Guest Opinion
Taxpayers Can’t Afford to Wait for Mining Law Reform
By Alan Bernholtz, Guest Writer, 5-03-10
![]() |
|
| The town of Crested Butte | |
Even with Americans worrying about record budget deficits and struggling through recession, the mining industry is exploiting an antiquated federal law to fleece taxpayers as it makes enormous profits off public lands.
Federal law governing hardrock mining – a legislative relic unchanged since President Ulysses S. Grant signed it in 1872 – lets mining companies buy public land for next to nothing, take the public’s buried treasure without paying a cent in royalties and then stick the public with staggering bills for the pollution and other environmental problems left behind.
As NBC Nightly News recently highlighted in its “Fleecing of America” series, the 1872 General Mining Law gives federal land away for $5 an acre or less and exempts multinational corporations from paying taxes for the minerals they take. Miners get rich while handing taxpayers an estimated $50 billion bill to restore lands and watersheds devastated by mining.
Congress wrote the mining law 138 years ago to encourage pick-and-shovel prospectors to strike out for the unsettled West. Unchanged, the law now grants even foreign mining companies priority over other land uses, making it nearly impossible to limit mining in critical areas, regardless of harm to habitat, water supplies and other natural resources.
I moved to the historic mining town of Crested Butte in 1988 as a 20-year-old who just wanted to ski. I later became its mayor. Now I’m fighting for the fate of my town, its water and our recreation-based economy. Thompson Creek Metals Co. proposes to develop a massive molybdenum mine a mile upstream of town. The Mount Emmons Project threatens to dump hundreds of thousands of tons of toxic waste into our municipal watershed, affecting everyone who lives and works downstream.
This story is playing out all over the West. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says mining has degraded 40 percent of Western watersheds. The harm spreads far beyond the mine mouth. Many affected streams, for example, feed the Colorado River, which supplies millions of people with drinking water in Las Vegas and Los Angeles.
Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-NM), chairman of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, has introduced a bill to ensure the mining industry pays its fair share and cleans up its messes. Oil, gas and coal industries already pay reasonable royalties for resources extracted from public lands. Sen. Bingaman’s bill would require hardrock mining companies to do the same. It also would afford communities a voice in locating mines and give public land managers authority to reject mines in places where clean water and other values are literally more valuable than gold.
Support for the bill is growing in Congress, but its momentum may be slowed by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s re-election campaign in Nevada, a major gold-producing state. Reid can be a strong friend to the environment but also regularly sides with the mining industry. He could lose that industry’s support if fellow Democrats push mining reform this tough election year.
But the public risks losing even more through inaction. Public lands provide clean water for millions of people. They offer access to exceptional fishing, hunting, hiking and camping and support tourism – an important economic driver in the West. We have a shared responsibility to protect these lands for the benefit of all Americans and future generations.
Don’t get me wrong: metals are essential, and mining is an appropriate use of public land. But we depend on public lands for multiple uses. No single industry should have free rein. And, given our country’s tough economic straits, no industry should get a free ride.
The opportunity to pass meaningful mining law reform is at hand. We can’t afford to squander it.
Alan Bernholtz is director of mountain operations for CS Irwin, a backcountry ski guide service in Crested Butte. He was mayor of Crested Butte from 2005-2009.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.





Comments
But the question I have for you is this. The billionaires moved out the millionaires long ago in Crested Butte. And billionaires have LOTS of money to fight these things. Is there no will among the billionaires to pony up the necessary resources to stop this insanity? I don't get it. A mine up there would ruin the town. What gives? Seriously, the money that the billionaires have should be able to stop that mine in its tracks.
Never mind that mining companies that find viable ore pay lots of groovy corporate income taxes, or at least shovel money at employees, suppliers and whatnot, all of whom get hit by the IRS at some point. Even the fat cat stockholders in Palm Beach or Crested Butte get whacked for 15 percent on their dividends.
Never mind that the value of the surface estate, while "priceless" in some eyes, is objectively not very high very often. If it were, those yelling "priceless" would have no problem raising the funds to "save" the object of their desire.
Again, while I don't have a problem with asking fair market value for surface estate, nor a pinch of net smelter royalties, the Bingaman bill allows prohibition using the most arbitrary and capricious stands. Anyone paying attention to the rare-earth issue? You will be darn soon.
Several comments here have been removed.
"Contributions that engage in personal attacks... will be subject to removal."
Please stay on topic and don't use this forum as a stage for your personal sparring.
Courtney
look at the Gulf oil spill: we talked Congress into limiting our dollar liability to about 70 million, and god knows, this is going to cost tens, maybe hundreds, of billions of dollars for clean up and damages to regional economies. guess who pays for that, you, you frightened little insignificant voters?! when you weaklings get done crying in your beer and t.v. popcorn, why don't you continue your losing streak and go fishing? either grow up and be responsible voting citizens who care or just shut up !
Sorry, but when it comes to the environment all that matters is what anyone else is doing. He's a two-faced lying, little schidt with a long history to prove it. He took a job working for a bunch of UK billionaires and has destroyed countless acres of the National Forest with his snowcats no worries about roadless areas, emissions and fuel consumption there. He was the first to violate the water quality standards after getting caught with an illegal water system in his ski hut. Doh!!! I hope the mine comes in and dumps its tailings right in the middle of his yuppie, eliteist operation, and then drives every ore truck right down Elk Avenue right by HCCA, and Alan, Leah and that rat-fart attorney Belkin's house.
For a little belligerant compensator, maybe he should learn to treat his wife with as much care as he puts into the danm peudo-environmental fights around here.
Good riddens!
Butte local.