THE TRAPDOOR TO EXTINCTION

Do You Remember the Last Time You Saw a Porcupine?


By Bill Schneider, 9-22-05

 
  Photo credit, Andrew Houser. www.photos.houserdesign.com

One of the icons of our forests seems to be slipping away, virtually unnoticed, while wildlife managers scramble to find out what’s happening.

Wildlife biologists know the porcupine population over most of the northern Rockies (USA and Canada) has declined sharply, but they don’t know why or how serious it is. Some wildlife biologists fear we might be witnessing a major extinction event—or I should say not witnessing it.

“We know the porcupine population is declining, but we don’t know what’s going on,� notes Kerry Foresman, a professor of wildlife biology at the University of Montana and renown small mammal expert, “but we’re trying to get funding to find out.�

Foresman is not the type of professor who spends every waking moment in dusty labs and classrooms. He’s “in the field� all the time, and he sees a plummeting porcupine population. “I’ve only seen two or three in the past five years,� he said. “And lots of other wildlife biologists are noticing the same thing.�

Currently, Foresman is trying to find funds to start a research assistant working on this problem, so we can have “some facts.� Right now, it’s only, as he puts it, “general observations.� Anecdotal information is normally considered unreliable wildlife research.

Ditto for Steve Gniadek, a wildlife biologist at Glacier National Park. “We had one sighting this summer near St. Mary,� he notes. “That’s the first reported sighting in the park in three years.�

Gniadek tells of a winter track survey park rangers did “for at least ten years� throughout the 1990s. During that time, rangers did not see one single porcupine track. “This is sort of a secretive species, and they don’t move around much,� he observes, “but they do move around, so you’d think we’d see some tracks.�

Glacier no longer has funds to continue the track survey, nor has Gniadek been able to secure money for a new project to study the porcupine decline. “I’m afraid the porcupine is already extinct in the park,� Gniadek frets.

Extinction, incidentally, occurs when a population falls below the point where it can’t recover, not when the last animal dies. And the trapdoor to extinction always seems to be open.

“What’s going on here?� Gniadek asks. “This is an important species.�

Jim Williams, wildlife manager for the Flathead region at Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Department agrees completely. “We don’t see that many anymore, but we have no idea what’s going on.�

Williams, however, thinks the major decline is occurring west of the Continental Divide, and that the porcupine is holding its own on the east slope, but that is, in his words, “a data-free analysis.�

None of these wildlife experts have any “best theories� on why the quill pig is disappearing, but say it’s likely to be a “combination of factors.� Those factors include changing or declining habitat, disease, predation or indiscriminate killing.

They discount habitat changes because porcupines use a wide range of habitats and there really has not been major region-wide change in habitat. Forest fires and fire management policies are one possibility, but experts doubt this could be responsible for the decline.

Some people simply like to kill things, anything, so they shoot porcupines on sight, but fortunately very few people do this. For the record, porcupines have no protection under state wildlife laws. In Idaho and Montana, it’s perfectly legal to kill every porcupine you see. The Idaho law specifically says “unprotected species� such as the porcupine “may be taken in any amount, at any time, and in any manner not prohibited by state or federal law.� Ditto for Montana where porcupines are listed as a “non-managed species.� Again, however, most people don’t have such a bloodlust and like seeing the porky harmlessly waddling along the forest floor. Mindless killing is probably not seriously contributing to the rapid decline.

In the 1940s and 1950s, foresters and timber companies actually promoted the poisoning of porcupines to save trees, but this is ancient history and really could not be affecting populations today.

As we all know, porcupines have a good defensive system, which keeps predation to a minimum. Only the mountain lion and fisher effectively prey on porcupines. Fisher numbers are very low in this region, making it an unlikely culprit, but mountain lion numbers have increased in recent years and could be at least partly responsible for the decline. Williams doubts predation by mountain lions could be “limiting� because it didn’t happen in the past when both lion and porcupine populations were high.

Could be a serious disease affecting porcupines? Perhaps, but who knows about porcupine diseases? Nobody. Porcupines are big rodents, so a rodent disease could be having a major impact. If so, it could easily be too late before we find out what it is.

The point is, of course, we have no clue why we’re losing the porcupine, and we aren’t even trying to find out. Wildlife managers want to find out, but getting funding for an “unprotected, non-managed� species is very difficult. High-profile charismatic megafauna like bears, elk, bighorn sheep, and wolves tend to suck up all the limited research money.

Gniadek, for one, stresses about something like this happening right before our eyes, and nobody really notices or cares. “It’s scary to think that this might be happening with other species, too,� he notes. “I say the national parks have a strong responsibility to protect all species, but it’s hard to do it if you don’t know how the populations are doing, and we can’t know that if we don’t do some type of monitoring. We need to be out there looking and be aware of what’s going on.�



Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.

NEW WEST FEATURES                                                                 More>>

Advertisement

Comments

By hal herring, 9-22-05
By Joan Opyr, 9-23-05

 

Marketplace