Guest Column
In the Prism of the Farm Bill, Obama Looks Right
By Robert Struckman, 9-04-08
U.S. agriculture provides the safest and most abundant food supplies at the lowest prices in the world. As consumers, we are all affected by the farm bills passed by the U.S. Congress every three to five years and signed by the president. They set the policies for production, health, safety, and distribution—including exports—of the nation’s food supplies.
Farm bills do not just happen. Each takes months of study, discussion, debate and compromise. For the complicated, tiring passage of a farm bill, there are grandstanders like Sen. John McCain and farm policy advocates like Sen. Barack Obama.
Farmers in Montana and other states have a huge stake in the bill’s provisions. In addition to agriculture provisions, farm bills govern food stamps, commodity food banks, senior citizen centers, school breakfasts and lunches and other programs including Women, Infants and Children and Food for Peace, animal welfare protections are upgraded and improved in farm bills, as well as research of plants, animals and fish.
Everyone everywhere in the United States has interests and concerns in the policies set by a farm bill. Months ago I called Obama’s Senate office to talk to the staffer handling the legislation for the senator. A veteran staffer, who had worked for Illinois senators and representatives for more than a decade, told me of the strong and dedicated advocacy of Obama on the bill.
I helped to pass several farm bills during my eight years in the U.S. House of Representatives and 12 years in the Senate. There was then and still now are a few senators who stay out of the necessary task of getting a farm bill passed. They wash their hands of the struggle. McCain is one of these: It “costs too much,” “does more harm than good,” “three million to research the DNA of grizzly bears,” and so on. Cheap shots!
McCain’s criticism and opposition works for a very few, but passage of a farm bill is a necessity, not a luxury or an option. When you consider the interests of farmers in dairy, corn, wheat, barley, cotton, rice, sugar, oranges and peanuts, that is a lot of players in a bill that has to have a majority. Then add the interests of schools, community food programs, animal welfare and Food for Peace. Patience and understanding are essential in putting together the votes for passage.
Every president working on a new farm bill has to be comprehensive, knowledgeable and flexible. On this point, McCain is not ready to lead. One-liner quotes do not cut it.
Obama does pass muster as a ready, willing and knowledgeable advocate for both farmers and consumers. Also to his credit, Obama relates with compassion and common sense to using America’s abundant food supplies for the needy here at home and for the hungry abroad.
* Montana Democrat John Melcher served four terms in the U.S. House and two terms in the Senate.
This is a guest opinion. NewWest.Net welcomes guest columns of all stripes. If this sounds like your bag, contact .
There is a bunch of garbage in thses bills, but you are right Sen. Melcher, it is sausage making and that is what you get in a representational democracy.
I see Senator Westmoreland called Obama "uppity" today. I wish Craig was still around to tell us how this term is not racially tinged and no Republicans are racist. I miss him already. Maybe Rose Mary can defend this, although I am afraid she is in jail for threatening Obama with a sawed off shotgun.
The farm bill always amazes me. To wit the bill pays a large majority of its funds to conservation. Yes, paying not to farm. If you look into the recipients of the conservation programs the prestigious wildlife organization is one of the largest participants.
Another thing that puzzles me is that Senator Baucus earmarked 520 Million dollars for the purchase of 320,000 acres of Plum Cr Lumber property in western Montana. The State of Montana is a partial payer of this as well. The Nature Conservancy will manage the purchase.
The Farm Bill has just as many crooked hands in it as any other bill.
Many of our leaders, such as Obama, are trying to limit the accessibility of short term, high demand financial assistance. Some areas are attempting to put legislation in place that would limit where these legitimate businesses can operate. Some states, such as Georgia and North Carolina, have out-and-out banned the industry altogether, and others are close behind. Across the nation, citizens are trying to have their voices heard by fighting legislative bans on the payday loan industry. The odd turn of events is that Obama and others are trying to eliminate an entire industry, losing thousands of jobs in the process and thousands more in potential jobs, during a time when unemployment and financial hardship is at the highest in recent memory, all in the name of political gain.
Post Courtesy of Personal Money Store
Professional Blogging Team
Feed Back: 1-866-641-3406
Home: http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.html
Blog: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/
Hilarious, the usurers from the payday loan industry have spammers. After we go after the Wall Street financiers with the pitchforks, why let them go to waste? Let's use them on the payday usurers.
This article was printed from www.newwest.net at the following URL: http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/in_the_prism_of_the_farm_bill_obama_looks_right1/C37/L37/