By Nick Gier, New West Unfiltered 4-01-09
Thank you for an enlightened and thorough article about animals and their similarities to humans, and for making a great case for vegetarianism.
Comment By NorCal Cazadora, 4-03-09I really like this piece, but I would argue that eating animals and recognizing their similarities to us are not mutually exclusive notions. In most primitive hunter-gatherer cultures, there is a tremendous respect for the animals they eat (though all cultures seem to draw the line at fish, viewing them as "other" while furred and feathered animals are "us"). Having recently joined the community of hunters, I can tell you that we respect the animals we hunt, kill and eat FAR MORE than your average Joe who buys meat neatly packaged at the grocery store.
Humans don't eat animals, and animals don't eat each other, BECAUSE they are classified as "other," not "us." We eat them, or each other, because that's what it means to be in our particular location in the food chain and the cycle of life.
At least that's how it works in paradise, or Eden, or the natural world. Once humans left that, we cultivated feelings of guilt about this order, and we felt the need to create all sorts of constructs (agriculture, the principle of dominion) to make us feel better about what we do.
Personally, I'm perfectly happy with the gritty order of Eden. Whale, dolphin, and chimp would never be my first choice of meat for precisely the reasons outlined here. But would I eat them if I were hungry and that was my only choice? Yes.
I quit eating meat about 13 months ago. It is one the first discaplines I have ever been able to keep in my life. I believe that man is not superior of life on earth, in fact man comes in at a level of virus and will soon cause his own demise. I will never eat meat even if it means my own death.
Comment By Jay Larry Lundeen, 5-05-09What a delicious irony that several of the animals touted to receive status of Homo legalis, (in order to dissuade Homo sapiens from eating them) are themselves hardwired carnivores.
And there will certainly be unintended consequences of raising certain species above their pay grade. I can envision harried lawyers at the ACLU scurrying on terrible errands to bring equality to these newest persona bonafidelis: A class action suit involving reparations for lab rats. And a worldwide campaign to free the enslaved painting elephants. Anyone with even the slightest imagination will weep uncontrollably at the impending hell-storm of litigation.
Ludwig Feuerbach (1804-1872) is the source of the phrase "One is what one eats." I believe I'll need to dine on raw meat for a week to properly digest not only this phrase, but the entire topic of transmuting certain fauna to a higher sphere within the animal kingdom.
Bon appetit.
Dear Mr. Ludeen,
From your previous postings I have received the impression that your are a practicing Christian. Your clever and flippant response here appears to lack the compassion that the best religious people have for species other than their own.
I find it ironic that it is the conservative Christians who show the least compassion and also a poor understanding of their own scripture.
The Bible is quite clear about giving souls to animals. The Hebrew (nephesh) and the Greek (psyche) are very explicit about this. I have written about this at http://www.class.uidaho.edu/ngier/SoulSermon
Archeological evidence has shown that the traditional view of "the image of God" that has given unique status to human beings is not a metaphysical designation; rather, it is a quasi-political divine appointment of Adam and then the New Adam (Christ) as leaders of humankind on earth. See the link above for the reference for this exciting discovery.
Yours for an accurate reading of scripture,
Nick Gier