07/29/2010 - 1:30 PM - Venue: The Library! at Cole & Ustick
07/29/2010 - 2:00 PM - Venue: Boise Art Museum
07/29/2010 - 2:00 PM - Venue: Boise Public Library
07/29/2010 - 3:00 PM - Venue: Garden City Library
07/29/2010 - 6:00 PM - Venue: Qwest Arena
07/29/2010 - 7:00 PM - Venue: Columbia Performing Arts Center
07/29/2010 - 7:00 PM - Venue: Memorial Stadium
07/29/2010 - 7:30 PM - Venue: Boise Little Theater
07/29/2010 - 8:00 PM - Venue: Neurolux
07/29/2010 - 9:00 PM - Venue: Terrapin Station
© 2010 NewWest, All Rights Reserved. Use of this site is subject to New West's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Comments
Add your comment below
"Many of the opposition [to the new Federal Constitution] wish to
take from Congress the power of internal taxation. Calculation
has convinced me that this would be very mischievous." --Thomas
Jefferson to William Carmichael, 1788.
The Russians, Chinese, Iran, North Korea, et al all increased their power, influence and armed capabilities under the Bush Administration. You can disagree with the Obama Administration's foreign policy all you want, but all agree that it is too early to tell if it is working. (By the way, you are in the super minority if you disapprove of President Obama's foreign policy. His disapproval rating is around 28% according to the latest from Gallup. Check the link if you like: http://www.gallup.com/poll/117229/Obama-Working-Approval-Foreign-Affairs.aspx)
I will answer your question about where I was when Bush was spending and increasing the debt. First I was still growing in my understanding of the economy. Until recently I thought we had a basically free market economy and the government was only stepping in to do good. I bought the line that the tax cuts were actually tax cuts, and that they would grow the economy. I supported the war again terrorist and still do. Below is the time line starting in 2000 how I grew.
2000-I believed that if the Republicans were given a chance they would shrink the size of government.
2001-I was more concerned about terrorism.
2004-Did not like Bush or Republicans, but Kerry was not an option due to his stance on terrorism.
2006-Wanted the Republicans out of office, but the options were not even better.
2008-Did not want/trust Obama. Voted for McCain only because of Palin. Did not vote for a Republican for the Senator, liked my Rep. as an individual.
2009-Now I want all incumbents out of office, would still be here if McCain had one and continued on the same course.
As for the highest standard of living, that comes from having a government that focuses on the things government does best, not scattershotting on everything government can do to pander to the constituent du mouth.
The only point here with any validity at all, Bob, is the lack of criticism of the Bush Administration by Republicans. Mea culpa...you'll notice a lot of us never praised Bush, but never castigated him for fear of making the far-worse alternative look relatively better.
Same deal with McCain. Didn't love him, fer shure, think he was a flaming idiot, especially after voting for the bailout along with the current President.
But back to Bush, the fact is that the man, and those he surrounded himself with, lacked basic competence, much less any equivalent of political skill and cunning when compared to the Clinton Administration. Objectively, the Clintonistas were dang good at the ideological game, the Bushies were shockingly inept, as was the Republican leadership in Congress.
Now, if I'm hoping that maybe the numbskulls representing my side might go away to be replaced with bloody knife fighters I can agree with (didn't happen, darn it) d'ya think I'm gonna scream and yell from the rooftops that my team stinks, so that the other guys get their bloody knife fighters elected instead? No, I'm gonna do the Cleveland Browns thing, wear the bag as long as I can stand it...
But not any more.
----------------------------
"Such an effort is never easy. It's always harder to forge true partnerships and sturdy alliances than to act alone, or to wait for the action of somebody else. It's more difficult to break down walls of division than to simply allow our differences to build and our resentments to fester. So we must be honest with ourselves. In recent years we've allowed our Alliance to drift. I know that there have been honest disagreements over policy, but we also know that there's something more that has crept into our relationship. In America, there's a failure to appreciate Europe's leading role in the world. Instead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive.
But in Europe, there is an anti-Americanism that is at once casual but can also be insidious. Instead of recognizing the good that America so often does in the world, there have been times where Europeans choose to blame America for much of what's bad.
On both sides of the Atlantic, these attitudes have become all too common. They are not wise. They do not represent the truth. They threaten to widen the divide across the Atlantic and leave us both more isolated. They fail to acknowledge the fundamental truth that America cannot confront the challenges of this century alone, but that Europe cannot confront them without America.
So I've come to Europe this week to renew our partnership, one in which America listens and learns from our friends and allies, but where our friends and allies bear their share of the burden. Together, we must forge common solutions to our common problems."
-----------
You see no outrage over the Afghan war because there is none.
With an ending statement like this " Now shut up and get out of the way. We’ve got work to do. ", I fully expect a full column on where this country should go in a bipartisan direction.
...but I sure wouldn't mind seeing Rush or Newt or Hannity " teabagged".
I'm proud of you when you say that you pay your taxes and don't bitch because you like the services you use. Most of my professional musician and artist buddies receive a significant portion of their annual income in cash in $200, $300 , $600 dollar increments and they never pay a dime in taxes to support the services they use. I admit harboring some resentment at these tax sofflaw buds that in turn force me to pay more. Their attitude is it's only a couple hundred here and there yet they probably net more then I do with a regular wage and witholding.
My hat is off to you Bob if you claimed 100 percent of your self employed cash income plus the usual 1099 income earned this year and paid your taxes. We greatly appreciate your integrity.
* The Boise Tea Party - 2,500 mostly looky-loos
* Obama Rally - 14,000 who stood in line for hours
In a State so conservative they'd elect Dracula so long as he was running on the Republican Ticket (or Rush Limbaugh anointed him)!
I watched some of the media coverage and these complainer people seem completely uninformed.
I have heard that the protests originated from libertarian groups but was taken over by the Rush/Republican/Fox News machine.
the media couldnt agree on getting out of the way of a runaway train to save their own lives.
the vile rhetoric on the extreme left and right is sickening. main stream media should be ashamed of their portrayal of the tea partyers.
i look forward to your articles bob wire, but , come on tone it down. these protesters were hard working tax payers young and old, left and right,repubs and demos ,who were peaceful and respectful.
And Dave is correct; if McCainiac had won, we'd still be pissed with the politicians of both parties for overspending.
Even though I didn't vote for Barry, I'm not a sorehead. It would have been a disaster no matter which candidate won.
It's about time you move on, Bob, and get over your BDS. You'll be happier and live longer.
...
Never mind "four days of hand wringing to kill three pirates" (let me understand: you're criticizing someone because those three pirates weren't killed soon enough?), "the biggest problem this country has is the vicious partisan divide (and excuse my bias), mostly driven by the Left."
That's crazy sick dude.
If you don't love it leave it motherfuckers!!!!
I'd like to try an experiment but big Marxists like Bob would never go for it. Take one state like Texas would be great, and let them out of the US to form their own limited government country. Let that go for just 10 years and then compare their lifestyle and economy to the remaining US. What do you think it would look like? Of course this has been tried in the past, just compare the US to say... oh anybody else in the world. I'd say without a doubt, from our founding, we have been the one country with the most liberty from government control, and our standard of living here is well above the rest of the world.
No Bush was "our guy", McCain wasn't "our guy", Clinton and Obama certainly aren't "our guys" Not even Ron Paul wasn't close to being "our guy" (well maybe he was SOME of those protesters guy LOL!) Now Reagan... I'd take that for sure. Luckily Obama is most like Carter's 2nd term so hopefully 2012 will be Reagan's 3rd!
Memories light the corner of my mind
Misty George Bush colored memories
Of the way we were...
By RICHARD WOLF, USA TODAY
February 05, 2008
President Bush's proposed $3.1 trillion budget may be dead on arrival in Congress, but the impact of that political deadlock will make life difficult for the man or woman who succeeds him.
The next president will inherit a deficit of about $400 billion, and maybe more. Unless the economy rebounds and revenue pours in, deficits will push the cumulative federal debt past $12 trillion in the next five years.
He or she will need to spend far more in Iraq and Afghanistan than Bush proposed, because he included only $70 billion - designed to last until Jan. 20, when he leaves office. White House budget director Jim Nussle said Monday that even the cost of drawing down forces is "surprisingly high."
Scattered pictures of a politcal party that has died,
Smiles we gave to one another
For the faith based way we were.
Good night Republican Party!!!
Nevermind this "I got an opinion and its right" bullshit.
What the hell happened to our movie reviews?
Education - increase in State Tax
Energy - Cap and Trade, Mileage tax
Healthcare - Tobacco Tax (this has gone into effect and the tax rate increased 66%)
Who do you really think this will affect the most?
I think the key word here is "yet". Democrats were constantly hollering for Bush to raise taxes in order to offset his wild spending - so exactly how is Obama going to pay for all his own spending?
And are you guys going to keep justify all Obama increasing the national debt with "Bush did it too"? Because I was under the impression you wanted someone who wasn't anything like Bush.
Bob nailed it. Eight years of silence on a failed bush experiment screwed this country into such a hole that Obama will need TWO brooms to clean up the mess.
But take heart, you right wingers. As soon as Palin gets impeached for impersonating a governor with a double digit IQ, she can come on down and do the "you betcha" circuit to keep the base in constant rapture and the "old white males" with a vision for their next wet dream.
I think John Stewart nailed it last week. To the right wingers, you lost the election. It's SUPPOSED to taste like a shit sandwich.
A lot of tax cheating is going on. Just look at the prospective appointees to the Obama cabinet, and the minders were culling them like bad potatoes early on for tax avoidance and non-payment. It is cultural now, and endemic. People cheat on their taxes. And the people who don't are paying the way for the cheaters, even cabinet level cheaters. It makes no nevermind if you are a liberal or a conservative, a brilliant Obama supporter or a libelous layabout and lout of a conservative Republican McCain supporter, you are cheating on your taxes. The Democrats cheat on every election, so why would they not cheat on their taxes? Even Clinton got caught stealing White House furniture as he left office, while his minions sabotaged computers and trashed Executive Office building offices. Now they have to include another genius in their leadership, Al Franken. One wonders if he will get parodied by Saturday Nite Live writers like himself, for the joke that his ascent to office has been.
We do, you know, subscribe to the nanny state idea from the Obama administration in that they have given trillions to banks and corrupt insurance companies and none to citizens. What would have happened if not saving banks, letting them fail, and sending $150,000 to each 2007 tax filer instead would have had on kick-starting our economy? It does not take many people with an extra $50,000 to get together and start a bank, which then would start lending the money and building the bank's assets. But we are not to be trusted, and that from the leadership of the Democrat party. It is a top down government they want to foist on us, and that alone is reason enough to publicly complain. Of course, the smarty pants victors in the fall elections have a mandate to be the nanny state, and complaints seem to be uniformly dubbed "whining." Do as I do, believe as I believe, or you are stupid and a whiner. Gee, does that ever advance the discourse!!!
The silent majority will not say anything, but will not report all their income, either. Cash is king. Ebay or Craig's List. All cash. And when the Feds close them down, the internet will spawn another method, mode, for exchanging goods for cash...day working for cash is a way of life for millions already. They work for the Obama Cabinet. Clean their homes, care for their kids, drive their cars, mow their lawns. Screw the tax man. I come first. You have some of it, but not all of it, or even half of it. The Tea Party crew was just people with a conscience who are frustrated. The rest keep their mouths shut and a jar of twenties in the gun safe.
It is tough to want the paved road and not want oil drilling. It is tough to want a concrete road and no mining. It is tough to want a log house but no clear cuts, or clean electricity but no dams, no wind turbines, no solar panels across critical habitat. It is tough to want it all at no cost, and tougher to want it all at a reasonable cost. The liberals have created the privilege class of public employee with cradle to grave care, retirements and salaries equal or greater than private sector jobs, but create no wealth, and castigate the wealth creators as "greedy" for their success. The public sector gets paid, success or no. Great work and great benefits, and no expectations. So the roads don't get paved, Bob. Sometimes the holes get patched, and sometimes they don't. But gravel has to be mined to get the rock and holes drilled to get the asphalt, or more mining to get concrete. Compromise. So we still fight wars around the world. We still are hated for our successes. We are still the place people enter illegally to live and work. And we are still the place where we can seek redress from trespass against our pursuit of happiness and our personal security in public displays of political anger without fear of being jailed and held for no reason. You gotta love that. So to all you who want to address the "whiners", why don't you cowboy up and win like men, and not be some Lord Fauntleroy in short pants and marceled hair sniggering "nah nah nah" from behind the barricades of your temporal majority. Things can change, and having your noses rubbed in the dog shit of defeat can be humiliating. We know. But we also know your VietNam hero was a dunderhead with a Lenoesque chin and New England hair and that was all there was to him. Bush was not that bad a deal. Kerry could have won and put your party in the hole for another half century. Bush saved you. Bush gave the Democraps life. You should worship him. And you know it.
If Mr. Bob "Mensa Society" Wire were to quit frothing at the mouth long enough to consider a cogent, rational approach to his diatribes, well, I guess you couldn't call him a progressive any longer.
If you keep track of what you spend, and what you spend it on, go figure, don't just juggle a bunch of numbers and expand a whine into a pseudo-treatise.
So, here we have one of the primary players in this whole thing essentially admitting, in a major newspaper, that all of this outrage, all this protesting, all this pseudo-grassroots mob mentality is based on nothing more than speculation about what Obama might do about taxes in the future. What is this, some sort of clarivoyant, pre-emptive protest strategy? What else that might happen in the future, but that we have no proof of, should we also be protest?
Certainly, there are many things to be frustrated about right now, but the above admission confirms for me that this whole "tea-bagging" thing is really just a lot of misplaced frustration, looking for any outlet, logical or not, and being encouraged by the likes of Glenn Beck and other histrionic opportunists of his ilk.
An hour ago I was talking to a neighbor who has an insulation business. He has made an effort to track the fees the city collects for specific purposes in the fee schedule. And you find the sewer hook up money paying for a new police car or police computers that you need to hook up with the Federal data bases, and similar tracks. Most of the money just gets put in the general slop bucket and if there is not enough to keep the water pipes repaired or the sewers running, they just charge more. We are paying $60 a month to be hooked up to water and sewer, and if we use some water, they charge us by the 1000 gallons used. The water is pumped out of a well and distributed in the pipes you paid for when you built the house, from the mainlines the developer was required to put in when he built the subdivision. So is that a tax or payment for services?
If you add up all the taxes and fees, government is getting half or more of a working man's gross wages. On your first $1 through $106,250 in wages or salary, you pay 7.65% to SSI and Medicare and that is matched by your employer. The tax on the value of your wages is 15.3%. Off the top. If you make your money from trust funds, which is apparently the income of secure New West responders, you pay no tax on unearned income (trusts, rents, royalties, capital gains, etc.) to SSI. If your income tax rate is 15% for $8025-$32550 incomes or 25% for income above that to $78850, then you are at either 30% or 40% Federal income tax, including the total SSI-Medicare payment. Add all the other taxes you pay that are not deductible, are not plainly shown in statements, and you get damned close to the telltale 50%. Property taxes are a part of that. Renters pay them for the property owner in their rent. We are sharecroppers for government, and we get less from it that those who don't work, who get food, rent, medical and education subsidies while not paying any taxes. That makes those of us who still have a modicum of a paycheck sharecroppers with government and their voting supporters who do not work at all, generationally, by choice. That is not a whine. That is a fact. And the present course of government is to put the poorest and the most wealthy on the financial dole with the middle class dollar. And all too many of the middle class get paid by tax dollars, to make decisions that spend tax dollars and raise more tax dollars. Perpetual motion machines don't work without adding energy somewhere at sometime....and neither do governments, bureaucrats, and legislators and other elected politicians. Theirs is a growth industry by their design, and if the energy or capital runs short, in our name they borrow the money to keep on going while chastising us for borrowing and not being able to pay. Do as I say, not as I do. I can see a glint of hypocrisy in that. And if my ideas were from the progressive, liberal, left slant, this is the time when I would say that the communist lefty bastard election buying crooked MoFo Chicago Mob government we now have, all the jobs and slots bought and paid for by the unions and school teachers, the prison guards, the public employee unions local and national, the rat bastards, the slobbering hogs at the public trough......ad nauseum.....but I will leave that for you "progressives" to hurl the invective at anyone who you don't agree with, while you provide nothing more than vitriol, and demean your antagonists at every chance. No wonder the education union run public schools won't let kids play tag anymore. I guess the smarty pants ones occasionally get tagged too hard and cry. So now they are huddled around the skirts of their victory, and hurling insults with abandon. Keep it up. Someone, someday, will get tired of your baseless insults and clean out your snot locker for you. Playground style.
I'm not asking you where your income comes from, do me the same courtesy and spare us with your snarky speculation about where others' get theirs.
But do this: add up all the taxes you paid in the last hour, day, week, month, year, whatever, and divide by your income over the same period, multiply by 100 and tell us what percent that is.
Then I'll do the same thing. And we can proceed with a discussion based on our own personal facts, rather than enthusiastic hand-waving.
http://www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/93.html
They've been tracking all taxes (federal, state, local) as a percentage of income for many years. Their numbers say the current burden has just slipped below 30%, and is the lowest it's been since the 1960s.
ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK
RESIDENTS FLEE AS NY RANKS LAST FOR 2009 ECONOMIC OUTLOOK
" There's an old saying that high taxes don't redistribute income, they redistribute people. Unfortunately for the hard-working taxpayers of New York, this wisdom seems to be lost on Gov. Paterson and a majority of legislators in Albany.
For 2009, the Empire State earns the dubious distinction of having the worst economic outlook of any state in the nation -- 50th out of 50.
This is according to the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a non-partisan membership association of state legislators. And New York's dismal ranking was measured even before any of the proposed job-killing tax increases were on the table."
http://www.nypost.com/seven/04192009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/escape_from_new_york_165198.htm?page=0
...
(spoken by a crusty old character in the Bob Newhart show)
couldn't resist - sorry.
Now, if Americans wanted real change in this country, they'd toss out those that have brought us to this point: the Democrats AND Republicans. They are two sides of the same coin that's been in circulation for damn near 150 years.
They are corrupt, worn out and lack any vision, clarity of thought or moral fiber.
The sad, sad deal is the case the networks were making about Murtha last night on the news. He shakes a business down for a few thousand bucks and the payback is a few million for the business. That is how the Democrats work the scam in Oregon, where they have had the governor's office, the Sec of State, and Attny Genl for twenty or more years. Grow government. Every local, county, state employee is required---no getting out of it---to pay union dues. Not join the union. No requirement. But you have to pay the dues. And the dues go to political action committees that support 98% Democrat candidates. So we get an employee with a total cost of $150,000 each in salary, benefits, office space, supervision, autos, whatever, to gain a few hundred bucks a year for the campaign pot. And that is Murtha: you give him $10,000 or less, and he gets you US Govt aid of a $Million or more. Not unlike the thief who steals your stuff and then fences it for pennies on the dollar value. Your "earmarks" go to "special friends" who have paid to get aid from you and I. Our money. By way of Mr. Elected Stuffed Shirt, or today, CA Rep. Jane Harmon or so it is being reported. A tit for a tat. Or however that goes. Pro quid pro. Which used to mean "misunderstand", was used by lawyers to describe an exchange of equal amounts of value, and now bastardized by our esteemed law makers into "you give a thousand bucks and I'll make sure you get a million in the budget." Corrupt is an understatement when describing our present governments at all levels...Hey, Blago!!! Fries with that?
lay off the moonshine, buddy, its quid pro quo. let me know when you & your ilk decide to pretend Halloween is in April again, I'll be sure to be there