Recession rattles timber industry to its core


Unfiltered By Matthew Koehler, Unfiltered 10-28-09

 
 

A few days ago, the Missoulian ran an article titled, "Battered and Boarded: Recession rattles timber industry to its core." (see http://missoulian.com/article_6d12ad82-c005-11de-a437-001cc4c002e0.html)

Here are some quick snips from that article:

"The Western Wood Products Association estimates that 45 percent of all lumber goes to new home construction. But new home starts have been more than halved since reaching a high of more than 2 million in 2005. Since that year, the nation's demand for lumber has dropped 55 percent, the steepest decline in industry history"...

"National demand for lumber, which pegged 64.3 billion board feet in 2005, is predicted to fall below 30 billion board feet this year, with the amount of lumber used to build new homes dropping from 28 billion board feet to about 5 billion board feet. Making matters worse is the fact that log prices have not fallen at the same rate, meaning mills are paying more for raw materials while selling product for less."

It's interesting to note that all the economic reality contained in this article has been systematically ignored by Senator Jon Tester, his staff and those three or four conservation groups who actually support Tester's Mandated Logging Bill.

For more info on Tester's Logging Bill, check out these links:

http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/testers_wilderness_bill_updates/C41/L41

http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/tester_forest_bill_questions_and_opportunities/C41/L41/

http://missoulanews.bigskypress.com/missoula/war-of-words/Content?oid=1162300

Just imagine, after decades and decades of over-consumption and over-development (which have caused a host of environmental and social problems in our country) we've come to a point in the public lands forest/wilderness movement where groups such as Montana Wilderness Association, National Wildlife Federation and Montana Trout Unlimited are actually looking to use their political connections to mandate more logging on public lands, despite the steepest decline in demand for lumber in our nation's history.

With demand for lumber, excess packaging and disposable paper products (thankfully) in such a steep decline (and not expected to rebound anytime soon) wouldn't sensible conservationists and progressives, if anything, advocate for less public lands logging at this very important point in our nation's history?



Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.

NEW WEST FEATURES                                                                 More>>

Advertisement

Comments

By steve kelly, 10-28-09
By Derek, 10-29-09
By bearbait, 11-05-09

Your Comment

Comment policy:

NewWest.Net encourages robust and lively, but civil participation from our readers. By posting here, you agree to the NewWest.Net terms of service. You agree to keep your comments on topic, respectful and free of gratuitous profanity. Contributions that engage in personal attacks, racism, sexism, bigotry, hatred or are otherwise patently offensive will be subject to removal.

Other than using a filter that scans for comment spam, we do not moderate contributions before they are posted and we do not review every thread, so we ask that you help us in keeping the discussions civil and appropriate. Please email info@newwest.net to notify us of comments that may violate these guidelines. Thanks for your help and cooperation. Click here for some tips on how to best interact on NewWest.Net.

You must be a registered user to submit comments, if you are not, register here for free.


Name

Email

Remember my name and email address.

Notify me of follow-up comments.

Advertisement