medical marijuana
Montana Marijuana Law to be Tested
By Dana Green, 4-24-06
A California man is trying to use the Montana medical marijuana law as a defense, after being busted with more than four pounds of pot. But medical marijuana law proponents say he’ll have to prove it was really for medicinal purposes.
Last year, Montana voters became one of 11 states allowing medical use of marijuana under a registry system. The man, who was arrested in Butte, claimed to be a patient using medical marijuana in California. Bruce Mirken, spokesman for the Medical Marijuana Project, the national organization that helped pass the Montana law, said Montana does recognize ID cards from other states.
But the Montana law limits possession to one ounce of usable marijuana or six plants, Mirken said.
“He is well in excess of (that),” Mirken said. “He’s going to have to prove he’s a legit patient, and that he legitimately needed that much.”
The amount used by patients across the country, largely for easing pain or nausea, has varied. For some, “a few puffs when they’re taking their pills is all they need,” Mirken said. But others in chronic, severe pain have been prescribed up to 10 ounces a month.
“It’s not unusual in that condition to go through several pounds a year,” he added.
Medical marijuana has been hot in the news lately – after the Supreme Court declared state laws did not protect patients from federal prosecution, In response, Congress will vote in June on the Hinchey amendment, which would stop federal agents from going after patients using in states with medical marijuana laws. Sen. Conrad Burns announced his support for the Hinchey amendment.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.


Comments
The Montana medical marijuana law also provides for an affirmative defense, which means any person charged with "any" marijuana crime may claim that the reason for the 'crime' was medical in nature, and if a physician confirms this, the authorities are obligated to drop the charges. (http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/mca/50/46/50-46-206.htm)
Also, to quibble with terminology used in this and many other articles -- medical marijuana cannot be "prescribed" anywhere in the US. A prescription implies FDA approval and pharmacy supply; these condtions do not exist currently.
Another way to look at this problem is, who are you to tell people they don't have a right to treat whatever medical problems they have?
Well aLs, they can legally use Marinol.
http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/ongoing/marinol.html
Like every drug, Synthetic THC (Marinol) works for some people but not everyone - it's NOT the same as cannabis. Not to mention some people are so sick and nauseated that they can't even keep the pill in their stomach. Cannabis been used by civilizations for thousands of years to treat a variety of conditions where prescription medications such as Vioxx or Marinol were tested likely for less than 10 years. Definately not thousands of years since the FDA has only been around since around 1930. Prescription drugs are dangerous and kill people and there has never been a single report of anyone overdosing from cannabis.
Are you aware that there are seven patients that receive regular legal Medical Marijuana from the U.S. government? If marijuana truly had no benefit, why does our government continue to send these patients their medicine? How are these seven patients any different than a patient in Montana or anywhere else in our country? The government talks about how they don't want to send "mixed messages" to the kids by legalizing medical marijuana but talk about a mixed message!
I can understand you not supporting recreational marijuana. But this is about patients and I think we and our government should have compassion for these people that are suffering.