By Cate Huisman, 11-05-09
The Sandpoint City Council hit a hot button last year when it proposed a temporary restriction on the construction of drive-through fast-food places. Council members wanted some time to consider how this kind of land use fit with the newly minted Comprehensive Plan, and the city had sprouted a drive-through Jack-in-the-Box while the plan was being cogitated over. Shortly thereafter, a corrugated metal farm shed turned up next to Highway 2 that turned out to be a drive-through convenience store.
After the ban was passed, certain members of the community vehemently voiced their disapproval, and one owner of a restaurant that had both drive-through and sit-down options posted a notice on the order counter suggesting that the city planning director go back to where he came from, inspiring some other community members to dine elsewhere.
So it’s no surprise that the city’s Planning and Zoning commission, charged with drafting the zoning regulations that will implement the Comprehensive Plan, wrestled mightily with this issue at their meeting Tuesday night. None of them anticipates that a permanent citywide ban will stay in place, recognizing that city residents will want to retain the option to eat without having to get out of their cars, especially in the winter months. However, the Comprehensive Plan directs that the central parts of the city be more oriented toward pedestrians, and the commission has to consider the extent to which car-oriented businesses are consistent with this direction. Hence the regulations the commission drafted continue the ban in the downtown area and restrict the imposition of such drive-throughs outside the downtown in areas that are within 100 feet of residences.
The regulations still have to go through public hearings and city council meetings before they are implemented, and the process is sure to generate enough hot air to lower municipal heating bills for any room in which the issue is discussed.
Tell those "smart growth" anti auto, "pedestrian friendly" advocates to take a flying leap. Pass a law requiring all "pedestrian friendly" advocates to walk while eating in the city limits.
Comment By bill stincton, 11-11-09Has the Daily Bee completely given up reporting now? Why are we directed to this news letter? All you anti-auto folks need to consider that many people in the community are older and others don't have time to walk to restaurants, banks, etc. or might live outside town. Unless you want the entire business community to go further down hill then it already has, I suggest you think of everyone's needs and not your "smart growth" anti-business opinion.
Comment By Mickey Garcia, 11-11-09Funny thing happened down in Vegas a few years ago. The City and some of the Casinos bought a bunch of electric scooters for the disabled senior citizens to get around town. Turned out that mostly tourists rented them instead of using the multiple billion dollar tram. Pissed a lot of "urban planners off". Your own wheels are the real deal! Personal Vehicles Rule! Send the "smart growth" planners back to the nuthouse from which they came.
This article was printed from www.newwest.net at the following URL: http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/commissioners_cogitate_over_consumption_by_car/C564/L564/