By Randy Harward, 2-21-06
Some among us believe hosting another Olympics is a good idea: why? What did the 2002 Winter Olympics do for Utah, really? We got some tourism money, some serious TV time. The LDS Church put on a public-realtions debutante gown and flashed its pearly whites at the world. Cheap Trick and the Foo Fighters played to 150 people in a tent. We have some new winter sports venues and several Olympics-related adornments around the city. There was that juicy scandal. People made serious money on cheap shit. (And we got to laugh at the expense of the purchasers of said crap.) Are we better off now than we were four years ago? Enough that another Olympics sixteen years after the fact is a good idea?Randy,
I think you make a great case for hosting the Olympics again. All we got was:
* Tourism money
* Serious TV time
* The LDS Church and other local institutions all got some good PR
* Lots of entertainers performed here. Some in a tent. Some in a stadium with 60,000 people on global televesion.
* People bought stuff from local venders; local venders make buckets full of money
* We are WAY better off than four years ago.
It took about 16 years to get the Olympics last time. Probably time to start thinking about it anyway.
ddt
Thanks for your comment, Devin. But those things only enhance my point that pursuing another Olympics this soon is redundant and greedy, and that we should allow another city a chance to host the games.
This article was printed from www.newwest.net at the following URL: http://www.newwest.net/main/article/why_really_iwhy_i/