically boosting water spills over dams for fish and the removal of Snake River dams, this is likely only another chapter in a fight dating back to the 1970s. 

Last month, Olney Patt Jr., the group’s executive director, told me the Commission, was formed during “a time of turmoil for the environment and the tribes,” when utilities built numerous dams and reckless irrigation practices formed.

It’s a tough call to say who came out ahead on today’s agreement. On the one hand, dam operators have at least a decade to keep working, with the added bonus of not having the Commission publicly criticizing them.

Then again, the Commission and their supporters now have a serious amount of money to put toward their accomplishing their goal, which is, after all, to protect Northwest salmon.

Editor’s note: The original posting of this article referred to the agreement as “silenced with a paycheck.” This was an inaccurate statement.



Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.

Like to receive our print magazine, The New West? Click here for free subscription information.

Read more Bend stories
Advertisement

Comments

Over and over again, though deflected by one nefarious scheme after another, the answer from a steady sequence of credible scientific studies after always seems to come back the same. Columbia salmon will not be viable as long as the damn dams remain in place. It is true that this money may have a beneficial effect, if it is used to eliminate the bad practices that depend on the dams and thus pave the way for removal of the dams at the end of the decade; however, it is also undeniable that the tribes were also motivated by the chance to run this money through their own jobs and contracting machinery. In my opinion, they should have more carefully considered the longer term potential value of the salmon, the risk of this further delay to the true native salmon strains, and the fact that, with political change on the horizon, this may be the one most reliable moment to NOT take a fall and NOT make a deal that holds the salmon at risk for another decade.
I believe the deal was for 900 million with some added perks, but who's counting?
So do you talk out of your carbon credits clean air side of your mouth when you demand taking out hydro power dams? Or do you talk out of the save the salmon and damn the air side of your mouth? The world, folks, is a giant bowl of compromise, except, of course, if you are one in five people in the world who is Chinese? China builds and puts into operation two coal fired electric plants per week. Their power use per unit of product has doubled in the last decade. They have fouled the air of the Pacific to the point that we are advised not to eat any larger fish for fear of coal emission mercury. They need power, not clean air, and you are not going to tell them what to do.

The salmon answer has to be technology based. To rid ourselves of that clean hydro power, with no upcoming nuclear or natural gas to replace it, will mean we go to our abundant coal resources to keep the air conditioning on in the arid, hot New West. And, if you have any idea of how to control ocean conditions, lots of fish biologists are interested, as that is the reason for very low runs last year, this year, and in the next two or three years. The catastrophe was in the ocean, not on the River.

Name

Email

Your Comment

Comment policy:

NewWest.Net encourages robust and lively, but civil participation from our readers. By posting here, you agree to the NewWest.Net terms of service. You agree to keep your comments on topic, respectful and free of gratuitous profanity. Contributions that engage in personal attacks, racism, bigotry, hatred or are otherwise patently offensive will be subject to removal.

Other than using a filter that scans for comment spam, we do not moderate contributions before they are posted and we do not review every thread, so we ask that you help us in keeping the discussions civil and appropriate. Please email info@newwest.net to notify us of comments that may violate these guidelines. Thanks for your help and cooperation. Click here for some tips on how to best interact on NewWest.Net.

Remember my name and email address.

Notify me of follow-up comments.