Commercializing Energy From The Sun

DOE Funds Cheap-Solar Research


By Richard Martin, 4-11-08

 
 

Aiming to jump-start the U.S. solar-power industry, the Dept. of Energy will put up $13.7 million in the next three years to support university-led projects to bring less expensive solar technology to market.

Hit in recent months by falling stock prices and the cost of commercializing sophisticated photovoltaic technology, the solar industry needs to find ways to hasten the development of cheap, wide-spread arrays. Under its “Solar America” initiative, the Bush Administration has set a target of bringing the cost of solar energy down to levels competitive with conventional electricity production by 2015.

“Harnessing the natural and abundant power of the sun and more cost-effectively converting it into energy has enormous potential to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and provide greater stability in electricity costs,” DOE Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Alexander Karsner.

The research projects selected by the DOE include a Georgia Tech program for “Next- Generation High-Efficiency Commercial Silicon Solar Cells,” and an effort by Arizona State scientists to streamline the process of inspecting and verifying photovoltaic cells.

All together, the projects could reduce the cost of electricity produced by photovoltaic systems from the current levels, 18-23 cents per kilowatt hour to 5-10 per Kw/hour.

In other energy news:

-- Energy production uses, and currently wastes, prodigious amounts of water. Now the U.S. Senate has passed a bill sponsored by Ken Salazar of Colorado “that could allow for the recovery of usable water from sources contaminated by oil and gas drilling operations,” according to the Greeley Tribune. The “More Water, More Energy, Less Waste Act of 2007” would require the Department of Interior to evaluate the possibility of recovering and treating so-called “produced water,” which has been contaminated when brought to the surface during oil and gas drilling or coal-bed methane extraction, and using it for irrigation or other purposes.

-- Possibly ending a long wrangle on how to distribute the windfall from federal mineral leasing rights, the Colorado senate passed a bill that would simplify the current system and establish permanent funds for local communities affected by the drilling boom and for higher education in the state. “Both of those funds could fill with more than $600 million over the next decade,” reports Politics West, “and even more if the state receives extra revenue from the leasing of Roan Plateau, near Rifle.”

-- The big ‘M’ on the mountainside above the Colorado School of Mines, in Golden, has been illuminated for a century. For its centennial, members of CSM’s Blue Key International Honor Society will swap out the 1,653 incandescent light bulbs that make up the M, replacing them with energy-efficient light-emitting diodes, called LEDs. The LEDs will use about one-sixth the energy as the current bulbs, student Steven Meyerhoff told The Rocky Mountain News. 



Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.

Like to receive our print magazine, The New West? Click here for free subscription information.

Advertisement

Comments

when will the federal government try doing buisness differently, i.e. passing on the liabilities to the public while allowing the profits of industry to be privatized? personally, i am sick and tired of 'cleaning up' after industrial operations like oil and gas development. clean up is part of the extraction/mining sector and should be paid for out of the profits derived from exploiting the environment. senator salazar lives in the san luis valley, home of the largest underground fresh water aquafer in north america where oil and gas exploration and development threaten the water quality of 130 million acre feet of potable water. this legislation is a disgrace and a sellout to industry interests by encouraging this activity and its accompaning environmental degradation impacts. this is not a minor item to the residents of the san luis valley who depend upon the aquafer for agricultural and municipal water sources.
An investment of $13 million is a pittance. It's pathetic! It demonstrates the misplaced priorities of this administration and the nation as whole. For most of us we have no context to measure $13 million. It sounds like like a lot of money--but it's nothing in the big scheme of things.

As a comparison, let me just give one number from another program which in my view is a waste of federal funds--the Conservation Reserve Program that has already paid farmers $36 billion not to farm highly erosion prone lands--lands that legally they should not be able to farm anyway if existing environmental laws were really enforced. No matter what you think about the CRP, it is an example of the large amount of money we could spend on something that we viewed as important.

If we spent a similar amount ($36 Billion) insulating all homes in America, or spent a billion on solar energy research, etc. we might, just might, save the nation from the massive disruption we are heading for from the twice threats of global warming and fossil fuel depletion and subsequent rise in energy costs.

Your Comment

Comment policy:

NewWest.Net encourages robust and lively, but civil participation from our readers. By posting here, you agree to the NewWest.Net terms of service. You agree to keep your comments on topic, respectful and free of gratuitous profanity. Contributions that engage in personal attacks, racism, bigotry, hatred or are otherwise patently offensive will be subject to removal.

Other than using a filter that scans for comment spam, we do not moderate contributions before they are posted and we do not review every thread, so we ask that you help us in keeping the discussions civil and appropriate. Please email info@newwest.net to notify us of comments that may violate these guidelines. Thanks for your help and cooperation. Click here for some tips on how to best interact on NewWest.Net.

Name

Email

Remember my name and email address.

Notify me of follow-up comments.

Advertisement