Guest Commentary
Montana Dems Cater to State’s Literal “Center”
By Pete Talbot, 8-04-06
Lewistown, Montana is smack dab in the middle of the state. Are the Democrats sending a subliminal message by holding their platform convention this weekend in the Sapphire City? They aren’t meeting in the left part of the state – at that liberal bastion called Missoula, for example. Nor are they meeting in the right part of the state – Glendive or Miles City or other conservative enclaves. No, the Montana Democratic Party is being centrist.No rocking the boat this year. It’s a love fest. Pick up a U.S. Senate seat, a couple of seats in the Montana Senate and House, and Montana Democrats are back on the map.
Similar to herding cats, keeping Democrats in line can be a challenge. But with the electoral momentum on their side, Democratic Party leadership is working overtime to make sure this convention runs smoothly.
(Every other year, the Democrats, and Republicans, hold a convention somewhere in the state to hone their principles and message. It’s also an opportunity for each party’s candidates to rally the troops.)
This year, because the Republicans are back on their heels, the Democrats just need to hold it together and so they’re playing it safe. The governor will be pushing some alternative energy policies, according to party officials. He’ll also be speaking on behalf of a couple of the ballot initiatives (minimum wage and his own initiative that restricts some lobbying activities) and against other initiatives, especially CI-97 (the initiative that caps state spending). And he’ll be promoting his “square deal” plan for property tax relief.
There are some rumors of discontent within the Democratic Party. There’s a potential plank being advanced by the environmental wing of the party that deals with coal development. While some Democrats advocate more development in the Eastern Montana coalfields, notably Governor Schweitzer’s coal-to-diesel proposal, others want to take a go-slow approach to mining.
Whether a coal plank makes it to the floor of the platform convention for a vote (or what the exact wording will be) remains to be seen.
Then there was that TV commercial talking about U.S. Senate candidate Jon Tester’s support of “traditional marriage” and being against flag burning, paid for by the Montana Democratic Party. Some progressives were upset.
“These are non-issues,” said one party activist. “We shouldn’t rise to the bait.” The bait being a Sen. Conrad Burns TV ad saying gay marriage and flag burning are important issues for Montanans.
Tester explained that there are going to be Tester TV and radio commercials that he has no control over, and this is true. With potentially millions of dollars being poured into Montana to unseat Burns, and with strict laws prohibiting political action committees from talking to candidate campaigns, it will be hard for the Tester camp to always control the message. That’s politics.
Controlling the message coming out of the platform convention should be easier. Democratic leadership, which is basically Schweitzer, Baucus and party apparatchik, will work hard to nip any controversial platform language in the bud.
So the rhetoric coming out of Central Montana should be rather centrist. Jacques Rutten, editor of the Lewistown News-Argus, said he thinks that holding the platform convention in Lewistown, “sends a good message.” He added that although Lewistown basically votes Republican, “people are excited, more so because the governor, a senator and a senate candidate will be speaking here.” Asked about the impact that 300 visiting Democrats might have on the community Rutten said, “hey, we’ll take anybody we can get.”
(I was just informed that because of the death of Sen. Baucus’ nephew, Cpl. Phillip E. Baucus, in Iraq last Saturday, the senator will be with family and not able to attend the convention.)
Guest columnist Pete Talbot will be writing from the Montana Democratic Convention in Lewistown this weekend. Talbot is a film and video producer who works with WestRidge Creative, an advertising firm in Missoula that provides marketing for nonprofits, and coordinates issue and candidate campaigns. He also does freelance film and video production under the name Sterling Productions, a company he founded nearly 30 years ago. Pete is a board member of Missoula’s Sustainable Business Council and treasurer for Missoula Community Access Television (MCAT). Politically, Pete has served on the Montana Democratic Party Executive Board and was chairman of the Missoula County Democrats. [End of article]
Jon Tester’s senatorial campaign needs to find better “seminar writers”. Even born Democrats require more in a national level candidate than carefully crafted lies. Mikenna Maroney’s pathetic [7/25 Daily Inter Lake] attempt to smear Senator Burns “just happens” to use the identical context and verbiage to Tester’s media baloney blitz right down to the order of fabrications.
Mark Twain explained it this way, "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damn lies, and statistics." Anyone with an ounce of sense realizes that a few hand picked examples out of thousands of instances do not represent an honest sampling. Jon Tester’s thinly veiled attempt to rewrite history does more to illuminate Tester’s lack of substance than Senator Conrad Burns’s track record. Sometimes amendments add such baggage to a bill that its author ends up voting against it. The Democratic election machine evidently feels you’re stupid enough to swallow it whole without question.
Forget all the party line blather. I can testify to the following:
In 2002, I approached both Senator Burns and Max Baucus with news of a very unsettling matter involving over 10,000 U.S. Servicemen nationwide including at least ten that I know of in Montana. Senator Burns’s staff has worked tirelessly from the onset, making great strides for both myself and the other veterans involved. Baucus, calling himself “Montana’s Veterans’ Senator”, couldn’t be bothered. As far as I know, the information I hand delivered to his staff in Missoula is still sitting in the same drawer, gathering dust. Max’s chief of staff shook my hand in Kalispell, vowing to, “look into it and get back to me.” I haven’t heard from him since. It’s about real concern and firm action, not just getting elected.
So, when Jon Tester hitches his wagon to cheap lies and the less than stellar accomplishments of that grinning gasbag in a bolo tie, Brian Schweitzer, he’s going nowhere. If their overwrought bungling of the school funding issue is supposed to make me sit up and take notice…it may, but it sure won’t cause me to back either of them. Vote for the real deal, Conrad Burns.
[Please see: http://vva.org/shad/index.htm and ]http://www1.va.gov/SHAD]
J.B. Stone
Whitefish, MT
Pete, you wrote: "There are some rumors of discontent within the Democratic Party. There’s a potential plank being advanced by the environmental wing of the party that deals with coal development. While some Democrats advocate more development in the Eastern Montana coalfields, notably Governor Schweitzer’s coal-to-diesel proposal, others want to take a go-slow approach to mining."
No only doesn't the MDP have a coal development position, Jon Tester has NO stand or position on coal development. As reported, 71% of Montanans want coal development. For the MDP and Tester to not have coal development positions suggests a "knife in the back" to the hopes of a majority of Montanans. Governor Schweitzer seems to be aligned with those Montanans and deserves credit for taking a position that the people want eventhough the militant enviros in Tester's camp do not. It's too bad that Tester does not have the same courage to declare himself.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Centrist Party Represents Voters, Politicians in Center
New Political Party Announced its Formation on July 4th, 2006
The Centrist Party is registered with the Federal Election Commission.
[Note: We are developing a platform designed for a common sense approach. We will avoid using the same type of thinking that has brought America to the current political stalemate/polarization. In the mean time we will put together a news and discussion forum. You will receive a press release when it is up and running.]
A new political party has been formed to bring balance to the field of American politics by giving voters and politicians in the center, a strong foundation to express their views. The party was established to give the American political landscape a chance to break the stalemate between the left and right. Without a strong foundation in the center, any attempt at maturing the political environment would likely fall short, said the founder.
The party, to be known as the Centrist Party, was founded by John P. Reisman, who said, the party's motto is "Common Sense for America". America is already largely centrist; the idea just needs a home. The Centrist Party is by design, a solid foundation for centrist views. Without it, politicians can claim to be centrist and after they are elected, meander back to their special interest base, and the far left or right, where their funding comes from. Creating a centrist foundation significantly strengthens the integrity and ability of politicians to campaign on, and maintain a centrist political view."
"The nature of our two party system has brought America to a political impasse. While many Americans lean toward centrist views, there is no 'party' to represent these views. The Centrist Party provides a concrete foundation that allows people to develop a viable alternative to left/right politics," Reisman said.
"While we are getting started, the party will provide ideological support for centrist positions and candidates. As the party strengthens and we attain position on the state ballots, we can look at nominating candidates. We do not intend to nominate a candidate prior to viability. Support for the Centrist Party, viability and nominations will occur when the time is right in order th strengthen the political process and avoid weakening it. In the mean time we will work towards increasing understanding, and support Centrist candidates and ideals the country can benefit from. The striking difference for a Centrist candidate, is that one can stand for separate issues that originate from either side of the aisle. Centrists also tend to avoid extremes that are not considerate of short and long term thinking." It is the belief of Mr. Reisman that providing a centrist foundation may yield innovative answers that may not have been possible from the left or the right, due to the polarized character of their respective platforms. "With a centrist foundation the candidates won't be bound to the extremes and will be able to construct pragmatic solutions."
"Mainstream America is tired of watered down solutions and partisan politics. By empowering the middle with its own political party, we are giving the nation a chance to reduce partisan bickering. The Centrist Party is a natural step toward reducing the effects of special interests and one-sided agendas," Reisman said.
"In order for the political landscape in America to move forward and make a real difference, solutions must reach across the boundaries of partisan politics", he said. "We need answers that make sense for the nation. Our immediate goal is to provide support for centrist candidates and the ideology. Second is to work towards putting the Centrist Party on the ballot as soon as feasible. In the mean time we can support centrists on both sides of the aisle while efforts are directed at providing a viable third party choice for America where centrist candidates can stand firm without being pulled left and right."
The Centrist Party
Box 130689
Big Bear Lake, CA 92315
Web: http://www.uscentrist.org
E-mail:
Phone: 866-583-7142