Coal Is Still King

Solar Future Suddenly Cloudy

By Richard Martin, 11-16-07

 

Coal up, solar down – that’s the message from the markets and the media this week, as solar-power companies face a possible expiration of the tax credits for solar investments, while coal producers and coal plants continue to boom despite the looming threat of carbon-emissions caps.

The Solar Energy Industries Association posted an alert on its Web site citing “widespread reports” that the long-awaited energy bill being laboriously squeezed through Congress will not include a measure to extend the Solar Investment Tax Credits, which give commercial solar-power system owners tax relief equal to 30% of total system costs. If the credits aren’t extended it could slow the adoption of solar generation by utilities, according analyst Stephen Chin at investment firm UBS.

The news hit the stocks of publicly traded solar power companies hard this week.

Meanwhile The Economist reports that for all the news about states in the U.S. delaying or canceling the construction of new coal-fired plants, coal is still king (Sub. req.) in much of the world. “Utilities in both [the U.S. and Western Europe] are running their coal-fired plants at full throttle, have several new ones under construction and would like to build even more,” the influential British newsweekly reports, while China is reputed to bring a new coal plant online every week. In the developed world, the lower price-per-watt of coal more than outweighs any possible future premium for carbon emissions.

“In America, more coal-fired generation is being built than at any time in the past seven years, despite the threat of emissions caps, according to the Department of Energy,” the story continues.

Meanwhile the Center for Global Development released a study showing that while American remains the largest emitter of climate-changing CO2, it is rapidly being overtaken by the rapidly growing economies of China and India. “A single Southern Co. plant in Juliette, Ga., emits more annually than Brazil’s entire power sector,” writes Juliet Eilperin of The Washington Post.

In other energy news:

-- Those three handsome fellows in the new nationwide TV ads that, starting next week, will plug the energy policy legislation? Those are Western governors Schwarzenegger (Calif.), Huntsman (Utah), and Schweitzer (Montana). Sponsored by Environmental Defense, the TV spots will highlight the unfortunate fact that, while governments at the state level have taken significant action to reduce carbon emissions, the federal government has been inactive. “Now it’s their turn,” Schwarzenegger tells The New York Times.

-- Once upon a time, “micro-hydro” – small-scale electricity generating projects using hydro power – was seen as a local, next-generation fix for America’s energy needs. Government regulation and the resistance of big utilities mostly killed that promise, but micro-hydro could be making a comeback in the Roaring Fork Valley. Bruce FaBrizio, the founder and CEO of Simple Green, which produces nontoxic, biodegradable cleaning products, is attempting to build a mini-hydroelectric plant on the Brush Creek on his property outside Aspen. “This is a dream I’ve had for 30 years,” FaBrizio tells the Aspen Times.

-- Just as tortuous as the progress of energy legislation through the U.S. Congress is the effort to re-distribute the millions of dollars in revenue from oil and gas production flowing into the Colorado treasury. Even given extra time, the interim committee in the state legislature charged with hashing out a compromise on how it spends burgeoning lease and tax revenues won’t meet its latest deadline. Municipal and local governments say that the lawmakers are going about it all wrong: the money should go first to benefit local communities affected by oil and gas drilling, Aron Diaz, executive director of the Associated Governments of Northwest Colorado, tells the Grand Junction Sentinel, before being spread around at the state level.

[End of article]
Comment By mw, 11-17-07

Recently, I listened to a Senate debate on C-Span about energy. The figures that caught my attention was that-- currently--solar & wind provides less that one percent of this nations energy needs. Hydro power, with more than two million dams in this country, may become less of an option if climatic change reduces water supplies. As the global warming clock ticks, nuclear power is the only realistic alternative to coal. The only way China & India may curtail their use of coal would be to increase their use of nuclear. And the politics of nuclear power will be very devisive, resulting in delays. It is difficult to be optimistic about timely energy solutions.

Comment By sweed7, 11-18-07

"Timely Energy Solutions" are beyond the scope of the mentality of the do gooders pushing the politics of corn gas, solar, wave power. wind and Geo Thermal. The potential of all of those options combined is somewhat like peeing in the ocean to cause a flood. If you count the energy used to produce those energy sources the result is probably negative. In the forseeable future the only sources to meet growing energy needs are oil, coal, and nuclear. If delayed development pushes homes back to burning coal and wood the enviros will really see polution.

Comment By Cindy Kessler, 11-21-07

Pardon me but I recall the short period of optimism and encouragement for alternative energy that was ended by that actor from California--Reagan was his name-- and all you mindless followers of right wing trickle down gobbledygook can proudly claim the right to proclaim your lock step behavior behind leaders who sold America to the highest bidder has brought us to this Global Crisis.

"Timely Energy Solutions" had better be found and followed fast or you guys will be able to add the title "Brainless Fools" to your resume or epitaph.

Comment By sweed7, 11-21-07

I hope Global Crisis doesn't mean man made political "Global Warming" If you want some truth go to media outside of the USA.
Look up global warming in: http://canadafreepress.com/

Comment By Cindy Kessler, 11-21-07

Global Crisis includes "Global Warming" and all the rest of the many messes you guys who follow pied pipers have allowed our country to fall into--I won't waste my time addressing--man made political--I read several foreign news papers every AM and brother--outside our borders people are really mad at how dumb Americans are--unfortunately--I get lumped in with the likes of you.

Comment By sweed7, 11-21-07

Some people are too emotional to digest facts. Run with the biggest scare.

Comment By stueysplace ca, 11-23-07

We don't have time to create nuclear plants. Anyone noticed the sun? That sucker gets damn hot! I live in a solar house.

Comment By sweed7, 11-23-07

Do you count the energy that it takes to build solar panels, Mine lead, make batterys, install the system, transport and later destroy old batteries. Solar is marginal at best!

Comment By stueysplace ca, 11-23-07

sweed7, You don't need batteries when solar is combined with a hill (any hill) and a parabolic dish. If you've ever held a half inch magnifying glass to your had while focused on the sun you will know how hot it gets. a 10 foot dish can create over 2000 deg F
The hill?
Ontario hydro has been storing electricity for years by pumping water up a hill and then running it down again when needed. We don' have the time to fool around with this thing.

Comment By sweed7, 11-24-07

Good approach, expensive but if done right sounds good. Thanks for education. Unfortunately we use so much energy that solar can't keep up. Every little bit helps!

This article was printed from www.newwest.net at the following URL: http://www.newwest.net/main/article/solar_future_suddenly_cloudy/