By Tonya Poole, 3-18-06
On a long road trip at six or seven years old my mom turned around and covered my eyes so I wouldn't see the two puppies scrambling across the busy freeway, dodging cars. But it was too late, I'd already spotted them. For a long time I let myself believe they made it to the other side. In reality, I'm sure they didn't. But twenty-five years later and that image is still burned in my memory. Last year in Albuquerque after the finale of the International Balloon Fiesta in October, we rode up to the northeast heights to get some photos of a spectacular moon before riding the hour home to Santa Fe. Coming down Tramway, I grabbed Shane's arm and yelled "stop!" as a dog stepped out onto the road a few feet in front of us under the lamplight.Tonya, I certainly see your point but I don't think this is such a cut-and-dried thing. We debated carefully the pros and cons of letting our dog run loose around the house. She virtually never went up the street, mostly cruised the other way in the woods and by the river, and she was a dog for whom roaming the homestead was central to her being. She would have been miserable kept in the house, or in a small fenced enclosure. The more free you let a dog be, the more dangerous it is for them, but it's a trade-off. Kaela, my dog, got hit by a car on the street above our house and died at age 11. Would I have done differently & kept her enclosed in the many situations in her life in which that would have been safer for her? I don't think so. For dogs that need to roam & run (not all breeds, but many) cages and chains are very cruel. Not caring if they come home or not, well, that is a different thing entirely.
Comment By Tonya Poole, 3-19-06No, it isn't cut and dried (what is?), and I agree that keeping any dog on a short chain or in cages/dog runs is cruel. We've almost always had, largely for this reason, large properties with extra large fenced areas for them to run... and when that can't happen, we've got soft fabric 200ft. tie-outs for them. These are nice, as they're light and soft/pliable and not cumbersome to the dogs, and allow them to explore pretty freely within that 200 ft. radius in any direction. No, it's not as ideal for the dog as allowing them to roam free - and I do understand the value in that. Though you're right, it's a trade off. But when it comes down to making that decision, I just can't feel ok about taking the chance. It's not only about the dog's safety, free-roaming dogs on the road endanger others too. There was a small girl hit and killed back in New England when I was growing up who, in trying to save her dog who'd run out into the road, ran out after him. And another case not long ago up in Seattle when some friends of ours witnessed an accident - a family in a car swerving to avoid a large dog, and causing a collision that ultimately paralyzed one of the passengers.
I think in wide open rural areas allowing a dog to have the run of a large property that's either set back from the road or has very little traffic isn't such a big deal. But I think keeping an eye on where they are and what they're doing is smart, as is bringing them back in at night - when the chances of a tragedy are more likely. Most of the accidents/close-calls or kills we've seen have been after dark.
If you live in the city, dogs should not run free off your property ever in my opinion and by most cities published law.
If you live in the country (and the law allows) I can more easily the desire to make your own choices / tradeoffs but accept all the consequences including civil penalties for various types of damage (including cars damaged and people injured in collisons with stray pets or caused by trying to avoid them) and criminal penalities for human attacks that I read about several times a week.
This is one reason why some people do not want to live in compact neighborhoods. The dog owners who want to let their dogs run free... and the people who do not want the threat of unknown sometimes harassing dogs in tight living places. I support alternative places to suit different lifestyle preferences and laws govern many externalities of personal choice including rules governing dogs. Traditional suburbs and exurbs are really in between city and country are get treated as city by some, country by others. In some ways I think folks would benefit from resolving which basic type place they are for clarity and coherence, level of socially determined governance over personal choices rather than debate this philsophical split on each and every issue; but if the law is a mixture, live by it, or try to change it or move.
This article was printed from www.newwest.net at the following URL: http://www.newwest.net/main/article/mans_best_friend_id_hate_to_be_the_enemy/