Welcome to the No-Zone Zone
Moscow Takes a Wrecking Ball to Its Central Business District
By Joan Opyr, 3-29-06
Last night, Moscow's Board of Adjustment granted an application by New St. Andrews College for a Conditional Use Permit that would allow the school to remain in the city's Central Business District. New St. Andrews, a serial zoning violator, moved into the historic Skattaboe Building in 2003, despite the fact that educational institutions were, at the time, expressly forbidden in Moscow's Central Business District. (Our previous City Council took care of that little problem by re-writing the law to suit the offender. I wish speeding tickets worked this way.)
I don't think it's an overstatement to described the Board of Adjustments' proceedings as farcical. Several downtown business owners offered compelling testimony about the detrimental effect of having a college of 140 students, plus faculty and staff, laying claim to our downtown's limited retail parking. The owner of Basilio's, an Italian restaurant directly across from New St. Andrews, explained that he'd purchased his business for $325,000. He offered the city financial proof of the restaurant's profitably before the arrival of New St. Andrews -- and of Basilio's precipitous nose-dive after -- but no one was interested. The Board of Adjustment voted unanimously to grant New St. Andrews a Conditional Use Permit without any conditions. Basilio's is now on the market for $125,000, but who wants a restaurant without adequate parking?
Bob Greene, the owner of Main Street's BookPeople, spoke against the permit, as did Kathy Gessler of Sweet Peas and Sage, a florist who relies on the Jackson Street parking lot adjacent to the college. Several private citizens spoke against the Conditional Use Permit, most emphasizing the simple fact that educational institutions do not belong in the Central Business District because they are demonstrably detrimental to retail. It's very simple: inadequate downtown parking means a reduction in downtown business. New St. Andrews' unsubstantiated (and unlikely) claim that 140 NSA students spend a total of $2 million per year at various downtown businesses were certainly not evident in the testimony of the owners of those businesses.
Let's do the math: 140 students spending $2 million per year on dinners, movies, coffee and lingerie would mean each student spends an average of $14,285.71. I've just been going over my American Express bills for 2005. I'm not known for my stinginess, and I shop primarily in downtown Moscow. My totals don't even come close to $14,285.71, and I'm not a student. Technically, I'm gainfully employed.
A parade of students from New St. Andrews spoke before the Board of Adjustment, most prefacing their remarks with profuse thanks for the Board of Adjustment's selfless public service. The faculty and staff of New St. Andrews did much the same; they also presented self-studies the school has conducted to demonstrate that no, no really, NSA is truly a good fit and it belongs downtown. Call me a cynic, but I remain unmoved. In fact, I'm downright hostile to New St. Andrews in its current location.
Here's what should happen when you break the law, as New St. Andrews did with its three -- count 'em -- three zoning violations:
1. You receive an order from the city to cease and desist. You cease and desist.
2. Okay, you didn't cease and desist but instead illegally relocated. The city warns you again and issues you a stiff fine.
3. Third strike and you're out. You pack up your books, your robes, and your dreams of Classical Christian academic grandeur and move to a location that is actually zoned for educational institutions.
You've broken the law, but you don't get away with it. Justice is served and, just as importantly, justice is seen to be served. New St. Andrews is miffed, but they'll get over it. Retail in downtown Moscow is saved.
What should not happen is that the city sits down and rewrites its zoning ordinances in order to accomodate the violator. Here in Moscow, however, that is exactly what happened. A tax-exempt college which began its life in a persistent and deliberate legal muddle is now, with the city's blessing, jeopardizing tax-paying downtown businesses. Where is the justice in that? Where is the equity, the fairness, the concern for one of downtown Moscow's greatest assets, its once-thriving Main Street retail sector?
So be our guest. Move to Moscow. Don't read our comprehensive plan, just be sure to make friends in high places. Then, you can do what you damn well please. Our city council has taken its eye off the ball, and that means you're free to kick it -- kick it all the way to kingdom come.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.




Comments
The report substantiated that NSA is worth $2 million to Moscow; not that the students spend $2m downtown.
Perhaps that's a distinction too hard for an English major to grasp; but it's a significant difference.
And it appears that the rumor mill needs to settle down and this process needs to be more public (or shall I say transparent?). –ljg
The Board of Adjustment worked carefully and in broad daylight to come to a decision granting the CUP. The entire process was transparent but rather lengthy. ljgcats comment that citizens should question what is going on behind the scenes is absurd and insulting to the members of the Board of Adjustment and the Moscow City staff.
Parking was discussed for over two hours. Board members repeatedly pointed out that NSA is not the reason for the parking problem in downtown Moscow. In fact the Board produced photos of the Jackson Street parking lot showing that the southwest corner was empty almost all the time. Also Board members pointed out that local business do not have sufficient parking for their employees who regularly run outside to move their cars from one spot to another to avoid getting a ticket. They agreed that there is no reason to penalize NSA without penalizing the other existing business also.
Two Moscow City Planners, the Moscow City Attorney and the Board of Adjustment agreed that there is no zoning violation and that granting this CUP is the best fit for Moscow in accordance with our Comprehensive Plan. While some disagree, the fit is the best for the entire City of Moscow.
Bob Green didn’t so much speak out against the CUP as he did rant against the Board of Adjustment members and their process. He was extremely rude and did not make any points. He just ranted.
Most restaurants fail in the first few years. Basilio’s is not failing because of parking. The restaurant was dirty and stank of stale garbage rather than smelling yummy like an Italian Restaurant should. Louis said that he couldn’t offer lunch catering to downtown business because of a lack of parking spots. Yet catering and parking don’t necessarily have a cause and effect relationship.
Joan also ignored the positive comments from individuals with no affiliation to NSA or Christ Church but who own downtown businesses made about NSA. They all commented how vibrant the downtown area has become since NSA moved there.
Our system is still intact. Joan is displeased with the results. NSA should exist by right rather than by CUP. If we want to heal our community, we need to let NSA remain where it is and move forward. The complaints are from a small, disgruntled group of individuals who want what they want not what is best for Moscow.
To be fair, Joan is not a journalist. She doesn't have to be fair and balanced, and she doesn't have to correctly and accurately represent the facts.
New West isn't about balanced journalism.
But that's why there's http://right-mind.us
:)
Best,
Dale
I do admit that somehow the name suggests that it can't be inclusive by mere definition with the name "right-mind", unless you intended a more balanced meaning that I am overlooking.
On the other hand, “NewWest” seems to offer a forum of non-religious and non-political affiliation, gathering all views and input.
I will closely consider all sides here.