Ad usum proprium
Gorge Property Rights Activists Stick Together As GLUE
By Dan Richardson, 10-09-06
The Dalles Chronicle has reported that the usual activists, the property rights rebels against the crushing might of the Columbia Gorge National Scenic Area, have transmogrified. That’s right, Gorge Landowners United is no more. Now, the activists rally under the banner of Gorge Land Use Equity.
GLUE. As in, sticks like. As in, they’re all over the property rights front, struggling to right the wrongs foisted on hapless property owners by the over-weaning Gorge Commission, and they’re not going anywhere, thank you very much.
Heroes, really. That’s how I think of them. Brave souls like Steven B. Andersen, a private property consultant from Mosier; resort-owners Geoff Thompson and Angelo Simione of Corbett; letter-writer extraordinaire Bobbie Miller of The Dalles; and activist Rita Swyers of Hood River.
Each has a story to tell about standing up to The Man. (Or, really, since the Gorge Commission’s most recent and past executive director have been women, and since the patron saint of the pro-planning Friends of the Columbia Gorge is also female, The Woman.) And now, they’re telling them loud and clear.
(Okay, actually, they formed GLUE back in July and didn’t really tell anyone in, like, the media.)
But they have a common voice. From GLUE’s Internet manifesto:
“Regulatory power has exceeded its authority and has established land use prohibitions and restrictions that have deprived affected Gorge landholders of the reasonable use of their property without compensation and adversely affected all Gorge residents by inhibiting reasonable economic development necessary to their future.”
You don’t have a job? It’s the National Scenic Area’s fault. You can’t open a gravel pit next to the river? Yep. The prohibitionists strike again.
But fear not: GLUE is not from the government, and it’s here to help.
One thing I didn’t notice on the GLUE web site: A motto. A rallying cry. That would be a useful, unifying thing, I think. If it were in Latin, it could add some pizzazz, too, a sense of sophistication. Now, I know you smart-acres would suggest “ad captandum vulgus,” and that does possess a certain ring. (What a snappy bumper sticker!) But in truth, GLUE’s motto really ought to be “ad usum proprium.”
Ad usum proprium. For one’s own use.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.




Comments
Glad to know we can count on you for suggestions. But I think "ad astra per aspera" has a nicer ring.
--Steven B
Hint: Reread the "ad captandum vulgus" bit.
Cheers, Dan
PS: Using "you people" is no way to encourage "them" to listen to you.
I think, perhaps, Dan Richardson is being sarcastic. The Scenic Area has protected the Gorge from developers for many years, but it won't last if we aren't vigilant. Your ire is justified, if a little off target.
And Stevie B, you're a pillar.
A pillar, huh, Jon? I think I like that.
Steven B
------------------------------------------
"The protection of property rights is a crucial pillar of a free society and a necessary condition for the protection of all individual rights," said Dr. Yaron Brook, executive director of the Ayn Rand Institute.
"Every American who values his freedom and his individual rights should be deeply concerned about the government's power to use eminent domain and should support just compensation of property owners adversely affected by the government's actions.
"As Ayn Rand stated, 'Without property rights, no other rights are possible.'"
------------------------------
Something to remember, Mariel, next time you set pen to paper knowing you have the right to use it (so far, that is). Enjoy it while you still can in this country. It may not be for long.
--Steven B.
Ayn Rand wrote some entertaining novels but her "philosophy" is pretty thin.
If you control a person's property, you pretty much can dictate everything else. On its face, I would say Ayn nailed it. What you seem to be saying is that whatever the government granteth it may rightfully taketh away (without compensation of course). The more of us that buys in to that, the sooner we will lose what was initially stated to be inherent. And then we will be dependent on you and your comrades to decide for us how we are to live. Creativity and innovation will become yesterday's news. I'm not too excited about that kind of future for my grandchildren. So I don't think you will discourage me, nor will you convince me that defending my house at gunpoint from a malevolent government is something not worth dying to defend. And any government that takes away rights it has granted to its citizens without compensating them for their loss is just that. --Steven B