Tancredo Watch

Congressman’s Latest Proposal Would Change Constitution


By Howard Rothman, 11-13-05

 
 

U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo, Colorado's most quotable elected official, is at it again in his high-profile fight against illegal immigration. Now, he wants to change the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in an effort to eliminate so-called "birthright citizenship" – a 150-year-old clause that bestows automatic citizenship on on anyone born in the U.S. But while the proposal floated this week has, not surprisingly, gained its share of supporters, even some conservatives are joining with liberals to denounce it as a terrible idea.

Arguments by opponents of the proposal center on the fact that framers of the 14th Amendment knew exactly what they were doing when they decided to guarantee that "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." As the Washington Post points out in a strongly worded Saturday editorial, the Amendment does not say "all persons except children of illegal immigrants, (nor) all persons except those Congress exempts in moments of nativism. (It says) all persons."

Such a reaction from an admittedly liberal editorial page won't really turn any heads. What may, however, is the equally quick and equally negative response from some on the opposite side of the aisle like The Conservative Voice -- a blog that generally supports the Colorado Congressman's position that the immigration issue should be addressed -- but not in this manner. "This is the land of opportunity as well as a country built upon immigration," Warner Todd Huston wrote over the weekend, "and we mustn't change that aspect of our nation over a temporary border problem with our neighbor or a security issue that will not always stay imminent."

Tancredo does have his supporters, naturally. A column in Saturday's Charlotte Observer calls the Congressman an "expert on immigration law" and relays his estimate that there are 300,000-350,000 of these births each year. The author of this piece is among those who wholeheartedly agrees that elimination of the so-called "birthright citizenship" clause is a fine idea, and one that Congress should immediately consider.



Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.

NEW WEST FEATURES                                                                 More>>

Advertisement

Comments

By Dave Gorak, 11-13-05
By Josef Hala, 11-13-05
By V. Dvorak, 11-13-05
By Dave Gorak, 11-13-05
By Unhappy American, 11-14-05
By James Larson, 11-14-05
By Texas reader, 11-14-05
By Paul Karmi, 11-20-05

Your Comment

Comment policy:

NewWest.Net encourages robust and lively, but civil participation from our readers. By posting here, you agree to the NewWest.Net terms of service. You agree to keep your comments on topic, respectful and free of gratuitous profanity. Contributions that engage in personal attacks, racism, sexism, bigotry, hatred or are otherwise patently offensive will be subject to removal.

Other than using a filter that scans for comment spam, we do not moderate contributions before they are posted and we do not review every thread, so we ask that you help us in keeping the discussions civil and appropriate. Please email info@newwest.net to notify us of comments that may violate these guidelines. Thanks for your help and cooperation. Click here for some tips on how to best interact on NewWest.Net.

You must be a registered user to submit comments, if you are not, register here for free.


Name

Email

Remember my name and email address.

Notify me of follow-up comments.

Advertisement
 

Marketplace