By Lucy Burningham, 7-13-05
How will the Democrats ever manage to lure a sizable amount of Western voters into its fold? The puzzling question was being posed by higher ups in the party long before the 2004 presidential election. But as Democrats take a deep breath, reevaluate and try to gain power on local and national levels, the Western vote looks more tantalizing than ever before. And for the first time, many Democrats are publicly discussing pursuing the LDS, or Mormon, vote as a way to win the West.Hm, very interesting Lucy. Seems like tough sledding for the Dems on this given the very conservative stance on social issues that most Mormons take. But then again, they were once fire-breathing radicals...
Comment By Cathie, 7-14-05I've known lots of Mormon people. WHile they are socially conservative, they don't really seem to like people bothering themselves with other people's private business. Remember, also, that they were once a 'persecuted' religion - so they might not take too kindly to the rising tide of the christian right.
I can't think that, in general, they agreed with the what went on with the Terry Shaivo events...
Definately tough sledding, but if they go at it the right way, and considering the statistics, it'll be well worth it...
"Were once a 'persecuted' religion" should read "continue to be a persecuted religion". No states have legalized murder of Mormons or denied them the vote in the last 50 years. However, Mormons continue to face intense will-will and discrimination.
I'll be interested to hear what Dean says. He's facing a uphill climb. However, don't underestimate the number of liberals in Utah (many out-of-state students that aren't represented in state election totals). We should focus our attention on 'converting' Mormons to the DNC outside the red hot center of the Mormon Mountain West. LA, Vegas, Phoenix, Seattle, Denver, and Albuquerque... that's where the Mormon strategy is a winner for Democrats. Not Provo, Logan, Salt Lake.
Idaho went down this path under the guidance of then Governor Cecil Andrus in the 90's with the election of Larry Echohawk as AG and Richard Stallings as Congressman from the 2nd District. Attempts to take the strategy to higher office failed, whether for demographic or other reasons is still unclear. One major possibility is the tendency towards social conservatism on the part of the Mormon D's and the subsequent failure to energize the traditional Democratic activist base.
Comment By Wacky Hermit, 7-15-05I'd be willing to bet Howard Dean *won't* try to re-frame the Democratic party as a party where lots of different views are allowed. If the Democrats today are a big-tent party, they're obviously not a big enough tent to include me. When they shrunk their tent with an emphasis on pro-abortion litmus tests, knee-jerk antithesis to national defense, and by sticking up for idiocy just because it had a "D" next to it, I ran for shelter to the Republicans.
Today's national Democratic party is a very, very small tent; they just think it's a big tent because it's now pitched so far away from the center that everybody else's tent looks small in the distance.
Many people look at Mormons in the same way that they look at blacks. If you are a Mormon, you automatically believe in a set of beliefs and act in a particular way.
I am a moderate to conservative Republican. I am aghast at Bush's enviromental policies.
I support the Iraqi war for two reasons. Citizen's in Arab countries should have the chance to choose their own destinies. Since we have committed ourselves, I don't want the Iraqi Veterans to became like some of us Vietnam Veterans. The war was lost. Many people especially Democrats didn't support us. I have spent many years seeing myself as a loser because of the way some Liberals and Democrats treated me.
Some Mormons support and belong to unions. While others condemn the unions as tools of the devil.
Just because we follow the Prophet doesn't mean that we are unthinking robots.
Benyamin
This article illustrates the desperate need for 3rd (4th, 5th, 6th) parties. I believe a great many mormons (like myself) would love to support socially beneficial and progressive ideas on the Democratic platform: universal health care (can anyone say "good Samaritan?), better stewardship for the earth, and a less militant U.S. forgien policy. All three of these directly reflect core Mormon beliefs. However, the Democrat's social agenda (gay marriage and abortion, et al) is unsupportable for many Mormons. Lets face it America, 2 parties just can't cover the diversity of beliefs in our country, and you only need to look at communities like those of the Mormon faith to prove it.
Comment By melissa marriner, 9-14-06can u please send me information about the mormon faith in samoa as that is what my assignment is based on.
thank you very much.