Capital Commentary
With Edwards Out, Will Tuesday be ObamaFest for Idaho Dems?
By Jill Kuraitis, 1-30-08
The news that John Edwards will drop out of the race for the Democratic presidential nomination leaves the Obama campaign the only visible presence in Idaho, and an impressive presence it is.
With the biggest and busiest campaign office I’ve ever seen in Boise, and more in Pocatello, Idaho Falls, Coeur d’Alene and Ketchum, the Obama acolytes are having no trouble attracting volunteers. In fact, “so many people turn up that we’re always caught up on our to-do lists,” state director Katie Ingebretson told New West.
Now, the Ada County and the state Democratic Party offices and the Obama campaign are swamped with more to-do lists. Sen. Barack Obama will visit Idaho on Saturday morning, just four days before the caucuses, which means staff and volunteers must get ready for the two biggest things that happen in a presidential year – a visit from a presidential candidate and the Super Tuesday caucuses – at the same time.
I hereby testify that the double-event-duty concept is intimidating. When I was staff for campaigns, organizing events often fell to me, partly because my degree is in directing and stage managing. The logistics of just one of those events is a task for a strong leader, experienced lieutenants, and dozens of volunteers. And it helps if they are passionate about what they’re doing.
The Obama campaign appears to have plenty. With an “organic” start from BSU political science student Reggie Holmquist with help from Dave Ficks, it began without contact from Obama’s central organization. Democrat Julie Fanselow was there. “The main thing I remember about that first meeting - which was last February at JB’s in Meridian - was that when I walked in the room, I didn’t know anyone there. I knew right away that Obama was going to bring people into politics who’d never before had an interest in actively taking part. That was a great sign, and that’s exactly what’s happened.” A packed house at the grand opening of the Boise office, with paid staff from the national campaign, was the next step in developing what is now an impressive machine.
With no Hillary campaign in Idaho, and Edwards gone, what will the Tuesday caucuses look like?
Let’s hear your thoughts.
[End of article]Your headline says it all: ObamaFest
The thing is, people who haven't taken an interest at all are engaged by this leader. They sense something great is happening here.
Dave, Reggie, and I were there from the start, but Team Obama has grown into an amazing and mighty force. Kassie, Tim, Jeran, TJ, Brett, Mike, Gary and Liz, Susie, Stacy, Tawny, and many many more got involved last summer and have been running the ball down the field. The goal is now in sight, and Idaho is poised to give Obama perhaps his biggest margin yet next Tuesday. We invite **all** Idahoans to be a part of it.
Comment By Sisyphus, 1-30-08With a rout predicted I worry the caucus may seem less imperative.
Comment By Sharon Fisher, 1-30-08Sisyphus, I feel the same. At this point I'm wondering what the point is of going.
Julie, you're right, the Idahoans for Obama team have done a great job, and I hope that the many new people his campaign brought in continue to work with other Idaho Democratic candidates.
Sharon, some time ago Julie made the assertiion that Obama's campaign is becoming the defacto statewide party. I wish with all my heart that such enthusiasm can change the status quo in Idaho. I hope the relationships being forged right now can spill over into worthy state and local elections. For this reason alone its worth getting on the bandwagon. He's a unifying force.
Comment By Sharon Fisher, 1-30-08Sisyphus, I remember four years ago when people said the exact same thing about the Howard Dean organization here, that it was becoming the "de facto statewide party."
Comment By Mama4Obama, 1-30-08It's important to make the point that the race will tighten up (who knows which direction Edwards' people will go?) in other SD-Tuesday states, and therefore Idaho's 18 (plus the 5 super Ds) could make a difference. Every body will be needed at the caucus to ensure we get our Obama Tsunama. (Okay, I took liberties with spelling.)
Comment By Sisyphus, 1-30-08Now you're just being a pessimist, Sharon. I made life long attachments as a result of Dean-mania. Most the websites I frequent were started by Deaniacs. Many of them are in Obama's camp. Dean flamed out for reasons that are still a mystery to me. But he heads the DNC and his fifty state strategy was key to taking back Congress. The message is grassroots and that is precisely where the party needs help the most. Obama is signing up hundreds of volunteers right now in red Idaho. When's the last time that happened here.
Don't get me wrong I think the de facto party label is a little presumptuous. But we need to ride the wave when it comes instead of waiting to see if the next one will be better. I'm not getting any younger. And things are getting bad.
I'll be there mama.
Oh, as did I (including you *smooch*). It's just funny to hear the exact same thing said now, and I hope that they stay around, and that the county and state party organizations do a good job of leveraging these energetic new resources.
Comment By Idagreen, 1-30-08It is unfortunate that Edwards and others have dropped out before the caucus, both for their supporters and for the action at the caucus. Remember though, that there can also be a caucus of the undecided participants, which would be awarded delegates if reaching threshold. This group would receive delegates based on proportions as would the candidates.
In 2004 there were a large number of these folks in my district, which would have likely made 15% if they had maintained their numbers on the first count. Of course, this group is a harder to organize as their issues and priorities are not as clear as with a particular candidate. Still, the potential exists for people that are not committed to the remaining candidates to participate without joining a particular candidate's caucus. The delegates, if earned, would then go to the convention to work on the platform and vote on national delegates.
I think we sometimes lose sight of the other work that needs to be done at the convention aside from the national delegate count. The process is important as well as the outcome. And I think Sysiphus hit on something critical for organizations, that the relationships and structures established by any popular campaign can persist and grow beyond that particular event.
I encourage everyone that interested to participate, "Obama Tsunama" or no. It's a great participatory experience, and you might even have fun!
Idagreen--great point...about the important work that gets done at the convention. And the rocking good time of being among opinionated Ds...and yes...there will be independents and even some Rs there Tuesday...it will be fascinating.
Dean has been very good to Idaho, indeed. I would also submit to you that the 50 state strategy goes away if Hil is the nominee and then wins the presidency.
We have a lot of heavy lifting to do this year. Let's be sure to play nice with each other and find ways to work together, because we will have to put together coalitions of grassroots groups in order to win. See y'all Tuesday...I'll the one of the THOUSANDS with an Obama button!
Well, that's the thing. I was hoping to be an Edwards delegate to the convention. There's going to be a *lot* of Obama people eager to be delegates, and it'll be in Boise, so I suspect it's unlikely I'll be able to go. On the other hand, I had the opportunity already, so I should probably let other people have the chance anyway.
Mama, I've also heard that, that as well as this being Hilary vs. Obama, it's DNC (Dean) vs. DLC (Clinton).
Sharon, I know there are a good number of folks that share your skeptical view of the caucus from the perspective of a voter without a candidate. If all of those people still showed up to the caucus, and remained uncommitted, I wouldn't be surprised if the group was large enough to receive delegates. The challenge is keeping everyone in the uncommitted camp through the second ballot. I still think this would be a way to broaden the representation at the convention.
I'm not so sure that there will be as much competition for delegate spots among the Obama caucus as you might expect. A lot of people are on board with this campaign for the presidential race and may not be all fired up for less glamorous party work. There has usually been a need for alternates to attend, if not for delegates in the first place. This year is definitely unusual though.
It's considerate of you to think of those who may not have attended already, but we want qualified delegates that are ready to work in any case. I'm sure you'd fit the bill there. I'd encourage you to campaign for a delegate position if you're able and willing to go, whether there are others that are interested or not. I think you would have a lot to contribute.
Well, thanks. That's nice to hear.
Comment By Papa4Obama, 2-03-08I'm a registered Republican but consider myself independent as i think the GOP has gone off the tracks (McCain provides some hope). I will enthusiastically attend my first caucus on Tuesday in strong support of Obama. I think it's unhealthy our state has such a huge political disparity and the Idaho Democratic party are going to be further marginalized if Billary win. The Dems have an infinitely easier time winning in November with Obama. My many Republican friends basically say that if Obama wins the Dem nomination, they'll fold their tent and wait 4 more years. If Billary wins, it's like rocket fuel for them to be re-energized. I just can't believe that Billary supporters don't see this. Would they rather have 4-8 more years of GOP dominance or not? It's that simple. Further, it's also a assured that we'll have had 20-24 years of bitter partisanship if another Bush/Clinton are in the White House.
This article was printed from www.newwest.net at the following URL: http://www.newwest.net/city/article/with_edwards_out_will_tuesday_be_obamafest_for_idaho_dems/C108/L108/