Guest Opinion
When Tasers Shock More than Lost Votes
By Rebecca Ann, 9-23-07
On balance, the nightly televised news once again failed the nation last week, leaving open the question of who’s the bigger loser.
Given the opportunity to knock a softball out of the park in the bottom of the 9th and bring the long-suffering home team a much-needed win, Big Media whiffed. What’s worse is they got caught looking like overpaid chumps, like Jake LaMotta taking a last nosedive for a fat payoff, instead of going down swinging.
Of course, I’m talking about the mainstream packs’ fraud disguised as objective reporting on the Andrew Meyer’s fiasco at Florida University on Sept. 17. Nearly to a news station and to an anchorman or woman it was about as bad and biased as it gets.
But let me say here that my complaint has nothing to do with whether Meyer’s behavior was legal or illegal.
Further, this jeremiad is not about arguing against whether Glenn “No Neck” Beck or others believe Meyer to be a jerky, self-promoting publicity hound.
Those wrapped up in the self-deceiving schadenfreude of seeing a loud-mouthed Florida J-school student get what was coming to him – and now insist he needs to take ‘responsibility’ for whatever they or Beck might think Meyer was irresponsible in doing – are too busy getting their rocks off getting ahead of the story to get the story.
Those arguments, valid or invalid as they may be, are irrelevant to me. For my indignation is more academic and maybe even metaphysical.
If ever there was a test case to suggest that the modern corporate media apparatus and their gutless apparatchiks are on the take this could be it.
And in the process of solely worshiping their bottom lines and selling their incurious journalistic souls, they’ve dragged all of us into the uniformed abyss of slanted, self-censorship. They have also elevated the integrity, reliability and “truthiness” of that leftwing cabal of anti-corporate news mongers led by Amy Goodman and her whacky “Democracy Now” ilk.
Before this story becomes another unexamined dead horse in the dung heap of discarded and deliberately ignored news worth a second look, the Andrew Meyer’s debacle might just prove the tinfoil hat wearing crowd has a good case.
But first, some housecleaning is in order.
Those who believe they’re sufficiently well-informed on the Meyer’s controversy to have formed an opinion on it one way or the other kindly tell the ‘un-deciders’ among us: What were the three questions Andrew Meyer peppered Sen. John Kerry with before his microphone was cut off?
If your answer contains at least three separate statements, two of which deal with voting and impeachment, there’s a good chance you’re getting your daily news from somewhere besides a television.
However, for those who rely on “CNN” or “Countdown with Keith Olbermann,” there’s a better than average chance you’re unable to recite any of the substance of what set Meyer off on hectoring the senator from Massachusetts before the cops busted up his one-way, one-man debate club in Taserville, U.S.A.
But it’s not your fault. It’s Anderson Cooper’s and Keith’s slack substitute for a co-anchor, Alison Blew-it, or whatever her face is, and their producers’ decisions to present superficial snarky commentary, ignorantly dismissive remarks and highly edited and selective video instead of thoroughly balanced, fact-based reportage.
To say nothing of their complete pass on any contextual analysis or Anderson “keeping them honest”.
While Meyer’s third question about Bush’s and Kerry’s common fraternity to the super secretive Skull & Bones Yaley Society is a well-known fact, what’s less well-known is the foundation for Meyer’s muzzled allegations of widespread electoral shenanigans and the spoilage of millions of votes in 2004.
Don’t believe me?
Check out the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights’ investigation into recent national and statewide voting snafus. And if you’ve got some more time to get up to speed, on this largely buried travesty at the bedrock of our withering democracy, read “Armed Madhouse” by investigative BBC journalist Greg Palast.
For those who don’t know, “Armed Madhouse” was the mysterious yellow book Meyer clutched like the Holy Grail and didn’t let touch the ground as the fuzz whisked him away to their S&M four-way in the back of the classroom.
Lastly, riddle me this: When the hell will our walking while still sleeping American brothers and sisters wake up, avoid the mall or the golf course for a day, and confirm or deny for themselves whether their vote counts as much as the citizen who shines their wingtips or mows their lawn?
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.




Comments
Yes, Andrew Meyer may have been acted like an "inflated clown," but let's not forget he was simply asking a question of a public official, in an open forum, in a public university. It is simply outrageous that he should be hustled away by a half dozen cops because they did not like his words, tone, or gesticulations.
What outraged me more was not merely the manner in which he got manhandled, but that we saw that a fellow citizen's protected First Amendment Freedom of speech was nullified, and no one really cared about it in the mainstream media.
I am waiting for the parodies of this episode. A Senator in a committee meeting or a lawyer before the Supreme Court goes over the time limit and a bunch of cops start wrestling him away and tasering him. Would Ray say that the dissenter got what he deserved?
Rebecca gets beyond the rancour of the immediate incident to uncover the greater outrage. Andrew Meyer's questions asked Sen. Kerry to comment publicly about whether he believed that the election was rigged by Republican dirty tricks, and if he did, why did he do nothing about it. Discussion of this most important allegation should not be stifled, either intentionally by the media or unintentionally by some Florida cops.
The uncovering of the dirty tricks by Greg Palast, who wrote the book Meyer held up and cited to when he questioned Kerry, makes an allegation that Republican dirty tricks took away the voting rights of at least hundreds of thousands of fellow citizens. Apparently, Palast bases his allegation on emails generated within the RNC that were mistakenly sent to a source of his.
There is a silence about why the mainstream media refuses to focus on the substance of Palast's allegations, as inartfully repeated by Meyer's questions? Is the magnitude and horror of the answer really too much for the public to bear?
Or is the problem that the media has given up on reporting since Watergate? Dan Rather reported on Bush's alleged AWOL military reserve service, and lost his career and reputation as a result. Such an episode surely must silence many a reporter, who may not feel as insulated and secure as Mr. Rather. Such a high price if you get it even partially wrong. As a result, it seems that most reporting now is simply getting unofficial press releases from government officials.
Ray, it is much easier to focus in on the simple surface. You could go on to believe that poor Andrew got what he deserved. There is saying that the nail sticking out gets hammered down. It is regularly used in repressive regimes. It shouldn't happen here. I urge you to rethink the episode.
To the stocks for the media and the rapscallion for a little public scourging with words, vegetables, and fruit.
Why do you only focus you questions on the messenger in this story and refuse to address the substance of the message as substantiated by the links to independent sources in this story?
Are you so well-informed that you can knowingly say allegations of voter fraud are baseless and unworthy of comment? Or, are you more afraid of facing the potential psychic trauma of challenging your blind faith in a system you have never bothered to scrutinize?
The First Amendment means that we put up with fools, charlatans, conspiracy advocates and partisans of every stripe, not just people who meekly toss softball questions (or none at all as Fox's Hume performed when Gen. Petraus was on his show).
Naomi Wolf's "Call to Patriots -- Today's Echoes of Goebbels, and the Fragility of Liberty" -- is a good antidote to the Hicks and Moores of this world whose kneejerk reaction to anything they don't like is to shoot the messenger, rather than consider a message that might make them uncomfortable, or God forbid, make them think. (Wolf's book is also quite horrifying, showing how far we've moved toward a fascist takeover.)
Fundamentally, conservatives like Hicks and Moore are intellectually lazy -- they've adopted the world view of 'I've got mine' and anyone who hasn't is just a dirty hippie unworthy of consideration (but might be worth rounding up for incarceration in one of those KBR-built "camps.") whenever Bushco gets around to declaring martial law on some trumped up pretext "emergency."
I agree that we "have to put up with fools and charlatans" to some extent. But, we don't have to take them seriously. Nor do we have to embrace every idiotic "conspiracy advocate" that comes along. At least I don't!
Some things like Andrew Meyer's act, simply lack substance. They do not carry a message of any significance. But, you apparently you feel that they do. That is perhaps, because you are not "intellectually lazy," and would agree with Ahmadinejad that things like the Holocaust deserve further study for verification. But, on the other hand, maybe you wouldn't. Because intellectual pursuits like that are well... just stupid.
Or maybe, it's because you have a deeper insight and can see in the collage of recent events, a move "toward a fascist takeover" in this country. Or the imminent prospect of President Bush (in your parlance "Bushco") invoking "martial law" where others can not.
But like you said, "the First Amendment means that we put up with fools..."
Have you bothered to click on the provided link in the article to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and scrolled through their updates on Hispanic intimidation at the ballot box? Or, another news bulletin on widespread allegations of voter disenfranchisement in 2004, 2000?
What do you know of voting fraud cases winding through the federal courts in Ohio and the destruction of ballots after a federal judge ordered them preserved?
Does the possibility of voting while black and having your vote rejected at the rate of 9 times that of whites in certain parts of this country not contravene certain federal voting rights laws?
Can you tell us how many million votes in the last two presidential cycles were "spoiled"?
Or, are you as inky suggests too intellectually lazy to do any research on this topic? Are you disinterested finding out for your self what the real story is, because you think surely CNN and Anderson Cooper would have by now reported on such potential civil rights violations in one of those high-profile "keeping them honest" CNN ratings grabbers?
Stop trying to shoot the messenger, and start doing your homework, lad. The messengers are only trying to pick up the ball almost everyone else in Big Media has dropped.
People of your persuasion are so astonishingly presumptuous. I am amazed every time one of you open your mouths with your facile admonishments to do your home work. Maybe, just maybe, I reject your sources and find the kind of discourse you engage in nausating.
Do you actually believe that you have the scholarly and intellectual edge on everyone? That you hold the key to the truth and that everyone else is in the shadows? That only you, with your amazing intellect can discern what is hiding in the backdrop of the American political scene, by reading books by Palast and listening to Democracy Now? And that you, with your gifts and exceptional insights are superior to the mainstream? You forthrightly say that accomplished, experienced people like Anderson Cooper or Britt Hume are in the dark, while you, the coffee-shop defenders of righteousness, walk with the angels.
The trouble with you "lad" and your like minded cadre of true believers, is that you simply think that you are better than everyone. That you've got it all figured out. The American public is crude and unsophisticated. Present Bush is stupid. Corporations are evil. The boogyman is coming and only you can stop him. You guys have been singing the same old tired song your Daddies learned from Ramparts Magazine in the 1960's. The American government is bad. Very bad. We are a corrupt evil society, racist and unprincipled. But we can, with your guidance, change.
My God...is there no end to your conceit? There may not be. But there is an end to my patience.
By your knee-jerk responses and ad hominen attacks, it’s now very clear that you haven't done your homework. Further, you appear to be too intellectually paralyzed to definitively answer much less objectively explore any questions relating to well-founded allegations of voter disenfranchisement.
The proof of your irrational approach to acquiring new knowledge is your vain decision to continue to try to kill the messenger before investigating the veracity of such solid sources of credible information as the federal courts and U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
Cheers to your vivid illustration of parochial myopia.
But as Faust might have wished he had asked at the end: What have I gained for it?
Charles Foster Kane
How well you have proved you are a rare bird, indeed.
Talk about the same old song....
Ad hominen attacks.
Do your home work.
Kill the messenger.
(Repeat over and over.)
Parochial Myopia is a good one though.
I've enjoyed bantering with you. I haven't heard a reference to Faust since I left school. But, like I said, there is an end to my patience.
Bye-bye, and good luck to you. (I trust you won't take any cheap shots after I'm gone.)
R.H.