Spade & Spoon: Localizing the Way Westerners Eat
EPA’s Holiday Gift to Big Ag
By Kisha Lewellyn Schlegel, 12-25-07
 | |
|
This Christmas season those who play naughty received an early gift from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). On December 21st the EPA announced a proposed rule change that would exempt large livestock operators from the need to report releases of hazardous substances to the air when they come from animal waste. Under the proposed rules, they would no longer need to disclose hazards like ammonia and hydrogen sulfide to local, state and federal agencies.
The EPA argues that this approach is “better” for reporting hazardous contamination because farms are burdened with current reporting requirements.
But in a recent response, Ed Hopkins, Director of the Sierra Club’s Environmental Quality Program wrote, “Once again Bush’s EPA is poised to put polluters before public health. EPA’s new proposal would let factory farms off the hook for releasing hazardous chemicals into our air- exempting these large livestock operations from even the most basic of pollution laws.”
Factory farms dump 500 million tons of animal waste per year, pollution that leaches into rivers and streams, fouls the air and spreads disease. According to Virginia Tech’s, research air pollution from ammonia is a primary concern as ammonia binds to other air particles, forming particulates that can penetrate deep into the lungs.
As Hopkins writes, “Despite the fact that some of these factory farms release more ammonia than large industrial facilities, the EPA is set to give them free reign to pollute.”
Although the EPA released a report detailing the extent of ammonia releases from animal waste, (opens pdf) it has actually allowed some of those toxic releases to continue. According to News Inferno, the EPA let thousands of factory style farms escape penalties in 2006 in exchange for information about their pollutants. Rather than hold them accountable for foul air and water from excrement, EPA signed agreements with 2,681 animal feeding operations and waved federal fines of $27,000 a day for violations. For EPA, these agreements were the most “efficient way” to get the data that would determine whether animal feeding operations comply with air emission laws.
With the recent, proposed rule change, EPA would only want information on animal waste if it creates an emergency situation. As they write in their press release “EPA is proposing to eliminate these reports for air releases from animal waste at farms because it is unnecessary to respond to such reports.”
But with this proposed rule change, Sierra Club’s Hopkins believes, “There is no way we minimize exposure and protect public health if factory farms are not required to report their emissions.”
Indeed, it seems that this Christmas the EPA has given the crappiest gift of all to corporate owners and the public alike.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.
Comments
For instance, in the agreement signed with farms, EPA got the producers to pay for, and allow data collection to learn what size of farm (if any) would trigger reporting thresholds. The producers didn't have to do that and EPA wouldn't have been able to come up with any useful data for more than a decade without the cooperation of the farmers.
Another instance is the implication emmissions from farms are somehow worse than from some other types of businesses. Did you know that municipal waste water treatment systems also release ammonia and hydrogen sulfide, the same chemicals that farmers are villified for in this article. That is right, every time you flush, you are contribing to air pollution.l
The modern Sierra Club is operated much like any other corporation. Their goal is no longer conservation. Their method is to generate controversy that they can use in convincing urban dwellers to open their wallet to donate. Their goal is government ownership of all the land possible, and government regulation of what ever private land the government doesn't own.
Don't donate to the Sierra Club. The Izzak Walton League is a much more deserving organization.
I wonder if Kisha Lewellyn Schlegel is smart enough to figure out that her poo is almost the same as pig, cow and chicken poo since she eats the same stuff.
New York Institute of Technology
The NYIT is a private coeducational university of higher learning. Founded in 1955, the institute enrolls 10,000 students at its multiple campus centers. The campus is fully accredited by the an accrediting organization recognized by the USDOE. Specific program accreditations include: The NAAB, National Accrediting Agency for Clinical Laboratory Science, The ACFEI, and a number of others. The College offers student undergraduate professionally-oriented programs leading the path to to A.A.S, B.S., and M.B.A degrees.
California College of the Arts
Established to encourage advanced studies, the California College of the Arts offers a intuitive approach to collaborative classes, approaching applicants in a professional range of fields in liberal arts, management, design, and History.
With an institutional population of around 1,500, the organization promotes leading edge resources and operations in a community driven, structured university community. Students are taught from a learned collection of renowned teachers in defined programs, with an average of 18 per class. Faculty advisors, established in allowing puils in finding their institutional experience, are part of a thorough first-semester program.
Drake State University of Rockford, Illinois
Drake was originally formed through the combination of community national efforts. A diverse, collaborating focus is an integral part of all degree programs at Drake State University. Founded to promote professional enrichment and achievement, central to the ideals of Drake is its unique capability to accommodate a great number styles of review through credential assessment, collaborative study and online organization. Throughout its network you will discover a learning community that is active with world class curriculums, professional programs and personal enrichment tools. Drake State University encourages the value of one-to-one relationships which are frequently built amongst the students and faculty. As a result, a great number of students discover the best combo whch allows them to tool the dream of a Drake credential to excel them toward their academic priorities.
Drake State University is operated by a credentialed board of Trustees, each of whom holds a specialized subject of expertise which can help guide the academic philosophy and expanding of the college. In a increasingly competitive work market, DSU has dedicated itself to serve a rapidly growing number of applicants and students across all fields. Its alumni have seen subsequent achievement in the workplace, strengthening its reputation in industry and business.