guest opinion: plum creek and mark rey
Backdoor Deals on Public Lands Deeply Disappointing
By Clark Fork Coalition & Hellgate Hunters and Anglers, Guest Writer, 5-08-08
In Montana, we are proud of our sunshine laws that keep government actions open and responsive to the public. Unfortunately, the laws that apply to the federal government are not as enlightened, which can sometimes lead to nasty surprises from Washington—surprises that impact the clean water and open spaces we treasure on our public lands.
Montanans got just such a surprise two weeks ago, when the Missoula County Commissioners and Senator Jon Tester discovered that Undersecretary of Agriculture Mark Rey, the Bush Administration political appointee who oversees the Forest Service, has been quietly negotiating a backroom deal with real estate developer Plum Creek, which owns some 1.3 million acres of land in western Montana. The deal would give Plum Creek unfettered development rights on thousands of miles of old Forest Service logging roads for residential subdivision.
Historically, Plum Creek has used its lands for timber production, land that includes the headwaters of our rivers and streams in the Clark Fork basin, and provides habitat for grizzly bear, elk, and bull trout. But in the last decade or so, Plum Creek has undertaken a massive effort to sell its lands—in Montana and around the country—for real estate purposes.
First, though, Plum Creek needs access from the U.S. Forest Service to develop its land. The quietly-negotiated road access rights, which could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars to Plum Creek, would greatly facilitate the company’s plans to develop much of Montana’s backcountry for subdivisions and trophy homes. Plus, the agreements would set a nationwide precedent for allowing private development to create “driveways” through public lands without first allowing public input.
Luckily, our elected officials blew the whistle. On April 28th, Mark Rey arrived in a packed Missoula meeting room to explain himself to officials from five western Montana counties. Unfortunately, he did not use that opportunity to shed much light on the 18 months of negotiations that led to the secret access deal. Instead, he repeatedly made it clear that he would not seriously consider the officials’ requests to have inputinto the terms of the deal before he signs it.
It’s deeply disappointing that Undersecretary Rey and the Bush Administration don’t feel that Montanans deserve a voice in this process. Montanans know what we lose when our forests are subdivided. We lose access to our favorite hunting grounds and fishing holes. We lose our snowmobile and hiking trials. And our local governments get the burden of providing emergency services and fire protection to thousands of new homes deep in the woods, at huge cost to local taxpayers. Our federal officials ought to treat our local government as partners in these negotiations. Sadly, they didn’t even see the need to tell them the negotiations were taking place.
Indeed, Undersecretary Rey said the Forest Service doesn’t even know where the easements he is set to give away are located, or how many miles of roads this deal would affect, although we can be reasonably sure that it would be thousands of miles. Worse, Rey said he has no intention on finding out where these easements are until after the agreement is signed.
Our state government knows better than to act this way. State officials routinely get exactly the same kinds of requests from Plum Creek to cross state trust land for development purposes. They negotiate access – but they do so in public, and only after complying with the laws that make sure that local governments and the public get the chance to voice their concerns. Undersecretary Rey ought to follow their example.
It’s not too late for the public to get a voice in the process. The Missoula County Commissioners and Senator Tester have urged Rey not to sign the Plum Creek deal without preparing a proper environmental impact statement with full public input, as federal law requires him to do. Other counties with Plum Creek land are making similar requests. These officials deserve your support.
We thought it was common sense that Montanans ought to have a say in federal decisions that have such a profound effect on Montanans’ way of life. It would be nice if the federal government thought so too.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.
Like to receive our print magazine, The New West? Click here for free subscription information.
Comments
Rey bio, us gov.
I can't speak for the groups above, but for myself, I don't want to see ANY PC timberlands turned into subdivisions. I see all this yapping about the easement issue as a distraction from what should really be happening, which is these groups out kicking butt trying to figure out how to stop this development. All the letter writing from Tester and whining during so called "public input" sure isn't going to stop it. If you think it will, then you've already lost.