By Hillary Rosner, 10-06-05
The power of religion to shape environmental views and policy is getting a lot of ink of late, particularly the growing divide between the pro-environment Creation Care movement and the anti-environment forces of the Christian right (increasingly under attack from within their own community) holding fast to the archaic view that God made Earth for humans to plunder.Very interesting piece. Is it really true that Evenagelicals are opposed to wilderness in particular? or is it that they are just generally republican and pro-bush and this follow his lead on this?
Comment By Hillary Rosner, 10-07-05Good question. It's of course not true to say that evangelical Christians are across-the-board, or even overwhelmingly, opposed to wilderness. Many are decidedly pro-wilderness, pro-nature, and in favor of a lot of the same policies endorsed by environmentalists--though the burgeoning alliances between evangelicals and enviros are delicate because environmentalists tend to hold many progressive beliefs that are at odds with fundamentalist Christian doctrine (views about population control, for instance).
However, there is a prevailing view in the evangelical world that is most definitely anti-wilderness--and not simply because of an alliance with Bush and his policies. This school of thinking holds that human-caused climate change is a myth and biodiversity loss is left-wing propaganda. For an excellent explanation of this view, check out the Cornwall Declaration on Environmental Stewardship, a right-wing document signed by many on the Christian Right.
Here's a sample from the Cornwall Declaration:
"Many people believe that "nature knows best," or that the earth–untouched by human hands–is the ideal. Such romanticism leads some to deify nature or oppose human dominion over creation. Our position, informed by revelation and confirmed by reason and experience, views human stewardship that unlocks the potential in creation for all the earth's inhabitants as good. Humanity alone of all the created order is capable of developing other resources and can thus enrich creation, so it can properly be said that the human person is the most valuable resource on earth. Human life, therefore, must be cherished and allowed to flourish."
And, later:
"Some unfounded or undue concerns include fears of destructive manmade global warming, overpopulation, and rampant species loss."
The Christian Right organization Focus on the Family has a similar statement on the environment, which you can read as a pdf here. The gist is that environmental ills are the result of God punishing us for "40 million innocent preborn children," rather than because we repeatedly clearcut forests, pave over critical ecosystems, and kill off top-level predators.
Focus on the Family also has a statement denying human-caused climate change, which comes with this gem: "Any issue that seems to put plants and animals above humans is one that we cannot support." Doesn't seem like there's a lot of room for wildernes conservation in there.
Hillary,
Some other very inspiring work is going on at the National Religious Partnership for the Environment: http://www.nrpe.org I listened to Paul Gorman, the executive Director, speak back in September and he was extremely moving. There is a decent, though not as great as that speech, interview with him in E agazine here: http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1594/is_6_13/ai_94011499
I think that students shouldn't avoid a chance to purchase <a >custom communication and media essays</a> using the assignment writing services, simply because this can manifestly be a great pathway to confirm the writing skillfulness.
This article was printed from www.newwest.net at the following URL: http://www.newwest.net/main/article/wild_salvation/