Outdoors & Conservation

Fewer Hunters = Less Conservation

By Dan Richardson, 1-12-06

The Cascadia Score Card blog has interested connect-the-dots editorial on the decline of hunting and fishing in Oregon (and nationally), stories in The Oregonian and some magazines, and what this means for the future of conservation. One dilemma: Progressive, liberal folks see hunting and fishing as "retrograde," but hunters and fishermen pay high special taxes which fund conservation efforts. Traditionally more liberal outdoorsfolks — hikers, birdwatchers — pay bupkis (those damn Northwest Forest passes notwithstanding)...and by turning their nose up at "Red-Staters" who hunt and fish, may be adding to the problem.

(Speaking of which, The Atlantic Monthly's current issue argues that the whole Red State-Blue State divide is something of a myth, conjured up by politicians and a small core of die-hard culture warriors on either side.) [End of article]
Comment By Alex Boian, 3-16-06

For such an interesting idea, there should be a much larger post. The future of conservation seems more and more to be disparate groups aligning over a single joint interest. Oil and gas revenues go to LWCF, etc...

This article was printed from www.newwest.net at the following URL: http://www.newwest.net/main/article/fewer_hunters_less_conservation/