Movie Q and A
The Travel Less Roaded
A new wildlife film explores avenues to save animals and the planet, without paving paradise.By Amy Linn, 6-04-09
If life is a highway, we’re in trouble--unless we start making highways safer for wildlife, wildlands and the planet. Simply put, America’s ever-expanding web of streets and freeways is a noxious force that threatens to “pave over the landscape.”
So says Division Street, a beautifully filmed and notable new wildlife documentary premiering Thursday, June 11, at 7 p.m. at the Roxy Theater in Missoula.
The screening will be followed by a panel discussion featuring filmmaker/producer Eric Bendick and officials from Transportation for America and American Wildlands.
Division Street, a one-hour film about the collision course between roads, wildlife, and the wilderness, is an official selection by the national Wild & Scenic Environmental Film Festival. It’s also a road trip--and a call to Americans to imagine a road-less one.
Bendick travels from pristine forests to concrete jungles, filming a panoply of animals (a turtle, a cougar, a grizzly) forced to deal with dangerous roadways. He dodges taxicabs in Miami and explores Glacier National Park’s Going to the Sun Road.
His quest: to find eco-friendly transportation routes that protect habitats, animals and the earth.
Old-fashioned roads create islands of land flanked by whizzing cars on sprawling pavement; they divide communities and destroy animal migration routes. They also cause costly and deadly auto collisions with wildlife.
The good news? Today’s ecologists, engineers, city-planners, and citizens are creating greener options, says Bendick.
The 29-year-old filmmaker, a graduate of Montana State University’s science and natural history filmmaking program, points to a Montana success story--Highway 93 on the Flathead Indian Reservation. “It’s an example of a quite extraordinary effort to mitigate the impacts of highway construction--in this case, an expanded road--on the natural environment,” he says.
New West caught up with Bendick in Bozeman to ask him more.
New West: Was there a lightbulb moment when you knew you had to make this movie?
Bendick: Absolutely. Early on in my research, I discovered that the farthest point in the lower 48 states was less than 22 miles from the nearest road. It was an unbelievable moment for me. As Americans, we have this fantasy that the West is still a very wild and untamed place, but that’s no longer the case.
Instead, we’ve carved up what was once a tremendously rich and complete ecosystem into isolated pockets of wilderness.
Unless we get a handle on roads in the American West--and in other developing regions around the world--our wild areas will get progressively less and less wild. And with them goes a whole way of life and identity. It’s not just the wildlife that disappears--it’s really the “spirit of place” that changes.
New West: A lot of Americans don’t see the harm in roads. Do we need to see the problems up close--the deer dodging cars, the cougars and bears in your film--before we do something about them?
Bendick: To a large degree, we are numb to everything about the car and highway lifestyle; we take it completely for granted. But, beneath the surface, Americans, myself included, are deeply conflicted.
On the one hand, we love the freedom of the road. On the other, we love wilderness, wildlife, and off-the-grid adventure. The irony is that most Americans experience “the great outdoors” through the windshield of a car, which is a completely artificial way of seeing.
We seldom think about the other side of the coin. From an animal’s perspective, roads can be truly dangerous, disruptive, life-threatening barriers. We need to see roads from that point of view to get past our own blind spots and assumptions.
New West: Where can people see the film after its premier in Missoula?
Bendick: A shorter version is touring with the Wild & Scenic Film Festival. The full, unabridged version is embarking on a tour throughout the Northern Rockies, winding its way through Montana, Wyoming, Idaho and Alberta, Canada.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.





Comments
Add your comment below
Not sure what Bendick meant by this comment. The northern-most tip of Maine has a road within 22 miles? Or any point in the lower 48 is within 22 miles of a road?
I'd guess that a lot of roads have less than 25 vehicles per day. I can see that busy roads would pose a crossing problem, but not rural roads and city streets.
Wish the movie would be shown outside the northwest.
I love seeing elk as I cross from Lost Mtn. Trail into Idaho, but I would forego the visible signs of elk along the road to save their lives. J
I knew a man who worked for the Oregon Hiway Dept. He drove a snowplow and picked up dead animals on the roadside for disposal. He kept a log, and every year he threw more deer in a dump truck than the Game Commission alloted for the management unit the hiway bisected. How many more got even a hundred yards off the road to die is not known.
I have seen cougars, mink, martens, bears, countless birds and reptiles, deer and elk, and this in the last year. A couple of months ago, I saw a wolf at noon along I-90 looking to cross near Saltese, MT.
The most useful freeway improvement this nation could embark upon would be the creation of over and under passes for wildlife, with directing fences, on major and minor hiways across the West. All the hoohaw about USFS roads, and road obliteration, is wasted effort if you look at habitat on a larger scale, and believe connectivity is important. The whole of the reasoning about NREPA is purported to be about that issue, and not just another Wilderness deal to secure undeveloped land. If you bisect it, carve it up, as it is now, with freeways and high speed two way roads, paved, all the connectivity gains are lost to auto and truck delivered mortality. It is a waste of time and effort.
If we were to gain placement of a number of secure wildlife crossings, and the results are measurable as to habitat use of significant populations on either side of the bisecting roadway, the issue of connectivity would gain some credence. And maybe, that connectivity would lessen the need to place great chunks of ground into classifications that essentially preclude most human use and visitation.
In the Machiavellian ways of all things political, I can see obstruction and obfuscation of the secure crossing issue as it would challenge some tenets of larger area land use restrictions.
In my backyard, I-5 from Portland to Weed, CA., has 5 major grades for trucks to pull. If they exit at Goshen, and take US 58 over Willamette Pass, and then on down to US 97 at Chemult, south on to Klamath Falls, Doris, CA, and one grade just before Weed and I-5, the trip is 15 miles longer but saves a bunch on fuel because of only having to pull Willamette Pass and the hill before Weed. The downside is, there once was a significant mule deer population that used the east side of the Cascades in summer, and the High Desert for winter ground. That meant crossing 97 and the UP mainline RR lines twice a year. The resulting mayhem of annually increasing truck traffic and the lure of the Bend area to California auto traffic has decimated that race of deer. Once what was thousands has become hundreds. And it all is about second homes, million dollar second homes, in winter habitat and high speed roads laden with an extraordinary truck load trying to save on expensive fuel. And no secure wildlife crossings. A great deal of the area of concern is on public lands, and where better to spend stimulus or government money than on Deschutes, Winema, and Fremont Natl Forest bordered US 97. Or that road in your state that has become an egregious killer of animals, large or small. Habitat for dead critters is sort of a funky way of looking at conservation. We first need to protect the ones now living and using the available habitat.
That claim that no point in America is more than 22 miles from a road is a little ridiculous. What kind of road? Certainly not paved because I know places in the Texas Big Bend that are 40-50 miles from any pavement but there are dirt trails slightly above wagon tracks. Not exactly a threat to the deer and armadillos - they might see a couple dozen vehicles pass a year.
FYI: I went to some driving schools for off-road rally competition years ago and this old Swedish driver always said, "Never brake for deer" If you can't clear it, you need to hit it HARD. he would demonstrate how if you hit a deer under braking your nose would be down and you'll impact the legs, the deer would be thrown on your hood and through the windshield. He taught to accelerate to lift the front and hit the front quarter to spin it away. I used that technique once and the truck went right over the deer. Took months to get the smell of burnt meat out of the exhaust system.
I would like to witness that rally instructor when he is faced with a bear, an elk or a moose, an angus or horse on the open range.
At freeway speeds, people die and so does the critter. Not improvement to the environment in that deal. Especially since all the meat is removed to a landfill or the long faced undertaker's, cheating the carrion eaters. No putting uncle Phil in the crotch of a cottonwood today. He might poison some carrion snacker.
And then in some free association mind fart, as often happens to me, I have to wonder about the raven road patrol, and the raven in literature, and the raven as a battlefield scrounger of note. Has the raven been following people for millennia just because they know our propensity for creating meat snacks sooner than later? The wolf became the basis for out dogs. Why have we not domesticated the raven as some sort of scout for meat? I have a distinct feeling that humans have only turned down carrion recently in the time of our being on the earth. And some still do, as witnessed by the Roadkill Cafe and the discriminate salvage of meat on the roadside. I used to stop and pick up the pheasants that once were numerous in these parts, and flew into your windshield from nowhere with regularity. The only bird collision that I know about that had a bad ending for the driver of the car was a kid at the mill I was working for. He came over a hump and whoopee on the road and in the draw all too late came the vision of turkey buzzards working over a deer carcass and his CJ jeep windshield wasn't tough enough to repel a buzzard full of deer grout. He was a MESS!! and so was the jeep. No injury to anything but glass and pride, all with an odiferous overtone. The buzzard died for his effort at escape. The ravens were picking at the buzzard that afternoon, none the worse for wear. Few of them become victims of mayhem. Truly a wise bird and a true survivor. They should, however, wear one of those safety orange vests while doing their road patrol and packing off of high speed created morsels of meat and bone. And a little yellow hard hat with blinking LED red lights on it. And a flagger. They need a flagger so they aren't having to bounce up and down like Dominican short stop all the time. Hiway workers need all the help they can get. Ravens are certainly qualified hiway workers.
I agree that highway engineering can in fact reduce loss, the question becomes at what price and how effective?
I like the British way of getting good design: have a contest. Put up a quarter million dollar prize for a critter crossing, and let the clever ones design it. I think about the Viet Nam Memorial wall, and that is just how that came about. Thousands of young engineers just graduated from college. And the brightest and the best can devise unknown and new designs and techniques. OH, by bad!!! Can you pay incentives in a socialist system? Or are they reserved as awards for spying on your neighbors?
Dave, I don't know how we, as a Nation, pay for anything. I guess just print money. I would just as soon print money to build something here as print money to buy stuff from China. I hope we keep our supply of Hummer parts. That way we can salvage damaged ChiCom vehicles and put them to use on the more and more certain battlefield of the future. I would hope that designing and constructing critter crossings would provide jobs that ObamaNation cannot sell overseas, as seems to be their forte' for now, in direct contradiction of the campaign rhetoric. I would rather see the whole of the Hummer construction machinery and parts destroyed and melted down to build a better fence on our border. Red neck that I am.
<a >Missoula Green Carpet Cleaning</a>
Roads with ZERO traffic are still devastating for wildlife, because many species are unable to cross them, because they are afraid to be out in the open, where they are vulnerable to their predators. See for example http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/roads1 .