By Bill Schneider, 3-25-08
| What is it? Montana Gold -- 1,500 gallons of microbew almost cooked. Photo by Bill Schneider. | |
| "Miller and Budweiser still think this is a fad, but they're wrong." --Sam Hoffmann, president, Montana State Brewers Assn. | |
| Judging Montana microbrew at last year's Montana Beer Festival. Photo by Sam Porter. | |
Bill, do you remember Great Falls Select?
Comment By Bill Schneider, 3-25-08Yep, I remember the taste. That company is long gone, though, but guess what, Craig. Harvest Moon Brewing in Belt is now making a beer called Great Falls Select.....Bill
Comment By Craig Moore, 3-25-08Don't that beat all that some yuppie outfit would try to brew Great Falls Select without the purity of Missouri River mud.
There was a time that "Montana" beer included Great Falls Select, Hamm's (because of the bear), Olympia (because of the horseshoe on the label), and Pabst Blue Ribbon in Butte (because it was union made).
Oops! One more....Luck Lager (because some people just felt lucky).
Comment By Craig Moore, 3-25-08Darn stumble fingers. Should be Lucky Lager.
Comment By Helena, 3-25-08Good article idea, Bill, but you are setting your sights too low. In 2006 I decided to visit as many as I could of Montana's breweries AND as many hot springs as I could. I didn't make it to all, but I made it to many.
Of course, I didn't have to write an article about each and I applaud you for doing so. I would also be happy to pick up and deliver a fresh growler from the Miles City Brewing Company when I pass though in April to save you driving that far to taste beer that is worse than warm Oly in the can.
Entries are blogged at http://dougswonderblog.blogspot.com/ but you'll have to search by "brewery" or "hot spring"
Have fun at the Raven,
Doug
Hi Bill,
Thanks for choosing to write about the Montana brewing scene!! It is a very exciting time to be a brewer in our great state.
However, there are some inaccuracy's in your article.
First, while the craft beer revolution has contributed to the woes of large brewers the bulk of their market erosion has come from imported beer and distilled spirits. The latest generation of legal age drinkers have been trending towards mixed beverages and Imported beer such as Heineken or Corona.
Second it was stated there were only three or four struggling Montana breweries in 1999 when there was actually 17 or 18 . We were fortunate enough to experience triple digit growth that year.
The third discrepancy is with regards to the alcohol limit which is 8.75% ABV not 8%. The bulk of craft beers produced are between 4 and 5.5% alcohol by volume. Budweiser is 5% alcohol by volume or 4% alcohol by weight. Both of which are legal units of measure but leave a different impression with the consumer. It is when you start looking at specialty craft beer such as a barley wine or imperial stout that you find a distinctly higher alcohol content than domestic beer. These beers tend to be much much more robust than typical craft beers, hence consumed in much smaller quantities.
And finally I do not regard the MTA as a 900 pound gorilla, they are a group of small businesses that are acting in what they perceive as their best interest. The issue goes way beyond breweries, two full service liquor licenses in Missoula recently sold for a million dollars. Any dilution of the percieved value of license also negatively impacts the note holder. Thus financial institutions have just as much to lose as the license holder. We are talking to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars! Any changes to our current draconian laws need to take into consideration the impact they will have on the bars and taverns.
I am looking forward to reading your future articles!
Bjorn Nabozney
Bjorn, how do you guys make a moose drool and make it taste so good?
Comment By Dan Leithauser, 3-27-08Bjorn, I appreciated this perspective, "The issue goes way beyond breweries, two full service liquor licenses in Missoula recently sold for a million dollars. Any dilution of the percieved value of license also negatively impacts the note holder. Thus financial institutions have just as much to lose as the license holder. We are talking to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars! Any changes to our current draconian laws need to take into consideration the impact they will have on the bars and taverns."
At the same time, I have to wonder if, at some point, for the sake of building new business opportunities, and enhancing the overall economy, that this paper tiger needs a major adjustment.
The value of these licenses benefits Montana in what way? Correct me if I am wrong... MT gets the single license fee at the time of the lottery. Then these government issued licenses are sold on the open market? State regulation turns into free market? How and WHY does a private party benefit from a original state revenue and regulatory instrument? Does this seem right? I am not insensitive to your position or the position of current note holders -- only asking the question.
MT is definitely in the minority of states using this antiquated approach to alcohol licensing, and should approach the economic growth potential with a more progressive stance. There are plenty of examples, including Oregon, Washington, and Colorado--three western high volume brewer states. Some adjustment is necessary in my opinion.
Craig,
Tackling the moose is the hardest part, but once you have it down they are pretty agitated and tired as a result you get a prolific amount of drool. Over the years we have a compiled team of the most skilled moose tacklers in the world as a result the drool is truly world class.
Dan,
Montana's current licensing system has established market values that are by my estimation nuts. I certainly don't have any solutions to offer, but I do agree that some type of adjustment is in order.