Coal-Bama

Energy Scare Tactics Wide Right


By Richard Martin, 11-03-08

 
  Look! It's a clean coal plant!

This morning, on E-Day Minus 1, I got two emails from coal industry associations claiming that Barack Obama wants to “bankrupt” the coal industry. They’re equally bogus.

“Obama Plan To ‘Bankrupt’ Clean Coal Would Cost Hundreds of Thousands Of Jobs,” trumpeted a release from the Western Business Roundtable. The statement cited “news reports that Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama intends to make it so costly to build advanced clean coal power plants with carbon capture and sequestration that it will ‘bankrupt’ any company that tries to do so.

“I am shocked that any candidate for public office, Democrat or Republican, would suggest bankrupting any industry, much less one that literally keeps America’s lights on each day,” Wyoming state senator Bill Vasey , a Democrat, said in a release from the pro-drilling-and-mining group Americans for American Energy.

The AAE release did not cite any actual statements from Obama, taking it on faith that he intends to “bankrupt” the coal industry. The WBR statement, though, provided Obama’s actual words – words that the flaks producing these misleading press missives either didn’t read or chose to ignore.

Here’s what Obama said, in an interview earlier this year with the San Francisco Chronicle:

“What I’ve said is that we would put a cap and trade system in place that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than anybody else’s out there. … That will create a market in which whatever technologies are out there that are being presented, whatever power plants that are being built, that they would have to meet the rigors of that market and the ratcheted down caps that are being placed, imposed every year. So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it’s just that it will bankrupt them because they’re going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.

Adds Obama later in the interview: “If technology allows us to use coal in a clean way, we should pursue it.”

So if you actually look at what he’s saying, it’s No. 1, we should create a cap-and-trade system that will use market forces to make future conventional coal-fired plants non-viable, and No. 2, we should pursue clean coal plants to the degree that the technology develops to enable them.

That’s a long way from threatening to “bankrupt clean coal,” isn’t it?



Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.

NEW WEST FEATURES                                                                 More>>

Advertisement

Comments

By Dave Skinner, 11-03-08
By Daryl L. Hunter, 11-03-08
By Matthew Koehler, 11-04-08
By jed, 11-04-08
By Daryl L. Hunter, 11-04-08
By Daryl L. Hunter, 11-04-08
By Matthew Koehler, 11-04-08
By Daryl L. Hunter, 11-04-08
By Brad, 11-04-08
By Amperatt, 11-04-08

Comment policy:

NewWest.Net encourages robust and lively, but civil participation from our readers. By posting here, you agree to the NewWest.Net terms of service. You agree to keep your comments on topic, respectful and free of gratuitous profanity. Contributions that engage in personal attacks, racism, sexism, bigotry, hatred or are otherwise patently offensive will be subject to removal.

Other than using a filter that scans for comment spam, we do not moderate contributions before they are posted and we do not review every thread, so we ask that you help us in keeping the discussions civil and appropriate. Please email info@newwest.net to notify us of comments that may violate these guidelines. Thanks for your help and cooperation. Click here for some tips on how to best interact on NewWest.Net.

Your Comment

Name

Email

Remember my name and email address.

Notify me of follow-up comments.

 

Marketplace