Earth Week
UM Faculty Members Rally For Endangered Species Act
By Tad Sooter, 4-21-06
 |
|
 | |
| Caption: Monte joins UM's Len Broberg in support of less domesticated wildlife. | |
|
Economist John Duffield presented probably the most interesting perspective on the value of the act – Duffield has been surveying the economics of wolf recovery in Yellowstone National Park since the reintroduction program began, and considers the grey wolf an example of how the ESA can be a boon for the economy as well as animals. Duffield said the money wolves bring to the park far outweighs the costs of lost livestock and hunting permits.
“Wolves are what economists call a public good, millions of people can come and see them. Cattle and sheep, those are private goods,” Duffield said.
He said 94 percent of Yellowstone visitors surveyed listed wildlife viewing as their main reason for coming. Grizzlies are still king (55 percent of visitors said they came to see the big bears specifically) but wolves are now the number-two attraction. Four out of the top five wildlife species are large predators, and wolves alone brought an estimated $35 million into Yellowstone last year. Just $270,000 was needed to reimburse ranchers for livestock lost to wolves last year, Duffield added. The wolves’ impact on the elk population has been matched in a dramatic decrease in hunting permits sold, but the annual revenue for the states has only been $140,000 at most – and those losses are minimal compared to the economic, environmental and emotional value of a healthy wolf population, he said.
The other high profile ESA success has been the recovery of Montana and Yellowstone grizzly populations, said Chris Servheen, Grizzly Bear Recovery coordinator for the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and an adjunct forestry professor. He said much more needs to be done to protect grizzly habitat and a strong ESA will be key for protecting species like them.
“We have the tools necessary to recover many threatened species. The main obstacle is a lack of funding and a lack of support,” Servheen said.
Environmental studies director Len Broberg pointed to bulltrout, eagles and linx as examples of the ESA working in Montana. By working to recover threatened species, the ESA often ends up improving water quality and the surrounding landscape, he said.
“The Endangered Species Act is a safety net for wildlife," Broberg said. “It’s about protecting those animals that are on the brink of disappearing forever.” [End of article]
These are the people teaching our kids?? God help us. The ESA is 33 years old, has recovered less than 1 percent of the species on its list, cost us billions of dollars, retarded economic growth, and created an industry of wacko groups that uses it to raise cash. One would think that professors would, well, think! This law needs to be overhauled, not praised. The UM faculty may need an overhaul too.
Comment By Cathie, 4-22-06How does that saying go? "Save one life, save a generation."...
Look Bob - why do people come to Montana - to view the strip mining and clearcutting and fish the cyanide-laced waters? Or is there not a whole industry built on the kind of stuff that brings millions of tourists here a year - something you well acknowledge in your post. Industry = jobs, right?
And as for the other industries, the only ones who were - are - getting rich are the corporate owners, thanks to tax breaks given to them by (guess?) Montana was never known for its well-off middle class, even 33 years ago.
Bob needs to get his facts straight:
According to the USFWS, the Endangered Species Act has been nearly 100 percent successful -- 99 percent of the 1,200 plus species that have been listed have been saved from going extinct. Furthermore, according to a recent article in Bioscience, 68 percent of the species listed have either stabized or are on the road to recovery.
Species had been declining for hundreds of years before the passage of the Endangered SPecies ACt in 1973, so it's logical that it may take more than 30 years to recover them from the brink of extinction. It's arguably one of the most successful conservation laws in history. No wonder polluters and wealthy land developers (and Bob) seek to gut it.