WILD BILL
Taking a Giant Step Toward Solving the Conflict Between Cyclists and Motorists
By Bill Schneider, 7-27-06
| Signs of the times going up in Lewis and Clark County. Photo by Bill Schneider. | |
Lewis and Clark County in central Montana has taken a step forward in solving the growing conflict between road cyclists and motorists. Hopefully, it will spread like those wildfires do in today’s climatic conditions.
The Lewis and Clark County Commissioners recently approved a pilot project in collaboration with local cyclists to put up Share the Road signs (see photo) on county roads experiencing significant increases in use from cyclists and motorists—and more conflicts and safety issues. The program is intended to promote courteous and safe sharing of public roadways. Locally, the project has been dubbed “Signs of the Times.”
To launch the test program, local cyclists offered to pay for the signs, but county commissioners Anita Varone, Ed Tinsley and Mike Murray liked the concept enough to cost-share it and cover half the cost of the signs with county funds. Local cyclists, mainly members of the Helena Bicycle Club and Great Divide Cycling Team, contributed the rest of the money. In fact more than enough money was raised and, if approved by the county commissioners, will probably be devoted to more signs in the future.
Similar signs have gone up in Colorado and in a few other places in the New West, but not in all the places we need them…yet.
There is no denying that because of the “Lance Affect” (and now, the Floyd Affect), gas prices staying north of three bucks, a growing need for better fitness, and more interest in preventive health care, that the number of cyclists on our roadways will increase. Coupled with that is the rapid growth of the urban interface in many New West communities, and you have a guarantee of more conflict and the likelihood of accidents.
Not many people would disagree with these trends, and now, local governing bodies and transportation and safety coordinators everywhere are trying to deal with the growing conflict. Signs of the Times might be a great way to start.
There seems to be three major ways to deal with the issue: construction, regulation and education.
Special construction i.e. bikeways and extra large shoulders are expensive, but can work well in some cases. However, avid road cyclists, the people in Lycra on expensive bikes who you see more and more of on the roads nowadays, shy away from bikeways even when they’re available for fear of accidents with pedestrians and vehicles overdriving the bikeway when stopping at stop signs. Also, it’s difficult for local officials to keep bikeways and shoulders clear of glass, gravel and other debris, which discourages use by people on pricey, skinny tired racing bikes—and can be very hazardous, especially on descents.
And special regulations limiting either the normal behavior of motorists or cyclists are always contentious. Even though we need revisions of driving manuals (see previous article on this subject) to better reflect current statutes and regulations concerning cycling, in most cases we have adequate laws on the books. Changing them to restrict activity of either group (which are the same people in many cases, incidentally) can quickly grow into the type of controversy local commissioners and council members like to avoid.
That leaves education, and to me, this seems like the best answer. In many places in the world, the sharing of public roads by cyclists and motorists is so engrained into the culture that there is no conflict, even though there are many more motorists and cyclists on narrow roads with no shoulders than we ever see around here. If we could accomplish this here in the New West, the conflicts and scorn for cyclists among motorists might gradually disappear. The Share the Road signs promote this concept.
They are much better than Bicycles on the Road signs, which promote the idea that cyclists are a safety hazard or impediment to driving instead of legitimate users of public roadways. Instead, Share the Road signs promote safety and a new attitude. It’s hard to be against sharing.
I happen to believe, though, that cyclists should expand their view of the concept of sharing. It seems like they not only have the responsibility to share in the expense of the signs and other educational projects, but also share the responsibility to do their part to promote courteous and safe sharing of the roads. Not obeying traffic laws or giving motorists the universal salute do not promote positive culture change but do cause more conflict and hazards.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.




Comments
Cyclists need to get beyond, "I'm better because I'm on a bike" and be willing to show a little courtesy too.
http://www.bicycleretailer.com/bicycleretailer/headlines/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002879597
>>>>>>>>>
Montana Forest Proposition May Close Singletrack Access
JULY 26, 2006 -- BOULDER, CO (BRAIN)—A proposed Montana forest plan revision could set a dangerous national precedent by closing hundreds of miles of singletrack to bicycles. Montana's Bitterroot, Flathead and Lolo National Forests are recommending a new policy that will ban bicycles from trails in many roadless areas where access is currently allowed.
More than 400 miles of trail in seven roadless areas near Missoula are at risk, including many epic routes cherished by local cyclists. Some of the best trails include Heart Lake, Monture Creek, Bluejoint Creek and Blodgett Canyon. The Great Burn area alone contains 139 miles of singletrack that will be made off-limits to bicycles.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<
But, bikes are subject to all the same laws as motor vehicles- and deserve the same respect. When was the last time you saw a motorist honk their horn at an elderly driver-"Hey old man, get outta the way!" pretty rude, huh? But I have experienced an increasing rash of drivers honking at my while on my bike recently- even though I have the same rights and responsibilities as any slow, cautious driver.
Perhaps thats becasue I ride in the right-hand tire track as a car approachs from behind. I move to the right of this position only when oncoming traffic makes it impossible for the car behind me to pass.
Riding in the right-hand tire track is completely legal; I do it for several reasons: 1) as Bill mentions, there is a lot of gravel and glass over at the edge of the road. Thats not safe. 2) Motorists have better visibility of a bkie right in front of them; cowering at the edge of the road makes it easier for the oblivious driver to not see a biker, clip his or her elbow, and ....
I demand that vehicles treat me as another vehicle, including NOT giving me the right of way when I don't have it. For example, when I pull up at a stop sign, and some motorist stops as if I were a pedestrian, to allow me to cross, I refuse, and instead keep waiting until they get tire of waiting for ME, and go ahead. The motorist is being very polite, but no, thank you. Yes, it smacks a bit of feminists taking offense at the gentleman opening the door, but that's how it'll have to be until motorists and cyclists are equal on the road.
Just a thought. But as a motorist I personally decided years ago ~ right about the time people started pulling guns out from under their seats ~ that driving *defensively* was better for my own health and well-being and if I could figure out WHO wanted WHICH PART of any roadway it was theirs to have if I could RE-act in time to give it to them.
Being "right" or being "legal" will not guarantee that you will live to tell about it.
In spite of the fact that I live on a State highway that has, for the most part, a paved shoulder area where cyclists can ride with little risk it is also a two-lane road that is heavily trafficked by commuters, trucks and tourists, all with their own special brand of danger riding shotgun. In addition to that, this roadway is frequented by cyclists as a training ground, including Olympic athletes, because of the rolling terrain that offers them endurance challenges. That terrain they love also hinders visibility in both directions for all who drive upon it.
I live in fear of someday cresting a hill at designated highway speed and having to make an *immediate* and *instinctive* reaction to a semi coming toward me at full speed with inside wheels encroaching over the centerline and a cyclist pedaling in that right-hand tire track in my lane of traffic. I would not like to have to make that *instinctive* decision on the spur of any moment as to whether or not I would have the honor of driving head-on into a semi or running into a cyclist that appeared in my line of vision with no time to brake. An inborn survival *instinct* would most likely make me veer away from a head-on collision with a semi ... or so it seems to me.
It is better to be safe than sorry me-thinks. And riding a bike in a lane of traffic on a State highway with a cruise speed of 55 - 75 mph is not a safe thing to do. I have seen cyclists do this even as they look over their shoulder and it is obvious to them that they are holding up vehicle movement for miles to their rear. All it would take is one "rear-ender" on the tag end of that line of traffic and no tellin' how many dead bodies will be drug from the heap.
Driving is dangerous for all concerned and all drivers of any number of wheels are not competent, considerate ~ or sober and drug-free, for that matter.
So go right ahead and enter any roadway with your legal "rights" and your "demands" intact if you have the intestinal fortitude to do so. The devil WILL take the hindmost ~ it is only a question of WHEN and whether or not you live to tell about it.
But it is my CHOICE to drive defensively to the best of my ability. So if you want ALL the road it is yours to have if I can only RE-act quick enough to give it to you.
There is no pleasure for anyone to be derived from dragging a bloody corpse out of a mangled mess of steel no matter who drove in on how many pieces of rubber.
To think otherwise is idiocy.
Rose Mary