“unfiltered” commentary
Public Ownership of Montana Streams Under Attack
By K Durham, New West Unfiltered 2-21-07
I am referring, of course, to opposition to Senate Bill 78, which requires landowners to comply with Montana law, as well as the introduction of House bills 424 and 642, which attempt to frustrate legal access to public waterways.
One thing that often is not understood about the terms “public land” and “public resource” in reference to land, game, and waters, is that “public” means “public” – not “government.” Montana’s streams belong to you, Montanans, not to your government. Whether you are a Republican or Democrat, those are your waters to enjoy. Private property rights are already protected under Montana law. What is under attack is public ownership of Montana’s streams and rivers.
When state legislators irresponsibly allow private landowners to seize, restrict, or limit access to Montana streams up to the high water mark (as defined in Montana’s 1985 Stream Access Law), they are allowing a few landowners not only to break existing law, but also to effectively steal your stream or river and make it their own, with no remuneration, restitution, or consequence for that theft of the public’s property. And you can be certain that, unless you are a mega-rich angler who can pay thousands of dollars for a vacation at an elite fly fishing resort, you will never again enjoy what once was yours to enjoy. Nor will your children.
Here in Colorado, one needs only to visit a depressed little community like Kremmling and explore its environs to see what private ownership of streams and once-public lands does to popular tourism. Want to fish one of the beautiful streams or rivers you see? Forget it, unless you are rich and can afford an “exclusive” fishing vacation. Want to access some of the hundreds of thousands of acres of National Forest land above the valley floor? Ha! The once-public access routes have been sold off to private ownership, and now you will be asked to pay a minimum of $250 to drive on what once was a USFS road in order to reach National Forest land. The local community is dying because the regular, working citizen has no way to enjoy once-public natural resources, and rich nonresidents don’t spend a dime where they might have to rub shoulders with local commoners.
If Montanans allow a few out-of-touch legislators to begin fencing them out of their own streams and rivers, or to slyly redefine stream access rights from “high water mark” to “surface waters” (read the proposed bills – they are already pulling that quick switch!), it won’t be long before Montana streams and rivers will be, like in so many parts of Colorado and California, “look but don’t touch – unless you’re rich.” The whole state will suffer for the benefit of a handful of rich and elite.
Republicans seem to believe that votes are a commodity to be bought with big money – money represented by a few wealthy landowners who want to brazenly steal Montana’s public resources. Rank-and-file Montanans, on the other hand, seem to understand that state legislators should represent the best interests of Montanans, and that those who do will earn votes one at a time. Montana’s Republican legislators should be reminded – by letter, phone call, and e-mail – that brazenly stealing from the public can turn a red state blue in a hurry. [End of article]
As a longtime fly fisher and outdoor nut, I must comment on the state of our nation. We are becoming a nation of those who have and those who don't. I moved to Colorado for an employment offer, after seeing all the mags with huge trout and pretty landscape pictures. In which I was really excited to be able to fish. There has never been a mention in those mags about Private Property Restrictions. After arriving in Colorado all I see are " No Trespassing" signs everywhere. Can't fish here can't fish there. A No Trespassing sign is really a "F#@% You" sign, I have it and you don't. Of course you can pay $350 onetime fee and $100 a year membership fee, then a daily rod fee of $40 -$110 for the Rocky Mountain Angling Club. If your rich enough to spend that to fish the so called elite property which they control. With gas prices the way they are and $40 - $110 a day fishing fees.They aquire more and more stream access every year. Land owners that use to let you fish for free are now charging to gain access. Every year access gets smaller and smaller. It is getting that a working man cannot afford to fish. Stream access is getting less and less. The so called dream streams areas that you can access has so much fishing pressure that it is not enjoyable at all to fish, shoulder to shoulder. It is a shame, we have recently left Colorado the land of the rich. And moved back to Tennessee, where I can access a stream and fish with hardly no pressure, no land owner hassling me. My suggestion is go to Michigan, Kentucky, Tennessee or one of the states that allow anglers access. You will get more bang for your dollar. But don't give those bastards your money, tourism is what Colorado and the western states live for. Laws are getting passed in favor of the big money and campaign contributions. These laws effect every common angler out there. I picture this country being like England someday where only the Rich and Elite get to hunt and fish. We as americans must do something to stop this. Voting is one way another is to get involved.
Comment By Phil Briggs, 2-13-08"When state legislators irresponsibly allow private landowners to seize, restrict, or limit access to Montana streams up to the high water mark (as defined in Montana’s 1985 Stream Access Law), they are allowing a few landowners not only to break existing law, but also to effectively steal your stream or river and make it their own, with no remuneration, restitution, or consequence for that theft of the public’s property."
Isn't this the rule (law) pretty much everywhere? Here in Texas, the rivers are all public property, up to the high water line. If you want to access one of the hottest fishing holes on the local river, for maybe it's entire stretch, you either join the local hunting club, for $325/year, or you boat 5 miles upstream. There is literally no room to drop a hook, during the spring fish migrations, on weekends. No one ever complains about not being able to drive the 1/2 mile from the main hwy. right up to the river.
In Montana, (and CO) with the high bank rule, can a person still float through on the rivers, and fish as they go downstream, as long as they don't get above the high water mark?
If I were lucky enough to own streamside property in Montana, I doubt if I'd like Joe Sixpack driving past my home to go fishing... However, if Joe were kayaking down, stepped out on shore and started fishing, I'd have no concerns or complaints.
Just be lucky you live in Montana, where you have access to millions of acres of public land. If you want to hunt here, you hunt your own land, or pay someone else for the privelege... there is only a tiny bit of public land here... you could probably squeeze every single acre available, into one small mountain valley in one of the national forests...