ONLY TWO STATES NOT INTERESTED
Adventure Cycling Coordinating New National Bicycle Route System
Massive proposal moving ahead despite tight budgets and lack of bicycle advocacy groups in some states.By Bill Schneider, 2-23-10
![]() |
|
| Graphic courtesy of the Adventure Cycling Association. | |
There’s no such thing as “too big to fail” at the Adventure Cycling Association (ACA).
Formed back on America’s Bicentennial in 1976, the Missoula-based nonprofit has long ago become the nation’s leader in providing advice, maps and detailed route information for long-distance cyclists, including the development of an extensive system of signature bicycle routes for both self-contained riders and those who like a hot shower and soft bed every night.
Now, energized by its past success and undaunted by dwindling government budgets or the sheer massiveness of its new project, ACA has started, in partnership with state transportation agencies, planning and coordinating the U.S. Bicycle Route System (USBRS).
When completed, the new system will link urban, suburban and rural communities in every state with convenient and easy routes, two or three per state.
“The ACA has provided staff support for the USBRS and essentially become the national coordinator for the project,” ACA special projects director Ginny Sullivan told NewWest.Net in a phone interview, but she emphasized the state transportation department decision to become involved is the real key to the system’s success.
“The USBRS will try to link urban suburban and rural communities,” she explained. “Our existing ACA routes are very rural and don’t take in urban areas and do not make cities cycling destinations. The new system links destinations, including metropolitan areas, using convenient and easy routes.”
Safety will also always be an important issue, Sullivan said, with preference given to low traffic routes with shoulders or off-road facilities like bikeways when feasible.
“The main difficulty is getting through suburban areas and still have safe, efficient cycling routes,” she said.
“It’s exciting because the states that are on board, about a dozen so far, are actively engaged, more than what I expected,” she added. Among those that have expressed the most interest so far are Arizona, California, Georgia, Florida, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Nevada, and Tennessee.
Only two states, Montana and South Carolina, responded to a recent ACA survey saying they weren’t interested in participating and 15 states, including Idaho, haven’t responded yet. All other states have indicated some level of interest in being part of the new system of bicycle routes.
The main reason for less than enthusiastic interest is limited resources. The Montana’ Transportation Department, for example, responded stated, “Montana is not investing resources into the development of the USBR. The implementation of the USBR is not seen as adding value to the cycling aspects of Montana’s transportation system.”
So, clearly, ACA has some hard cranking to do before getting all states on board and making the USBRS a reality.
Again undaunted, Sullivan said, “We just need to figure how to engage the states in a positive way.”
Free money would be one proven method for getting state agencies more interested, and that might be forthcoming. Congressmen James Oberstar (D-MN) and Peter DeFazio (D-WA) are working on legislation that, if passed, might provide states with federal funds to help with the planning and implementation of the USBRS.
Another problem Sullivan has encountered is the lack of state advocacy groups. Again using Montana as an example, the state has no statewide advocacy nonprofit to work with state government and legislatures on bicycle-related issues.
“It’s still just a plan,” Sullivan reminded, “only a starting point for states to start planning. Ultimately, the idea is that the routes will be on the state highway map.”
Also, this spring, Google Maps plans to launch a cycling option similar to the current walking option, and the USBRS routes, when established, will show up on these searches as long as state governments have shared this information with Google. In other words, Google “by bicycle” option will recommend the USBRS route, if available, instead of the shortest route.
For more information on the USBRS, click here.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.





Comments
However, I'm trying to imagine why there would be a huge financial outlay in establishing this system, on the part of states.
Are states being asked to identify the most optimum bicycle routes as they already exist, or does this "system" require improvements to the existing infrastructure, where bike friendliness is marginal? (A quick review of the "corridor criteria" doesn't suggest that any major outlay is a requirement.) Or is the ACA asking states to contribute to a common kitty for some reason...?
This would be an ideal task for the state bike/pedestrian coordinator. And I'd think the bike tourists of any given state could provide valuable insight to establish a list of the preferred routes.
Go to our website for other systems like La Route Verte in Quebec or the National Cycle Network (which also serves pedestrians) in the UK. http://www.adventurecycling.org/usbrs
This project has been a great opening not only to state bike/ped coordinators but also other state transportation staff and cycling advocates. Ginny Sullivan, our heroic lead staffer on this, and I just came back from a trip to WA and OR and met with a bunch of folks from all sectors interested in making these routes happen. More here at our blog: http://blog.adventurecycling.org/2010/02/rock-stars-wheel-urbanism-seattle.html
Thanks for your interest.
* system that can connect urban, suburban and rural areas (we have heard a lot from agencies, especially on the east coast, about the need for this kind of connective network)
* visibility and legitimacy for cycling on the nation's roadways
* modest investment fund that can be used to close gaps in biking networks
* economic development and jobs (check out La Route Verte, which generates more than $160 million a year in economic activity - Quebec Province markets the whole network as a draw)
Many more reasons at our website but complete, signed official *networks* are a proven stimulant to more cycling and cyclists.
Let us not forget that many incredible backcountry trails on public lands, including sections of the Continental Divide Trail, are threatened for closure to bicycles through multiple access challenges.
Let us work collectively as hard to maintain the visibility and legitimacy of bicycles on backcountry singletrack that are also a proven stimulant to more cycling and cyclists.
I grew up in a town in Georgia (not normally thought of as a place of progressives and it wasn't) that had a separate bike path system all over the community. As kids we could bike all over.
Now living in Missoula, I wouldn't think of letting our kids even bike out of the neighborhood. There aren't enough paths. The county is working at building a network. And I know the city has the river system and Bitterroot line (which is incomplete), but those are only accessible by a few neighborhoods.
We would love to bike all over town to various events, but we don't have a bike system in place. And the lines painted on the sides of the roadways don't do a thing for safe biking by families.
A bike network should be safe, separate and protected from car and truck traffic.
rad7 : 30% off domains
gda348s : 30% off domains
goaz006q : 30% off domains
pf25 : 25% off order of $75 or more
Godaddy hosting discounts:
rush20 : 20% Off Hosting (1,2,3 yr accounts)
tapes8 : 10% Off Monthly hosting accounts
.
Used some of these for a while now. Print these out.
You alone? Martured personal gay dating sites only