Headscarves, Secularism, and Religious Freedom
By Nick Gier, Unfiltered 8-16-08
By Nick Gier
I thought I would never get a consulting job until the day that the ACLU gave me a call. Some Muslim prisoners in the Boise penitentiary were complaining that the warden was forcing them to cut off their beards.
For $25 an hour I agreed to research the issue of beards and religion and write a report. I interviewed Muslim imams and Jewish rabbis, and I found that certain sects of each did indeed require beards as part of male religious identity.
Certain sects of orthodox Judaism do not even allow the trimming of beards because they read: "You shall not round off the hair on your temples or mar the edges of your beard" (Leviticus 19:27).
I also discovered that Sikh men may never cut their hair or their beards. Sikh women also must cover their heads, and they may not remove hair from any part of their bodies.
The Jewish Talmud requires that women cover their hair while in public, and Orthodox Jews still follow that tradition. In earlier times Roman Catholic women had to cover their heads during Mass, following Paul's injunction that a "woman who prays with her head unveiled dishonors her head" (1 Cor. 11:5). Some Pentecostal, Independent Baptist, and Mennonite women cover their heads in public as well as in church.
The passage most often cited from the Qur'an (24:31) has more to do with general modesty, although the specific injunction to cover the bosom with a veil does of course imply veil wearing, a common custom for women in the Middle East and now seen by many Muslims as a religious requirement for their women.
Recently Abercrombie Kids refused to hire a Muslim woman because she was told that her headscarf did "not fit the Abercrombie image." Abercrombie's own Code of Business Conduct and Ethics prohibits discrimination on the basis of religion, and religious headscarves are now explicitly included in new guidelines from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
The Muslim headscarf (hijab) can be worn in several ways: very loosely as former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto did; completely covering the hair; or covering the head except for the eyes.
U.S. citizen Sultana Freeman is now suing the State of Florida because she refused to show her full face for a photo required for a driver's license. Freeman's attorney believes that she will win her right to drive on the basis of legal precedent, because 14 other states have made exceptions for Christians who claim that taking photographs of them is a violation of the Second Commandment.
General American tolerance of the hijab stands in contrast to French intolerance. A 2004 law prohibiting the wearing of hijab in France's public schools was passed by a vote of 494-36 in National Assembly. Recently a Moroccan woman was denied French citizenship because she wore the burqa, which covers the entire body.
Most Americans and Europeans are proud of their commitment to a liberal secular democracy in which church and state are kept separate. But the Latin word "liberalis" means "pertaining to the free person," and a liberal society should protect, first and foremost, its citizens' right to the free exercise of their religious beliefs, as long as those beliefs to do infringe on the rights of others.
Turkey's radical secularists have also been undermining the liberal foundations of their modern nation. Over the years the Republican People's Party abolished capital punishment, legalized abortion, extended women's rights, liberalized the economy, but also banned the hijab in public.
In the past several decades there has been an Islamic revival in Turkey, and a moderate Muslim party has won the last two elections, the second one by a 47% margin. Turkey's chief prosecutor brought charges against this party claiming and it had threatened Turkey's secular society by bringing back the hijab in public.
This month the Turkish supreme court ruled 10-1 against the party. The prosecutor had recommended that 70 party members be banned for five years, but that punishment required at least seven judges to rule in favor. The vote was 6-5. One vote the other way would have thrown Turkish society into chaos, and most of the world is now relieved that a crisis has been avoided.
Religious persecution in Europe was one of the primary reasons for the American and French Revolutions, and failure to respect the rights of believers of all faiths will lead us into times just as dark as the religious wars of pre-Revolutionary Europe.
Nick Gier taught religion and philosophy at the University of Idaho for 31 years. Read or listen to his other columns at www.NickGier.com.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.


Comments
Thanks to the suffragettes, women have voices and choices.
But most people are totally in the dark about HOW the suffragettes won.
Now readers can discover the shocking truth of how the suffragettes did it, and it's as easy as opening their e-mail.
"The Privilege of Voting" is a new e-mail series that follows the real lives of eight great women from 1912 - 1920 to reveal ALL that happened to set the stage for women to win the vote in America and England.
Two beautiful and extremely powerful suffragettes -- Alice Paul and Emmeline Pankhurst are featured, along with Edith Wharton, Isadora Duncan, Alice Roosevelt and two gorgeous presidential mistresses.
There is a LOT of heartache for our heroines on the rocky road to the ballot box - but in the end - they WIN!
Presented in a unique sequential e-mail series -- each exciting episode is about 10 minutes -- perfect to enjoy during coffeebreaks, or anytime.
Subscribe free at
http://www.CoffeebreakReaders.com/tpovpage.html
Thus the non-religious folks, or likely Christians, at Abercrombie, Boise Penitentiary, and State of Florida are not up to snuff about religious freedom. And on the other hand, Turkey's religious fanatics are not up to snuff about freedom FROM religion. We have some of that here in Colorado. We cannot buy whiskey on Sunday, and I don't think it was an accident that Sunday was they day they chose to close the liquor stores.
As always, we are in dangerous waters when we force our personal beliefs on others, whether they are religious or cultural.
On another matter, I object to the use of the term Secular. A non-religious person is said to be a Secular Humanist. When one sect in a form of religion (i.e Sunni) is fighting another sect of the same religion (Shi'a), it is not a religious war, but a Secular war. When an individual church is not recognized by the headquarters it is said to be a Secular Church. Sometimes Secular mean atheist, sometimes just a different religion.
In your last paragraph I'm afraid that you are confusing "secular" with "sectarian." The conflict between the Sunni and the Shia is one between "sects" of Islam. And religious fundamentalists of all sects focus on the modern "secular" world as the source of all ill.
Thanks for writing.
Nick Gier