IN CRISIS MODE AFTER RECENT ESCAPED ELK CONTROVERSY
Idaho Hunters Going for Ban on Canned Hunts, Limits on Game Farms
By Bill Schneider, 9-19-06
In the contentious aftermath of the escape of up to 160 domestic elk from a 200-acre game farm near Rexburg, Idaho, on the west edge of Yellowstone National Park, hunters in the Gem State have decided this is the time to go for a ban on these "shooter bull operations."
In a NewWest interview, Mark Bell, President of the Idaho Sportsman's Caucus, said his coalition would be "relentless" in pursuing an end to what he calls "high-fence shooting" of elk. "It's not hunting, so I won't call it hunting."
"We believe the facts indicate that the escaped animals were not properly tagged, were not monitored, and, once escaped, were not reported as required," Bell explained. "The implications of such escapes include not only passing diseases to wild populations, but polluting the genetic makeup of elk herds in Idaho, as well as in Montana and Wyoming, and in this instance, the famous Yellowstone herd. Such effects could be disastrous for those herds."
Bell said his coalition of 26 sportsman's groups, including national groups like the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation and Safari Club International is already drafting a bill for the upcoming Idaho legislature. "If we can't get the legislature to pass it," Bell said, "we will go for a ballot initiative."
The coalition's website lists the member organizations and claims to represent 18,384 Idaho sportsmen and women.
That is the same scenario played out in Montana. After several failed attempts to get a meaningful bill through the Montana legislature, hunters put the issue on the ballot and passed it with the leadership of the Montana Wildlife Federation. The Montana initiative placed an outright ban on shooting of captive wildlife and put tough restrictions on game farms that is expected to result in a gradual phase out of such operations. The 2000 law, which is still being debated in the courts, disallows the expansion of game farms or the transfer of the license from the current owners.
Bell said his group is studying the Montana approach, but he does not know if that's the route Idaho will take. Idaho hunters could also go for an outright ban as Wyoming did in 1975.
Oregon and Washington also have bans on game farming in place.
"With public sentiment the way it is now with the recent escape of the those elk," he explained, "we don't see any need to allow or accelerate high fence shooting. This situation points out the pitfalls with allowing it."
"I wish we would have been more proactive," he admitted. "Now, we're in a crisis mode. All of a sudden the barn is on fire and we don't know if the fire truck is coming."
Bell is confident they can do it now, though. He pointed out that his group managed to kill a bill in the last legislature that would have allowed the importation of exotic cervids into Idaho. This would have meant not just caribou, reindeer and red deer coming to Idaho, but all cervids like the pudu, brocket, guemal and muntjac. (Haven't even heard of them? Well, you can thank the Idaho Sportman's Caucus for that.)
"Idaho’s wildlife and hunting heritage are too great a resource to all of Idaho to allow them to be placed at such grave risk by the actions of just a few merely for personal gain," Bell concluded.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.




Comments
Client arrives at game farm. Client cuts Big check to purchase animal. ( Animal is still technically alive here) Game farm operator takes client out to shoot "his" animal. Nope, client didn't pay to shoot the critter, he bought it live and then killed it.
I don't know how all that played out in court. I believe the MWF has fought that, and other aspects of this law that have been attached by shooting pen operators as well.
But, a word of caution to the Idaho Sportsmens Caucus- make sure the language in your bill is airtight, so that Rex Rammell nor anyone else can wriggle out and around from it. It looks like he's good at that.
That is a super question, and I did some research for you. With the help of the Montana Wildlife Federation, I've pasted the two key provisions of the Montana law below.
Basically, though, this says that you can't sell a live animal on an alternate livestock facility i.e. game farm. This would prevent a game farmer from selling a bull elk for $6,000 and then letting the guy shoot "his" elk. The guy would have to transport the elk off of the facility, but to do take a live animal off of the facility, he must become a fully licensed game farmer, which nobody really would do.
Hope this helps.
Bill
87-4-414. Alternative livestock as private property -- source -- marking -- fee shooting prohibited. (1) All alternative livestock lawfully possessed on a licensed alternative livestock ranch are private property for which the licensee is responsible as provided by law.
(2) The licensee may acquire, breed, grow, keep, pursue, handle, harvest, use, sell, or dispose of the alternative livestock and their progeny in any quantity and at any time of year as long as the licensee complies with the requirements of this part, except ******that the licensee may not allow the shooting of game animals or alternative livestock, as defined in [fcp://@fc.mtwf.org,#6500349../87/2/87-2-101.htm ]87-2-101 or [fcp://@fc.mtwf.org,#6500349../87/4/87-4-406.htm ]87-4-406, or of any exotic big game species for a fee or other remuneration on an alternative livestock facility.
SALE
87-4-415. Transportation, sale, and disposal of alternative livestock -- quarantine. (1) Prior to selling, transferring, transporting, or disposing of one or more alternative livestock, the alternative livestock ranch licensee shall request an inspection of the alternative livestock, which inspection must be completed by a department of livestock designated agent. All dead alternative livestock must be reported to the department of livestock within 1 working day of the discovery of the death.
(2) (a) Inspection under subsection (1) must be conducted pursuant to [fcp://@fc.mtwf.org,#6500349../81/3/81-3-203.htm ]81-3-203(1) through (3) and must include the number, species, age, sex, and individual identification numbers of alternative livestock transported or disposed of.
(b) A copy of the certificate of inspection must be provided by the
department of livestock to the department within 10 days of inspection.
(3) The department of livestock may quarantine or issue a hold order on any alternative livestock pending inspection and health certification. The department shall notify the department of livestock regarding the importation or transportation of any alternative livestock that the department reasonably believes may be infected with a disease specific to wildlife.
As described in code, alternative livestock cannot be disposed of by any person except the licensed alternative livestock owner "on an alternative livestock facility."
Further, only a licensed alternative livestock owner can buy and receive living alternative livestock.
So the only person who can fit through this tiny loophole would be another licensed alternative livestock operator, who, after full inspection etc, bought an animal, transported it to his licensed facility and then disposed of, or "hunted" it.