Guest opinion by walt minnick
Sali’s Vote Threatens Needed Funds
By Walt Minnick, 12-08-07
Boise businessman Walt Minnick is running for the Democratic nomination for the 1st Congressional District seat in Congress. His primary opponents are Rand Lewis and Larry Grant. The winner will face Congressman Bill Sali in November 2008.
Congressman Bill Sali has a very strange view of the world. His inability to work with even his fellow Republicans makes him an ineffective advocate for Idaho.
Now he claims Thomas Jefferson’s endorsement for his being one of the two deciding votes that killed an important appropriations bill. Sali hails his own “courage” for doing so.
No one can be sure how Thomas Jefferson would have voted on that bill. But most Idahoans can know there’s nothing courageous about Congressman Sali’s vote.
I’m sure that students at NNU, where funding for the nursing program is now threatened, don’t think of that vote as courageous. I’m sure that Idaho drivers stuck in traffic because the improvement of Highway 95 is now threatened don’t think his vote was courageous. And whatever lip service Congressman Sali has paid to the disabled, there’s nothing courageous about threatening funding for Idaho’s Special Olympics.
Sali’s big talk about voting against a few dribs and drabs of federal spending would be more convincing if he were actually taking on the politicians in Washington who have nearly doubled the national debt in seven years while cutting taxes for oil companies and Wall Street millionaires.
Or if he had voted to curtail pork barrel earmarks by all Congressmen when that bill was introduced at the beginning of this Congress--and for legislation requiring that any new Congressional spending be offset by spending cuts elsewhere in the budget.
Or if he had introduced a bill to require that the federal government balance its budget annually like you and I and the state of Idaho have to do every year.
Or if he were taking on our biggest boondoggle of all – ever increasing spending on the war in Iraq, a war whose costs are pushing ever-closer to $1 trillion. while keeping our troops pinned down in a civil war among groups who have been fighting each other for thousands of years. Playing umpire and policeman when we should be focusing our military on the capture of Osama bin Laden and the terrorists now holed up in Pakistan who brought down the World Trade Center.
Congressman Sali has done none of those things. .
Idahoans know we need to restore fiscal sanity in Washington. We need a Congressman with the courage to vote to spend only what we can pay for. One who will oppose loading trillions of dollars of new national debt onto our kids and grand-kids. One who knows we need to pass a Balanced Budget Amendment and stop lavishing new tax breaks on big oil companies and our wealthiest millionaires. And one who won’t brag about having the “courage” to vote against funding Idaho’s Special Olympics and money for new nurses at NNU while slavishly backing the runaway spending of an Administration that has never once in 7 years submitted a balanced budget!
But Idahoans also know we need a Congressman with the compassion to treat our troops with respect by giving them the medical help and educational benefits they deserve. Who wants all our citizens to have a health insurance policy. Who wants to help all our kids to be able to afford college.
We must spend less, but what we do spend must be on the right things. Careful spending that builds a stronger America. And less grandstanding about cutting tiny projects helpful to our own state while ignoring the real spending issues facing a nation slowly drowning in a sea of debt. That’s really what Thomas Jefferson and our Founding Fathers would expect from Congressman Sali. And, once accomplished, for other folks to brag about.
Publisher’s note on full disclosure: Walt Minnick’s wife is a longtime close friend of mine, and I volunteered a few hours in Minnick’s race for Senate in 1996.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.
Comments
Add your comment below
By the way it appears he works with his fellow R's over 87% of the time. So, is it a bad thing that he works with D's 13% of the time at the expense of party position?
The fact that Congressman Sali's record shows him voting with his fellow R's 87% of the time does not mean he votes with D's the other 13% of the time. I am not certain, but it wouldn't surprise me to find out he votes with D's 0% of the time.
That other 13% are those times when bi-partisan legislation gets both R's and D's voting the same way. Except for "Silly" Sali, of course.
Party affiliation in the House: http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/110/house/party-voters/ The average for R's is just under 85% while for D's it's just over 92%.
Look at the Senate where D party affiliation is also very stronger: http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/110/senate/party-voters/
Is it a good thing or bad when a legislator votes with his party or shows independence? Party line voting by D's is much stronger thatn R's in both the House and Senate.
This column is something I would expect to be said at a party meeting attended by the faithful to emotional rouse to action the already truly committed. Ask yourself these questions as they relate to 'a first time appearance and introduction' to readers here at New West:
!. Has Mr. Minnick clearly and convincingly argued his vision, goals, and credentials to be Idaho's next US House representative? Whatever Mr. Sali's warts, he won the last election.
2. Has Mr. Minnick sold himself to independent's and R's who voted for Mr. Sali or has he turned people off with his blatant partisan personal attack? Are people who did not vote D last time energized by the political rantings of personal destruction to vote for anyone who isn't Sali?
3. Given that D's are more likely to vote party line than R's, do Idaho voters want a candidate to represent them or just follow the party line?
4. If Mr. Minnick intends to represent the hearts and minds of Idahoans how will he break with party line voting to do that?
"the presidential veto of HR 3043"
<a > A bit here </a>
here
Mountain Goat Report has considerable coverage of Sali.
You asked what we (I can only answer for myself) think "about Sali's spending choices/votes, not his adherence to party lines" and I can answer in much the same vein as Minnick did; but, I won't be able to truly separate a politician's "spending choices/votes" from his party. They are part and parcel of the same thing.
One of the things that makes Sali's "spending choices/votes" so bad is that the current administration has already spent tremendous amounts of money on an unnecessary, badly timed, and unwise war; on tax cuts for people and industries that did not need them (believe me, I know... thanks, but no thanks); and in throwing away money on defense and Iraq reconstruction efforts without providing sufficient oversight to contain waste, fraud, and abuse, all while shortchanging other national needs and causing a historic level of national damage in the process. We have unmet needs in healthcare already, an aging population that will place greater strain on the healthcare system in the near future, and a vote against funding for nursing education is not what we need today. The fate of a single highway in Idaho may not determine our national destiny; but, the quality of our national infrastructure, including Idaho's roads, is fundamental to our economic capability and a vote against holding up Idaho's end of our national capability is not wise or helpful. One can argue whether the Special Olympics are essential to our national wellbeing; but, programs, like the Special Olympics, that reach out to include our most disadvantaged and to make them welcome as Americans actually are essential to sustaining our national identity and unity. Consistent, ideological, knee-jerk votes against such programs are both unwise and, frankly, not in the Christian spirit that Sali boasts about so often. In fact, my father used to say that Christian is as Christian does and few of them do. I believe Sali fits this picture.
Nope - but pointing out where his votes work against the interests of Idahoans may perhaps.