Livin' La Vida Local

Recreationists Need to Give Back to the Land We Love

By Ken Wright, 6-15-06

The river is up, and the boaters are out. Along Durango’s Animas River, and all over the West, rafts float and kayaks surf waves and endo in holes. And it’s not just river running: in the river, fishermen are fishing. In the hills above the rivers, hikers are walking and backpackers are camping, mountain bikers are riding and horseback riders are packing and climbers are scaling. And downstream, canyoneers are exploring and sightseers are looking and birders are stalking …

And on and on. Isn’t this why we live in the West? Because right around us, all around us, where ever we live out here, is big, open, and wild places. And lots of public spaces where we can get out and challenge ourselves and savor the land.

It’s good people get outside and appreciate the land. But behind this boom is a nagging question: Where is the accompanying boom of people standing by the land? Where is the army of defenders fighting to keep the “public” in our public land?

Outdoor recreationists claim to be environmentally aware, and they preach the right to use the West’s abundance of public lands. For too many, though, calories burned while playing is all the energy they have for the land. Or maybe a few bucks here and there for a membership in the Sierra Club or somesuch group (as long as it comes with a pretty magazine!).

My question is: Where are all these hordes of people we see out on the trails and in the mountains and on the rivers when the county commissioners meet? When the Sierra Club actually has a person-to-person meeting? When some federal agency holds public meetings on land management? Where are their letters to the editor when the Bush Administration cuts budgets to the Park Service or Forest Service or wants to sell off out public lands?

“Sentiment without action is the ruin of the soul,” said Henry Thoreau 150 years ago. It’s still true. It’s time to give back, folks. To be environmentally aware means to be environmentally active, and the right to use our public lands comes with the responsibility to do something for those lands.

Why? Here a few good reasons, just for starters.

Because recreation – and the places needed for recreation -- needs to be recognized for its importance to Westerners. It’s the nature of our present world: Although the land has a right to exist for its own intrinsic reasons, in modern society uses must justify themselves economically and politically. Here, silence is not golden, it’s fatal.

Because recreationists need to improve their images. Believe it or not, for example, some people think bicyclists are idiotic trail and road Nazis, that rock climbers are rude little children with no respect for private property, and that hunters are armed drunks. It’s takes effort to dispel these harmful ideas. It takes education. It takes involvement. Until then, expect more rules and regulations and lock-outs.

And lastly, the most obvious and moral reason: Because love and defense go hand in hand. Because once it’s gone, it ain’t coming back. Because if we don’t do it, who will? Because our kids – and our kids’ kids – are going to need these places, these sacred, sane spaces, even more than we do now.

So, sure, spend the day boating, floating, casting, climbing, wandering, riding … then, sure, go drink a few beers at the pub sharing stories about your great days in the sun. But after that, there’s that meeting to go to, that letter to write, that place to defend, the river to fight for, that voice of yours to raise …

The land needs it.
[End of article]
Comment By Breckenridge, 6-15-06

Yes. If we want to enjoy the West we love we should be ready to (a) work to protect it; and (b) recreate in a way that doesn't destroy its value.

Minor quibble - I think the quote you attribute to Thoreau is actually from another anarchist-wilderness lover - Ed Abbey.

Comment By Lori McCullough, 6-16-06

I loved this article, from its message down to the tone of it. Not preachy or condescending. Perfect! Loved it!! Good job Ken Wright.

Lori McCullough, Tread Lightly!, Inc.

Comment By Leaf, 6-18-06

Thank you for publishing this article. I work in public land planning. People have no idea how important their county commissioners are as part of public land management. The local view can sometimes be pretty narrowly focused on psrsonal and economic agendas. It's important to who they are and what their politics are, then let them know yours. Elected officials care about numbers and votes.

The other important mention is the threat to public lands from efforts to privatize the Forest Service and the funding situation. Who would you rather have manage your public lands. A corporation influenced by money and votes or an agency that answers to critters, and fish, and things that grow in addition to people, and not just special interest groups.

Imagine trying to boat, hike, ride, camp, etc in a sea of RVs, OHVs, and billboards. Not that there isn't a place for that kind of fun but what if those are your only choices? Somebody has to stand up for management of public lands that looks to the future. If the best you can do is send a form letter don't send it to the Forest Servcie. Send it, or even better-real letters, to Congress and the Whitehouse. Oh yeah, don't forget your county commissioners.

This article was printed from www.newwest.net at the following URL: http://www.newwest.net/main/article/recreationists_need_to_give_back_to_the_land_we_love/