Firm Date Announced for Gore Speech
Former Vice President Al Gore to Keynote Frank Church Conference on Global Warming at Boise State
By Jill Kuraitis, 12-04-06
As previously reported on New West, former Vice President Al Gore will be the keynote speaker at a January conference titled “Global Warming: Beyond the Inconvenient Truth,” at Boise State University.
The university today announced a firm date of January 22 for Gore's visit.
The 23rd annual Frank Church Conference will feature a number of experts from around the country and the region who will address potential solutions to global warming. The daylong conference is from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. in the Student Union Jordan Ballroom. The day sessions are free and open to the public.
Vice President Gore will give the keynote address at 7 p.m. in the Jordan Ballroom following a 5 p.m. reception at the Banner Bank Building. The Banner Bank has been designated as one of the highest-level LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) buildings in the world.
The vice president’s speech will also be free and open to the public, but advance tickets will be required. Free keynote address tickets will be available at the BSU Student Union Information Desk beginning Jan. 3. A limited number of reserved seating tickets will be available for sale, as well as tickets for the reception and the luncheon. For further information, contact Garry Wenske, executive director of the Frank Church Institute, at (208) 426-2941, or by e-mail at GarryWenske@boisestate.edu.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.




Comments
1) It will take 25 years to un-do the damage done by the Bush Administration (I am an estanged moderate Republican); I believe that only Al Gore, then John Edwards, then Barak Obama can provide a 24-year period of stability (six terms), but only if the end the winner take all system and campaign on a platform of coalitiion government and electoral reform. I hope folks will urge Gore to get back in the saddle.
2) The environment is the most important issue from a planetary sense, but it is NOT going to fly with Joe and Jane six-pack. Economic populism, and restoring the distribution of wealth (which is now so concentrated in America as to invite a violent revolution) has to be the means to the end of saving the planet.
3) Gore's data is well-intentioned by flawed. He was recently gored (pun intended) by a Viscount in the UK, particularly over relying on United Nations data that is severely flawed. I have posted the four links at the Open Source Intelligence Portal Page at http://www.oss.net (today it is the top headline). I believe that between now and November 2008 Al Gore can become the best informed person on the planet, but only if he mobilizes a global public intelligence network and embraces the dissenters and skeptics, in order to produce actionable public intelligence on the ten threats, twelve policies, and eight challengers. Naturally I want to be his pro bono intelligence officer, and I am already funding daily, weekly, and forecast information on these 30 topics.
Best wishes to all
Robert David Steele (Vivas)
by the way, I am in Laramie and it has actually been a very warm early winter so far.
It really doesn't matter to me what he does, but it seems rather counter productive to fly all over the country to tell folks to do what he says, not what he does.
Nuclear power is probably the only practical and effective way to address CO2 with expanding world populations. Gore never mentions it as the real alternative power source, and nor does Gore address growing population as the main driver for increasing CO2. He reminds me of the TV preacher who verbally whips his flock into a bloody state for "sinning," meanwhile the preacher lives a princely life while satiating all of his mortal appetites.
You right-wing nutjobs don't understand that God would really want you to protect His creation instead of disregarding it. Why don't you open up your closed brain and recognize the issues of the day? Instead, all you people do is spout uneducated trash. You must not notice the thick haze that envelopes Boise nowadays?
Idaho and the USA deserves far better. Al Gore for President 2008.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/artsentertainment/2003021512_gore28.html
"I'm carbon neutral, and so's my family, so are both of my businesses. Becoming carbon neutral is really not that hard. It's surprising." From an interview with the Seattle Times.
Also, those of you foolishly cackling about the big storms in the Mountain West should think a little bit. Big storms are one of the predicted effects of Global Warming. Big snow dumps actually represent huge energy transfers in the form of evaporated water from the oceans (in this case, the warm el Nino). How cold is it in Colorado, overall?
Here in Wisconsin, we don't have any frost in the ground and we've had shirtsleeve weather for weeks. It's almost January! We have green grass!
Global warming is exactly that--Global. Your particular backyard doesn't prove a thing, even if you are actually colder than normal, which is statistically doubtful.
Fact is we are releasing carbon into the atmosphere at an unprcedented rate. Never in the history of time on this planet has carbon been introduced into the atmosphere at the rate that we are currently able to achieve. The effects of this huge carbon build-up are irrefutable. We have already changed this planet's atmosphere and, by extension, the weather patterns. It's really too late to worry if this will have an effect on our future or not....it will. We simply need to understand, at this point, what that will mean for us and should we be concerned enough to change our habits and try to stabilize the situation going forward. Bickering and finger pointing now is of little help. This is the time to understand the consequences and take action.
Why does no one ever comment on the effect of all of the miles of black asphalt strung across this country as having an effect on the surface temps that we can measure? That is where a lot of the concern comes from it seems, from highs and lows in various places. Cities are always warmer that the surrounding areas. Maybe changing the color of the roads, streets, and highways would save some of the anguish.
By the way I don't consider a failed politician that cannot seem to hold a regular job and has the time and money to fly around in a private jet burning hundreds of gallons of fuel an expert on much of anything. I am not going to support his continued burning of resources by contributing any money to him.
Here are two bedtime stories for you:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16457787/?GT1=8921
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16465430/from/RS.4/
Enjoy, honey.
The weather is prone to short-term fluctuations, and forecasters said the mild winter does not necessarily mean global warming is upon us. In fact, the Plains have been hit by back-to-back blizzards in the past two weeks.
“No cause for alarm. Enjoy it while you have it,” said Mike Halpert, head of forecast operations at the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration’s Climate Prediction Center.
We have a moral obligation to our kids' kids to do something about this, but the happy news is it's doable.
The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is easy to calculate. A certain amount is generated every time a relative amount of fossil fuel is burned (this includes coal). We currently have the capacity to burn more fossil fuels than at any other time in the history of the planet. One could argue that this CO2 is needed for our vegitation to survive and that it is then converted into O2 for us to breathe. There is truth in this as recent tests on certain plants (poisen ivy) have shown that they, in fact, do grow faster (and more toxic) in a CO2 rich enviroment. But you have to consider that our plants on this planet are not increasing to meet the demand of the increased CO2, they are deceasing as the human population is expanding on the globe. Your question about asphalt is an interesting thought, however, the issue with global warming is not so much about the warmth as it is about the cold. As the CO2 accumulates in our atmosphere it reflects more of the sun's rays away from our planet and actually helps to cool or planet while at the same time trapping what heat we have accumulated on the surface and concentrating it in ways that dramatically alter our weather patterns. Eventually the surface heat will diminish and without the rays of the sun able to reach the planet surface we will plunge into an "ice age". Your rediculus banter about "all the pollution" Al Gore is contributing to the problem as he flies around the country is nonsense. If .001% of the nation cut back their driving by.01% this would more than offset what possible damage Al might be doing as he travels around the world sounding the alarm. It will only take a little effort on everybody's part to dramatically cut the current CO2 emmissions and maybe save our future on this planet.
But everyone obviously knows this...
Joan: "http://www.climatecrisis.net/thescience/".
Marion, these little things that begin with "http://" are shortcuts to websites. You can actually click on them and they take you right to the site. Amazing, I know. So go to the aforementioned site, click on "Take Action", and then read up on "What You Can Do" before making another comment on this webpage. I assume you could do wonders with reducing methane emissions.
What about the 300,000 dead in 25 years, that is supposed to be double what there is now? Can you direct me to a link where 150,000 folks have died due directly to global warming?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16484386/from/RS.4/
I suppose you'll just say you don't eat fish anyway...
mod=opinion&ojcontent=otep
Will Al Gore Melt?
By FLEMMING ROSE and BJORN LOMBORG
January 18, 2007; Page A16
...Clearly we need to ask hard questions. Is Mr. Gore's world a
worthwhile sacrifice? But it seems that critical questions are out of the question. It would have been great to ask him why he only talks about a sea-level rise of 20 feet. In his movie he shows scary sequences of 20-feet flooding Florida, San Francisco, New York, Holland, Calcutta, Beijing and Shanghai. But were realistic levels not dramatic enough? The U.N. climate panel expects only a foot of sea-level rise over this century. Moreover, sea levels actually climbed that much over the past 150 years. Does Mr. Gore find it balanced to exaggerate the best scientific knowledge available by a factor of 20?
http://www.ourcivilisation.com/aginatur/prog1.htm#suspend
P. S. is Al still wearing earth tones?
http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/archives/energy_policy/001061hypocrisy_starts_at_.html
for the search; global warming, little ice age, weather trends, stuff like that mike then don't just read those that agree with what you already think, read opposing views too.
I really don't disagree with you about the weather it's just the cause of it, aliens really Cause Global Warming!!!
Keep up the good cllear thinking Mike and remember the name calling you add to the discustion make your argument so much stronger.
Sorry my friend if I appear to be a name-calling condescending conservative under most circumstances I try not to stoop to the level of a name-caller, but after reading the posts ranting against any who might question the global warming view-point I guess I just lost it. I feel the reason there are post with opposing views is because we on the right are interested in both sides of a very important issue, and I'm sorry but Al Gore is the last person I who's word I will take on the issue. I'm sure my mentioning Al Gore will set off more libs but it's how I feel (there a lib phrase for you 'how I feel')
By the way you misspelled my new word of the day "condescending".