By Robert Struckman, 11-04-08
| Caption: Democrats get ready for victory at a get-out-the-vote. | |
Just after mid-night Tuesday night, it seemed Democrats had swept all but one of Montana’s statewide offices in what seems like a stunning referendum of the state’s modern Republican Party, leaving some GOP leaders wondering how to return to politics with something like an appealing message. Yet even as state Democrats credited the Obama effect for much of their strength, the Democratic Presidential-elect appeared likely to lose the state to John McCain.
Gov. Brian Schweitzer handily beat opponent Roy Brown of Billings, and Democrats dominated the rest of the ticket.
Steve Bullock was well ahead of Tim Fox for Attorney General, Monica Lindeen was beating Duane Grimes for State Auditor, Denise Juneau easily prevailed over Elaine Sollie Herman for Superintendent of Public Instruction, and Mike McGrath topped Ron Waterman for Chief Justice of the Montana Supreme Court. (All with more than 70 percent of precincts reporting.) Linda McCullough was running ahead of Brad Johnson for Secretary of State but the race remained close.
Oh, and Max Baucus beat Bob Kelleher to return to the U.S. Senate.
At a few minutes after 10 p.m., the Republican victory party at the Holiday Inn Grand in Billings had begun to thin. U.S. Rep Denny Rehberg—the Big Sky’s lone statewide winner—had given his victory speech, and gubernatorial candidate Roy Brown had given his concession.
“It’s been a real tough year for Republicans,” Brown said, speaking by telephone. “It’s one of those things where people in the country, and in Montana, want to try some chance, whether that change is good or bad. They didn’t care, because what we were doing wasn’t working.”
Caleb Weaver, spokesman for the Obama campaign in Montana, said Obama’s view from the beginning helped build the Democratic victories in Montana.
“You get on the ground and you talk to people,” Weavers said. “That’s what we did here. We had volunteers who took the time to talk to friends and neighbors. It was the hard work of those volunteers.”
One of those dedicated volunteers was Vermay Taylor, a Sioux member of the Fort Peck Tribe and retired licensed practical nurse, who made calls and knocked on doors in Wolf Point and Poplar, small towns on Montana’s high northeastern plains.
“We just all worked hard. We volunteered. We made calls, knocked on doors. We walked miles, covered every town on the rez,” Taylor said. “I’m almost in tears, I’m so happy.”
[End of article]The Land Board in Montana now has 5 dems and zero republicans. It will certainly be interesting to watch over the next few years to see if the Dems continue cowering to the resource extraction paradigm that has controlled Land Board thinking for years. Or if Dems will use their 5-0 margin to truly push a clean and green economy in Montana. They all seemed to talk plenty about it during the election, now let's see if they actually deliver on their promises via more sensible and sustainable Land Board decisions.
Comment By Jim Greaves, 11-05-08Matthew makes good points, but like all those who promote and want to enforce BY force land use restrictions, he forgets one thing: "all" Montanans do not pay property taxes, even though it may be passed through to renters, they never see it as a "tax". Only land-owners actually pay the tax, and are subject to the fines for not doing so. If the paradigm is to shift towards more protection of land, air and water, and a "greener" environmental atmosphere, perhaps all those who use the lands, drive cars, and recreate here, including out-of-state college students, would be willing to pony up some of the largesse that is expended from the PUBLIC coffers to support limitations on "property rights". Just my two cents, out there before Obama and Schweitzer take it. BTW, the rebate Schweitzer "gave back" to property owners [as if giving back something that was "taken" from us is a "gift"] -- was that from a real "surplus" or merely a bribe offered for his re-election [whatever, it seemed to work], and will we eventually see it re-extorted from us, incrementally replacing it into the state coffers over time, thus negating its real use to property owners?
Comment By JoMarch, 11-05-08The land board will most certainly be interesting to watch. I just hope these state officials will be able to remember that the decisions they make are for Montanan's and not for their own party platforms. These officials need to remember just how important the traditional uses of our state lands are to our state and its people.
This article was printed from www.newwest.net at the following URL: http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/montana_voters_bring_on_the_democrats/C37/L37/