Partisan Politics

Mormon Democrats: An Oxymoron or Future Voting Bloc?

By Lucy Burningham, 7-13-05

How will the Democrats ever manage to lure a sizable amount of Western voters into its fold? The puzzling question was being posed by higher ups in the party long before the 2004 presidential election. But as Democrats take a deep breath, reevaluate and try to gain power on local and national levels, the Western vote looks more tantalizing than ever before. And for the first time, many Democrats are publicly discussing pursuing the LDS, or Mormon, vote as a way to win the West.

An article in The Economist printed just before the 2002 Olympic Games, says that within the next 40 years, one in 20 Americans will be a Mormon. While the number doesn’t reflect a geographical concentration, there’s a good chance that many of the faithful will live in the West, with Salt Lake City as the church's headquarters.

While the 2004 Bush reelection machine organized and mobilized voters on the ground using evangelical churches across the country, Democrats chose not to incorporate religion into their campaigning. Now, many Democrats are speaking out against the strategy by recommending the acknowlegement of faith, such as Utah’s new Democratic Chairman Wayne Holland. In his acceptance speech this past May, Holland is quoted as saying:

“Understanding the LDS and making a serious appeal to them based on their values will help a lot, too. Think: independence, honesty, responsibility, education and a sense of community and fair play. If Romney gets the GOP nomination, there is no way Utah votes Democratic. But what if the religious right savages Romney and Harry Reid or someone like him (think: Jim Matheson or Tom Udall) was on the Democratic ticket? This would open up a lot of possibilities.�

Holland refers to the individuals who make up the growing number of prominent Mormon politicians. This past January, Sen. Democratic Leader Harry Reid, the highest-ranking LDS member of Congress, announced the first ever Mormon Congressional Caucus, which includes Congressman Tom Udall (D-NM), Jim Matheson (D-UT) and Eni Faleomavega from America Samoa.

In a press release at the time, Reid explained the reasoning behind the caucus, which has been meeting informally since its formation. “I believe strongly that Democrats have many of the same issues at heart as do members of the Church. For example, as a party, we believe it is our moral responsibility to care for the less fortunate and for one another.�

But Mormon Democrats remain a cultural oxymoron in Utah and in other Western states. Despite the church’s refusal to endorse political candidates, members of the LDS faith overwhelmingly vote Republican, an alliance that may be largely influenced by moral issues. (In 2004, Utah was the “reddest� state in the nation, with nearly 72 percent of voters casting ballots for Bush.) Wayne Holland explains which issues help sway the vote.

“Thinking out of the box can help win elections. A leftist Utah is a fantasy, but a moderate Utah is doable. To the extent that the Democratic Party defines itself as or let’s itself be defined as the party of abortion and gay marriage, it will be futile to try to carry Utah and the Mormon vote. Once you get beyond those issues, then the prospects for carrying Utah and the LDS in general are much better.�

Ben McAdams, a corporate security lawyer who lives in New York City, proudly identifies himself as both a Mormon and a Democrat. He points out that the Democratic party ruled Utah in the late 1800s, so Mormon leaders began a campaign to encourage Utah’s faithful to vote Republican. “They saw a need for a two party system,� McAdams says. “I’ve seen the church taking similar steps today.� He explains how a high-level church leader made sure a photo of him standing with Sen. Reid was widely published to demonstrate that “you can be a good Mormon and a Democrat.�

McAdams says that in order to recruit Mormon voters, the Democratic Party needs to convince voters that individual candidates do not represent the standard black and white platform issues. “One of the challenges is to convince people that you can vote based on a candidate, and core set of issues,� he says. “Just because you vote for a Democrat, doesn’t mean you have to support everything every Democrat ever said.�

You can bet that when DNC chair Howard Dean visits Salt Lake City this weekend, he’ll suggest better articulating the black, white and gray Democratic stances for all the residents of the West. And if the Democratic Party gets its wish, many Republican-voting Mormons will be listening.
[End of article]
Comment By Jonathan Weber, 7-14-05

Hm, very interesting Lucy. Seems like tough sledding for the Dems on this given the very conservative stance on social issues that most Mormons take. But then again, they were once fire-breathing radicals...

Comment By Cathie, 7-14-05

I've known lots of Mormon people. WHile they are socially conservative, they don't really seem to like people bothering themselves with other people's private business. Remember, also, that they were once a 'persecuted' religion - so they might not take too kindly to the rising tide of the christian right.

I can't think that, in general, they agreed with the what went on with the Terry Shaivo events...

Definately tough sledding, but if they go at it the right way, and considering the statistics, it'll be well worth it...

Comment By Norm, 7-15-05

"Were once a 'persecuted' religion" should read "continue to be a persecuted religion". No states have legalized murder of Mormons or denied them the vote in the last 50 years. However, Mormons continue to face intense will-will and discrimination.

I'll be interested to hear what Dean says. He's facing a uphill climb. However, don't underestimate the number of liberals in Utah (many out-of-state students that aren't represented in state election totals). We should focus our attention on 'converting' Mormons to the DNC outside the red hot center of the Mormon Mountain West. LA, Vegas, Phoenix, Seattle, Denver, and Albuquerque... that's where the Mormon strategy is a winner for Democrats. Not Provo, Logan, Salt Lake.

Comment By Mark, 7-15-05

Idaho went down this path under the guidance of then Governor Cecil Andrus in the 90's with the election of Larry Echohawk as AG and Richard Stallings as Congressman from the 2nd District. Attempts to take the strategy to higher office failed, whether for demographic or other reasons is still unclear. One major possibility is the tendency towards social conservatism on the part of the Mormon D's and the subsequent failure to energize the traditional Democratic activist base.

Comment By Wacky Hermit, 7-15-05

I'd be willing to bet Howard Dean *won't* try to re-frame the Democratic party as a party where lots of different views are allowed. If the Democrats today are a big-tent party, they're obviously not a big enough tent to include me. When they shrunk their tent with an emphasis on pro-abortion litmus tests, knee-jerk antithesis to national defense, and by sticking up for idiocy just because it had a "D" next to it, I ran for shelter to the Republicans.

Today's national Democratic party is a very, very small tent; they just think it's a big tent because it's now pitched so far away from the center that everybody else's tent looks small in the distance.

Comment By Benyamin Abrams, 7-17-05

Many people look at Mormons in the same way that they look at blacks. If you are a Mormon, you automatically believe in a set of beliefs and act in a particular way.

I am a moderate to conservative Republican. I am aghast at Bush's enviromental policies.

I support the Iraqi war for two reasons. Citizen's in Arab countries should have the chance to choose their own destinies. Since we have committed ourselves, I don't want the Iraqi Veterans to became like some of us Vietnam Veterans. The war was lost. Many people especially Democrats didn't support us. I have spent many years seeing myself as a loser because of the way some Liberals and Democrats treated me.

Some Mormons support and belong to unions. While others condemn the unions as tools of the devil.

Just because we follow the Prophet doesn't mean that we are unthinking robots.

Benyamin

Comment By Porter, 7-17-05

This article illustrates the desperate need for 3rd (4th, 5th, 6th) parties. I believe a great many mormons (like myself) would love to support socially beneficial and progressive ideas on the Democratic platform: universal health care (can anyone say "good Samaritan?), better stewardship for the earth, and a less militant U.S. forgien policy. All three of these directly reflect core Mormon beliefs. However, the Democrat's social agenda (gay marriage and abortion, et al) is unsupportable for many Mormons. Lets face it America, 2 parties just can't cover the diversity of beliefs in our country, and you only need to look at communities like those of the Mormon faith to prove it.

Comment By melissa marriner, 9-14-06

can u please send me information about the mormon faith in samoa as that is what my assignment is based on.

thank you very much.

This article was printed from www.newwest.net at the following URL: http://www.newwest.net/main/article/mormon_democrats_an_oxymoron_or_future_voting_bloc/