Taxpayer Bailout: Ownership Society?
Thanks for the Bailout, America!
By Christian Probasco, 10-06-08
In my last blog I wrote, “It seems to me that the real lesson of 9/11, besides that terrible things can happen to innocent people, is not to depend too much on law enforcement agencies for your safety, or for rescue.”
That’s law enforcement agencies. But as for the government itself—well, who knows? The government bails out and bestows privileges on special interest groups, which includes everyone but working folks. But somehow we got in! We put some money down on a reasonably priced house in rural Utah at the height of the boom and our loan was approved by a major mortgage company which then cratered spectacularly. Seemed like bad timing, especially with the interest rate we had to pay, but that we were approved at all may have been because of Bill Clinton’s and George Bush III’s push for more housing of the indigent. The “push” that resulted in looser standards for lenders and ultimately, bizarre financial instruments that couldn’t possibly have worked, except in theory.
So thanks for the recent bailout, America! Even though our tax money is being sucked down the same great black hole as everybody else’s, we’re also reaping some of the benefits as well—for once! Our house has gone up in value about 30% since we got into the market.
Views from Utah
According to Utah blogger Mark E. Towner, you may have been better off drinking beer and recycling the aluminum cans than investing in the stock market.
Said law scholar and University of Utah Professor Emeritus Ed Firmage on October 5th:
“This abortion of a bill protects the platinum parachutes of the super-rich, bails out the banks, insurance companies, investment companies, the Chinese, who own most of the U.S. now; the Robber Barons of the Middle East big oil states who own that part of our money not already pledged to Russia for her oil.
This will at most cause a bit of a rally for a week or so; and then we will fall deeper faster to almost total ruin.”
Right on track so far. New Wester historian Richard Warnick tries to explain here why the bailout isn’t the fault of 1) the Community Reinvestment Act 2) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and/or 3) immigrants. Fannie and Freddie, according to Warnick, were just victims. I have to point out, though, that contrary to Warnick’s headline ("Repbulicans: Don’t Blame Us, We Just Run the Government"), the Republicans haven’t been running the government, at least since the last election. What did the Democrats do to head off the current crises?
National Views
Massachusetts Democratic Congressman Barney Frank apparently traced the origins of the current crises, “back to Ronald Reagan, when at his inauguration he said, ‘Government is not the answer to our problems; government is the problem.’” When, I’d like to know, has the current administration ever tried to put that philosophy into practice? Was it with the No Child Left Behind Act? Or maybe it was the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act?
From the statement which got Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi into trouble in the first, failed vote on the bailout:
“Democrats insisted that legislation responding to this crisis must protect the American people and Main Street from the meltdown on Wall Street.
The American people did not decide to dangerously weaken our regulatory and oversight policies. They did not make unwise and risky financial deals. They did not jeopardize the economic security of the nation. And they must not pay the cost of this emergency recovery and stabilization bill.”
But then, who does she think will pay for it?
For an opposing viewpoint, the Washington Post’s Sebastian Mallaby, meanwhile, has a very insightful column which blames the current crises on tons of Chinese capital and the Fed’s “clean up later policy,” rather than the usual scapegoat of deregulation. Sounds more plausible to me but I’m NOT AN ECONOMIST. I am also not paid millions upon millions of dollars to make wise decisions for financial firms.
Finally, here’s a great analysis of the bailout from James Ostrowski, writing for Lew Rockwell. Stealing from the poor and giving to the rich--that’s the American way!
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.

Comments
Add your comment below
"Banks have proved themselves to be the most hazardous economic institution known to man. Breakdowns in banking lie at the centre of most financial crises. And banks are unusually effective at spreading financial distress, once it starts, from one place to another."
The Economist, May 3, 2003. "A cruel sea of capital: A survey of global finance."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"Proponents of the loan push notion suggest that the banks have victimized themselves by their absurd lending decisions .... From this perspective, bankers as loan pushers become active door to door salesmen (albeit in pin stripe suits)."
William Darity and Bobbie Horn. The Loan Pushers: The role of commercial banks in the international debt crisis. 1988. Ballinger Publishing Company, a subsidiary of Harper & Row.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Construction is notorious for its boom/bust character and after each bust bank managers become very cautious and resolve never to become so exposed again. But when they are again awash in liquidity and desperate to put money to work, a new cycle begins."
George Soros. The Crisis of Global Capitalism. 1998
---------------------------------------------
"Real estate speculation must be as old as the land - in the United States, it is certainly as old as the frontier - and the first bad bank loan was no doubt made around the time of the opening of the first bank."
"Still, the boom of the 1980s was unique. Not only did creditors lend more freely than they had in the past, but the government intervened more actively than it had ever done before to absorb the inevitable losses. Two important trends converged in the boom : the democratization of lending and the socialization of risk : more and more people were able to borrow, and more and more debt was federally subsidized …. By standing behind good banks and bad banks alike, the government in effect removed the oldest charter in banking - that is, safekeeping."
James Grant. Money of the Mind : Borrowing and Lending in America from the Civil War to Michael Milken. Farrar Straus Giroux. 1992. Introduction, p.5.
-----------------------------------------------------
"For better or worse, American capitalism has taken on a new look. At one time, it was a system based on owning. It is now a system based on owing."
Medoff, James and Harless, Andrew. The Indebted Society. 1996. Little, Brown.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
' … the main dangers to the success of capitalism are the very people who would consider themselves its most ardent advocates : the bosses of companies, the owners of companies, and the politicians who tirelessly insist that they are 'pro-business'."
"… widespread and quite outrageous abuse, by capitalists, of capitalism … The danger exists everywhere in the world, but it matters most in the United States."
" … the abuse of capitalism and of democracy in the country that is seen - especially by itself - as the highway to greatness."
The Economist, Special 160th Anniversary Issue, A Survey of Capitalism and Democracy, June 26-July 4, 2003
--