Bob Wire Has a Point (It's Under His Cowboy Hat)
Ralph Nader: Turd in the Campaign Punch Bowl
By Bob Wire, 2-26-08
In only 36 short weeks (longer than it takes some folks to gestate a whole baby), we’ll be electing a new president. Or, perhaps the Supreme Court will. Depends on what kind of mood Dick Cheney is in that day. I’m guessing grumpy.
When you stop to think about it, we’ve had some asshole from only two families in the White House for the last 20 years. And there’s a good chance that streak could stretch to 24. Personally, I think either Hillary or Obama would do a much better job at running the country than the current Corrupter-In-Chief, who has all the political acumen and presidential respectability of Barney Fife with a snootful of meth. As we all know, this election is the Democrats’ to lose. Which they, as a party, are plenty capable of doing.
But just to make sure it’s going to be a nail-biter, along comes Ralph Nader, like a herpes outbreak on prom night, to stick his dick in the mashed potatoes.
In 2000, I cut my very own smoky back-room deal with my brother-in-law Manny. He lives in Florida, and at the time was a staunch Naderite. Since Gore had about as much chance of carrying Montana as the Unabomber, I proposed a vote swap. I’d vote for Nader if Manny voted for Gore. A vote for Gore in Florida would carry much more weight (I naïvely thought at the time) than a Nader vote here, so it was a good deal. Well, I later found out that Manny voted for Nader anyway, violating the sacred trust required of a smoky back-room deal. I would have been supremely pissed, if I hadn’t gone ahead and voted for Gore.
But no one, even Ralph Nader, thought that Nader had a snowball’s chance in Vegas of winning that election. Would you want your cranky-ass grandmother in the Oval Office, constantly lecturing you about wearing your seatbelt and telling you to pull your pants up? Hell no. And neither did the rest of America. However, as we all know, this bad penny of a presidential candidate (who is less qualified than Pat Paulsen, who was once asked if he thought the voters were uninformed, or simply apathetic. His excellent response: “I don’t know, and I don’t care.”) swayed enough progressives and dreamers to shift their votes from Gore, allowing the election to be close enough for Bush’s army of deceitful neo-con vermin to call in enough markers to actually strongarm the highest court in the land.
Thank you, Ralph Nader. We all figured that you’d wait at least a couple of election cycles to emerge from beneath your rock of consumer advocacy before you pulled this shit again. Ralph, you know as well as I do that people in this country have short memories, and eight years is enough time to be distracted by a dozen Britney career arcs. But you’re getting on in years, and maybe your memory is even shorter than that of the national consciousness. But when the news of your entering the race causes millions of Americans to respond with a collective “oh, NO,” you can be sure you’ve made the wrong decision.
Nader is even older than McCain, who makes Ronald Reagan look like Zac Efron. At 74, Nader’s running out of chances to ruin elections. So I guess he doesn’t want to wait until he’s running his misguided campaign from the Alzheimer’s home. But hopefully, this time around, progressive and liberal voters will still be feeling the sting of 2000, when nearly half the country proved that they were ignorant enough to vote for a guy simply because he was less boring than Al Gore. I had never been more embarrassed by my fellow countrymen than after that election. Thirty million people managed to tune in to American Idol the night before, but they couldn’t be bothered to read a newspaper story or find anything on the internet about Bush/Cheney and their Halliburton/Gas & Awl Bidness motives.
So here we are today, paying three bucks and change for a gallon of gas, watching our debt-laden country slide into a recession while thousands of men and women serving in our military are dying in Iraq and Afghanistan so the Greedhead-In-Chief and his cronies can have a shot at the oil rights to line their already well-lined pockets. Nine-eleven retribution? Give me a lunch break. Most of those hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, a nation the Bush family has been cozy with since the days of Bush 41. Iraq wasn’t involved, no matter how much breast-beating blather emanated from the White House leading up to the invasion.
I like Hillary. But I’ve decided to vote for Barack. Of course, my vote will be canceled out thousands of times over just by the redneck idiots who choke on their Skoal because “Obama” rhymes with “Osama.” And I’m not voting for him simply because he’s black. He’s not black. Samuel L. Jackson is black. Barack is off-black, like Tiger Woods. But he’s smart, he’s cagey, and so far he’s shown that he’s tough enough to withstand the scrutiny, the petty meanness, and the sheer absurdity of a national presidential campaign.
Hillary is a tough broad, and a single withering look from her can do more damage than a chokehold from John McCain. But it’s time for some REAL change, not just a different Clinton or Bush. Jesus, I guess we should all be thankful that Jeb didn’t get his shit together in time for this one. I would bet that the Bush clan (led by Barbara, who’s even more fearsome than Hillary. Hell, she got herself on the dollar bill, didn’t she?) would find a way to sneak that son of a bitch in the back door.
I’ll admit that I don’t even know that much about Obama’s policies. But that’s largely because at this stage, no candidate can afford to be too specific or give any straight answers, lest they risk losing a single potential voter. That’s okay. I’m willing to let him enjoy a long honeymoon, and some on-the-job training.
So hopefully, by election day, Nader will have flamed out and/or faded away, so that we can funnel our faith into one candidate. I’d be happy with either Democrat, but the Demo’s have a history of fracturing under pressure and not being able to deliver the coup de gras. We don’t need Ralph Nader distracting ANY liberal or moderate voters with the shiny objects of outsiderism or unrealistic promises. Yes, our federal government is pretty much owned and run by corporate special interests. We let it happen. But that big ol’ dirty ship is going to take some time to turn around, and nothing short of a full-scale revolution and collapse of democracy will achieve this in the short run. Let’s start by sending the Republicans packing. They had their shot. They failed us spectacularly.
I can only hope that Nader will realize that he is a national joke, not a legitimate contender. The key will be for him to bow out in time for his supporters to grieve, and then come over to the light. Hey, if it will help, I’ll even volunteer to cop his joint in an airport men’s room.
I mean, come on, Ralph! Even Don Quixote wised up eventually.
[For more erudite, insightful political commentary, well, you might want to try the New York Times. Otherwise, check back with NewWest.net/BobWire frequently for more grab-bag writing.]
http://www.top-blogs.com/cgi-bin/rankem.cgi?id=ednor59
http://www.humor100.com/cgi-bin/rank/rankem.cgi?id=ednor59
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.





Comments
Add your comment below
Nader is either to be ignored as irrelevant, or a reassessment of Obama's campaign is in order.
Harvey King
Professional Cindy Sheehan AND Raph Nader basher
http://cindysuck.blogspot.com
Ha ha ha ha. Good one.
I respectfully and totally disagree with you on Nader, but then, I disagree with most everyone on Nader. I think he's not going to be fully appreciated until after he's dead and gone, at which point people will realize how selfless and principled he was.
So if Nader's the turd in the punch bowl, you gotta know it was full of crap anyway. I have to wonder if we really do have a real choice. Obama is strong on saying preacher stuff and terribly shy on details. Calling for change is hardly a plan. I lived this rhetoric with Eugene MacCarthy when just out of college. That was a waste. We got Nixon. Hillary is as bought and paid for as a candidate can be by the cover-all-the-bases establishment, well shaken down by Bill and their legion of camp followers. McCain is not only old, crippled, stained, but evidently possessing a nasty temper and off-stage demeanor. Not like most Senators aren't like that. I once visited the older of the Senate office buildings, and was looking at all the black walnut trimmed high doors, and the guy I was with said the doors had to be of that size to fit senatorial egos. So our choices are now down to 3 known quantities, none of which has anything of a great legislative record. And why should we expect them to? They all three have been running for President the whole time they have been in the Senate. Or as Lucky Jack Aubrey said, dining with his surgeon Dr. Maturin in "Master and Commander" ( the Russell Crowe acted movie), as the good surgeon watched bugs crawl in and out of their hard tack, Captain Aubrey asked him which one he would choose, and the surgeon said the large one from the family Curculionoidea, and the wine sodden Captain Aubrey slams his fist on the table and says "You should always choose the lesser of two weevils!" and laughs at his clever joke...I just guess that is how I have to vote. Nader is not the lesser of two evils, but the least viable of many weevils who have fed on the public hardtack for so long. The great weevils will be sorted out, and as usual, we will get to vote for the lesser of two weevils once again...and my apology to the late Patrick O'Brian who wrote so many fine, fine stories about Lucky Jack Aubrey....20 I believe. And every one a good read.
Bush and his administration are responsible for the deaths in Iraq, not Nader. And the Supreme Court allowed Bush to steal the White House - again, not Nader. He did play the role of spoiler, granted, but don't blame him for this administrations mistakes.
She makes Ron Paul and his supporters almost look rational.
I am very nervous about Obama wanting to sit down and talk with every bad guy in the world, but who knows maybe he can hypnotize them too with his great voice.
Nader has every right to run, this is the US. And the 2000 election was won, the vote was close but even with every new hound counting the ballots afterward, Bush won by several hundred votes, so how was the Supreme Court going to give the election to Gore...honestly? Base it on what they thought people meant to do? That is not the way elections work.
And a mighty fine rant indeed.
I'd buy you a beer if we were both in a bar.
Who said Nader doesn't already belong in the Alzheimer's ward? I mean, is anybody on top of that one?
I'm not a NadEr supporter, but thanks for assuming you know anything about me and my views. It really makes your *argument* so much stronger.
Ben,
You wrote what I wished I would have!
Since humdrum Ike defeated Intellectual Adlai in 52 and 56 we have had few clear choices:
Third party candidates have been the only choices from left of center since LBJ smashed Goldwater in 1964--and little did we know then that Barry Goldwater would seem clearly more progressive than the G.O.P. choices--and most of the Democrats--since 1968...
Bad presidential candidates? Good ones? Makes no never mind, beings the boys in the smoke filled room are the deciders. As rigged as any horse race, a Reno slot machine. Not perfect, or maybe even very good, but so much better than so many places. Back to those damned weevils again.
No, if you can believe the rumors, the Republicans had a big hand in funding his previous run(s)! If so, he's funded by ultra rich dude, just not himself.
Let's make him head of public health and safety or somewhere his skill set would be very useful. I just don't think he's presidential material. (And that might be a compliment!)
It is time to STOP be self-centered, either national or globaly and DO what is needed - as unpopular as it will be - and REDUCE the population of this Planet!! IF a program of birth control is initiated NOW - it will bring us to within global Sustainablity in 100 to 200 yrs.!!
I DON'T care who the damned candidate is; THEY are ALL cowards!! Pretty much everyone I've read in these posts is a selfish coward as well. Sorry - but that is IT!!
As for global cooling - WTF, I though you lived in WY!! Inane quips like that do nothing, but that seems to be the majority of these posts - DO NOTHING!! How about a viable/constructive suggestion that YOU'LL lead the way with??
Now Caleb, put up or shut up the nonsense.
IF I don't - WHAT are ya gonna DO?? As another said - NOTHING, because that is what your kind is - NOTHING!!
Scream about RIGHTS - what about responsibilities??