Diary Of A Mad Voter: Jessica Peck Corry

Catering, Fundraising and Other Woes Plague Democrats’ Convention

By Jessica Peck Corry, 7-11-08

 

As national Democrats prepare for their party’s convention in Denver next month, they find themselves questioning a longtime ally for liberal causes: The New York Times. The controversy arose after a Times report Sunday highlighted concerns with Democratic National Convention planning.

The Times referenced a 28-page contract that asked caterers to provide food in

"at least three of the following five colors: red, green, yellow, blue/purple and white." Garnishes could not be counted toward the colors.  No fried foods would be allowed.  Organic and locally grown foods were mandated, and each plate had to be 50 percent fruits and vegetables. As a result, caterers are shying away.

The Denver 2008 Host Committee struck back, saying the above requirements were actually only voluntary suggestions. 

"No food service establishment or business is being told what to serve," said Parry Burnap, the committee’s greening director, in a press release. "We are merely creating a voluntary option to demonstrate the connections between good nutrition and a healthy environment, to highlight the healthy and environmentally responsible character of our city, and provide voluntary choices that respond to consumer preferences for healthy, local or organic food while promoting Colorado growers."

But, according to one caterer I talked with - a woman who regularly caters for local political events - she gave up on submitting a vendor proposal after learning that the "green" goals of convention organizers would amount to dozens of pages of paperwork that would have also mandated new expenses for her growing business.

With red tape like this, it’s no wonder the convention planning committee has been forced to dump several convention-related parties.  Of course, outrageous cuisine requirements defined by their eagerness to protect the common good were just part of the problem.  Competition and cost efficiencies are not a priority for a political party determined to please everyone from environmentalists to the big business lobby.

Officials, including Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean, also disputed the Times allegation that convention planners are now $6 million in the hole, calling the charges against Democrats "uninformed criticism."

But was it?

Mike Dino, CEO of the convention’s host committee, told the Rocky Mountain News that

it could be related to earlier published reports where he believed they would need between $5 [million] and $10 million more than what the contract between the host committee and the DNCC dictated.

But then there are facts that the party’s leaders cannot ignore, spin, or deny. While small businesses are being forced to jump through endless hoops to meet "voluntary" goals, when it comes to office accommodations for the DNCC, no expense was spared.

When the DNCC opened its Denver headquarters months ago, organizers opted for expensive downtown real estate at a cost of $100,000 a month, the Times reported. And this doesn’t include the $50,000 a month to rent furniture, another cost cited by the Times. For a couple hundred grand, the committee certainly could have bought some pretty nice office furniture that it could have donated to non-profits once the convention wraps.

Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper - ever the philanthropic darling - and his friends in power once sold Denver taxpayers on the concept of hosting the convention here, saying the four-day event could drive $160 million into the local economy.

Yet, convention fundraising was more than $11 million short of a its $40.6 million goal in mid-June.

Even with lethargic fundraising, Democrats are now focused on the 75,000 seat Invesco Field as the spot where presumed nominee Barack Obama will give his acceptance speech on Aug. 28.  The move could cost organizers $3 million.

While a few million now may not sound like a lot, the tab appears to be ballooning by the minute.

Editor’s note: Jessica Peck Corry’s weekly blogs are part of NewWest.Net/Politics’ “Diary of a Mad Voter” feature, a group blog, published in partnership with the Denver Post’s Politics West intended give a glimpse into the hearts and minds of several independent-minded voters and thinkers in the Rocky Mountain West in the ‘08 election cycle. For more columns check in with www.newwest.net/madvoter. And for more information on each of the bloggers, click here.

[End of article]
Comment By jwscotch, 7-11-08

This will end in a huge net loss for the community...I only hope the effected businesses ask for cash upfront. The $3 million move to Invesco has been greatly understated. Securiety for the convention for the Pepsi Center has been aided by a $50 million federal "grant"...now cities throughtout the state have been asked to furnish extra police officers (50+ from Colo Spgs) at twice the pay being given to local cops. I can only imagine the increase in Secret Service (taxpayer cost) to secure the open air facility. TV networks, using union labor, are saying the cost of moving their cables from one location to the other to be prohibitive to cover the event. Finally, during the Q & A on moving to the stadium, a DNC spokesman said they had "two weeks" to get Invesco in shape for the next event...wrong, try two days! Moved from 8/30 to the night of 8/31, the annual CSU/CU football game (78,000)...slipped under the radar. To attempt to get the field in any playable (safe) condition can't be done without great expense to (?) Canceling the game is a direct loss in needed revenue to both schools, the city loses the revenue from the event as do the local businesses who depend on these events. Therefore, in the spirit of "fairness," the DNC should be required to file an Economic Impact Study for approval prior to even thinking about moving the event. "Not enough time," say some. "Tough," say I.

Comment By Inky, 7-11-08

Since Jessica is "fair and balanced," I'm wondering if New West will strive for a report about the GOP convention in Minneapolis, and what challenges emerge there?
MinnPost might be a good resource -- they're a mini-ProPublica alternative paper. I'm sure if there's anything juicy emerging there, they'll find it.
Meanwhile, this latest report from Jessica just isn't up to her usual standards for hard-hitting reportage.
Indeed, one might ask "where's the beef?"

Comment By flounder, 7-11-08

All you need o know about the Republican convention is that Republican policies of not wanting to pay for stuff killed people there when a bridge collapsed. Oh and that is where Larry Craig had his fun.

Comment By DLA, 7-14-08

The dems are so out of touch, and these facts about the dems prove it.

They are so UN American, costing local companies and businesses for their foolish ideology. They want to tell people at the convention what to eat! pretty soon they will want to run every single breath that American's take!

They are so insulting to even out of town business! No Pineapple is to be served since it has a high carbon footprint! (because of all the jet fuel used to ship it here from Hawaii) Carbon footprint nonsense! (when did they forget the basic science fact that plants and all their 'green' stuff needs CO2 to live, and thrives on it! willful blindness describes them and the leftist enviromentalists)

Do they think American's are that stupid?

Comment By G. Jones, 7-15-08

MMMM. Blue food. I love blue food...

This article was printed from www.newwest.net at the following URL: http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/catering_fundraising_and_other_woes_plague_democrats_convention/C530/L37/