Peace In, Not Out
Reviving the Missoula Peace Sign: A New Campaign Begins
By Pete Talbot, 9-07-06
The center section from the Missoula peace sign rests in the backyard at a Northside home. Photo by Pete Talbot
For 18 years, a peace sign looked down on the city from Waterworks Hill. Actually, it was a 30-foot by 30-foot microwave reflector. But late one night in May 1983, four men and two women from the NSLF (North Side Liberation Front) scaled the structure and painted the ubiquitous peace sign.
From that point on, until May 2001, the peace sign endured. It withstood numerous re-paintings. US West Communications, the owner of the sign, would paint it white and activists would climb back up and reapply the peace symbol (and occasionally other icons). It withstood a fire in the summer of 2000. A cigarette tossed from a car on Interstate 90 started a fire that raced up the North Hills toward the peace sign. A slurry bomber extinguished the blaze as flames licked the structure. A six-foot-high fence topped with barbed wire was erected around the sign – not much of a hindrance, though, for folks willing to ascend a 30-foot vertical skin of sheet metal.
Then, satellite technology replaced microwave technology. Qwest Communications, the new owner of the sign, tore it down.
“Where did it go? Why don’t we have it anymore? Can we get a new one?” These are commonly asked questions by visitors viewing stickers, photos and other peace sign memorabilia at the Jeanette Rankin Peace Center, says the center’s director, Betsy Mulligan-Dague.
So now there’s talk of a new peace sign. But what will it be made of and where will it go?
The Peace Center has formed a committee that is circulating a petition to gain public input and brainstorming the best form for the new sign to take. So far, 118 people have signed the petition including Missoula’s mayor John Engen.
“The goal is to have a permanent, visible sign of peace in whatever form it may take,” Mulligan-Dague, “and to honor the old sign.”
All nine pieces (10-foot by 10-foot sections) of the original sign are in Missoula and accounted for. They’re in homes and gardens, garages and backyards. But maybe that’s where they’ll stay.
Mulligan-Dague said a committee has formed to study the feasibility of getting a peace sign, although “it might be time for something new.”
“We want to hear from people in the community” about where a peace sign should go and what it should look like, she said.
There’s been discussion of planting native grasses or bushes in the shape of a peace symbol on the open-space land where the old peace sign stood. There’s been talk of a mural, like the ones that grace a couple of Downtown Missoula’s buildings. And, of course, reuniting the nine pieces from the original peace sign is often the subject at the committee meetings.
“This discussion of if there is going to be a peace sign and where it will go is a practice in the peace process itself,“ Mulligan-Dague said.
Comments can be filed at the Jeanette Ranking Peace Center, 519 S. Higgins Ave. So far, no “no” comments have been submitted to the concept of some kind of peace sign somewhere, Mulligan-Dague said.
“Considering the violence in the world today, what better time to recommit to peaceful solutions,” community organizer Jim Parker said to a group of peace activists who gathered last week at the Missoula County Library, “Perhaps it’s time for the pieces of peace to be reunited.”
Reporter Kerry McMannis contributed to this article.
Note: This week’s Independent announced a walking vigil September 11 at 5:30 on Waterworks hill. Due to recent changes in rules about gathering on state land, that vigil will be moved to Jeanette Rankin Park and begins at 6.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.






Comments
Add your comment below
See: http://jerseyshorejournal.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=252&Itemid=60
The problem when you're a little too gung-ho about war is you end up killing people who weren't normally aggressive towards you, which doesn't exactly ingratiate you with their families and friends.
In fact, they might see you as the aggressor, and say something like, "Peace? Yep, that'll do it. The Christian fascists will just put flowers rather than bullets in their guns. The Marines will become the new flower children. America will make glow-in-the-dark butterflies with their nuclear plants, weapons, and depleted uranium rounds. The Air Force will take up sheep herding. The Army will borrow the orange sheets and take up begging at airports. See: (list of grievances here).
Yeah, I know this sounds like a pretty weird concept, but bombing the shit out of a country actually tends to make them *not* like you. In fact, they actually get upset when you torture and rape and kill them.
But hey, I guess that's their fault for not just sucking it up and taking it. After all, only we are capable of feeling human emotion and being part of humanity. The rest of the world, clearly, doesn't get that right.
If I run around and whack the shit out of people with a baseball bat, it's definately their fault if they don't like me. And if their families get upset? Fascists.
Salaam, indeed.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/saudi/analyses/madrassas.html
>>>>>>>>
What you're saying is that, if we wanted to look for the causes of what's happened -- Al Qaeda and the movement worldwide -- we would have to look to the schools, to the educational system which Saudi Arabia has fostered in the Islamic world?
... In order to have terrorists, in order to have supporters for terrorists, in order to have people who are willing to interpret religion in violent ways, in order to have people who are willing to legitimate crashing yourself into a building and killing 5,000 innocent people, you need particular interpretations of Islam.
Those interpretations of Islam are being propagated out of schools that receive organizational and financial funding from Saudi Arabia. In fact, I would push it further: that these schools would not have existed without Saudi funding. They would not have proliferated across Pakistan and India and Afghanistan without Saudi funding. They would not have had the kind of prowess that they have without Saudi funding, and they would not have trained as many people without Saudi funding.
<<<<<<<<<
These facist fanatics will not be dissuaded by Missoula's peace sign.
Perhaps not. But WE will be inspired by it.
It always amazes me when people are AGAINST peace.
We may indeed face enemies as a nation over time, but that does not mean we should stop longing for peace and working towards it. As the Bible says, "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the Sons of God." As the Qur'an says, "Allah loveth not the aggressors." As the Buddha Siddhartha Gautama said, "For in this world, hatred is never appeased by more hatred."
That is not a denial of self-defense, but a mind devoid of thoughts of peace, and only thoughts of paranoia, violence, and being wronged is one full of hatred. At that point, you must ask yourself: why do we deserve to survive? What makes us "good"? And the answer is a complex one, but peace is certainly a part of it, and something that is good for us to be reminded of.
I suggest Missoula ask your local VFW and returning veterans what do they think of the symbol and elicit their thoughts on what would be significant given their experiences. Don't make the decision in a vacuum filed with only like kind thinking. In my opinion, real symbols aren't objects, they are behaviour that is enduring, refreshing, and renewable everyday.
http://www.saroff.com/peaceApartRun.jpg