Western Book Roundup
First Novels Belong in the Basement: Against Self-Publishing
New West Books editor Jenny Shank offers five simple rules for publishing.By Jenny Shank, 4-08-09
![]() |
|
A few months ago, my parents got a letter in the mail from the Center of the American West that said I was invited to a banquet and the organizers wanted to give me some more money for a writing prize I’d won ten years ago. Back then, I was in grad school in Boulder and I was working on my first novel, which I entered in the Center’s first annual Thompson Awards for Western American Writing competition. There was no page limit, so instead of selecting a few chapters, I actually sent the entire manuscript I had at the time, and some poor souls apparently read 250 of my pages and gave me one of the prizes, perhaps as a nod to my audacity.
The Thompson family increased the awards over the last decade and they want to give us early winners more money to make up for the difference, bless them. Extra money for no additional work? Sure, I’ll take it. But I have already earned my reward, because my first novel is sitting in my basement, where it should be.
In fact, let’s make that a rule:
1) Every house should have a first novel in its basement.
It gives the home ballast. It lends the basement the appropriate air of mystery, history, and parental dreams deferred that all basements should have. The longer the book, the better. Epic works of over 400 pages, like mine, really serve to anchor a house.
That’s why the proliferation of self-publishing makes me uneasy. It robs future basements of their unbound novels, hastily stuffed into over-sized manila envelopes. There are lots of options for people looking to self-publish these days—CreateSpace, BookSurge, Lulu. It couldn’t be easier or more convenient. But I suggest that if you can’t find a publisher for your novel, instead of self-publishing, give it to a neighbor who doesn’t have a novel in his basement.
Whatever you do, don’t self-publish and then send the book to me for review.
Blogs are great vehicles for unedited self-expression, as are newsy Christmas letters, and even self-published nonfiction books on overly specific topics, such as the mating habits of Red-winged Blackbirds in Northern Colorado, about which I know a little.
But first novels belong in the basement. There’s got to be something frightening for the children to discover, some reason for them to dare each other to go down there.
I was 21 when I started writing my first novel. Just a kid. I should have been out drinking, but I had grand ambitions. I gave it some awful title derived from a phrase in the Bible. Let’s make that a rule, too:
2) All first novels should have titles derived from the Bible and/or Shakespeare.
The manuscript should be placed in a spot of the basement that’s prone to flooding, because a flood hitting the manuscript on which you wasted your youth is kind of biblical, which goes along with the title. And using a title from the Bible or Shakespeare is also Faulknerian. Everyone starting out of the blocks thinks they’re going to be Faulkner. You’ve got to, or you wouldn’t start at all.
My novel concerned a girl’s high school basketball team in Denver. But it didn’t stop there. I decided to cram the entire modern history of Denver into it, for good measure. I did a lot of research. I went to libraries and looked at newspaper articles on microfilm or microfiche—I get those ancient technologies confused. I ordered dissertations through inter-library loan. There was one dissertation about Denver’s history of busing for racial integration that was so fine I had planned to thank its author on my acknowledgments page. (Don’t mock: you’ve planned out your acknowledgment page, too, or your Oscar acceptance speech or your post-game interview with ESPN or the heartfelt way you’ll thank Terry Gross or Oprah for finally having you on the show.)
I would thank the author of that dissertation here if all of my notes for my first novel hadn’t been lost in the transfer three computers ago. They might be on some ancient storage device that I can no longer access, like a floppy disk, the very name of which brings me a rush of nostalgic glee. Technology’s relentless march is yet another reason why you should print out your first novel, once, and place it in the basement.
Every so often, you’ll be struck by idea that maybe your novel isn’t as bad as you remember. That’s why you’ve got to keep it in the basement, so you can go down there, read a few pages, and disabuse yourself of that notion.
Some first novels are great, and they sail right through the publishing process, into bookstores and touch the hearts of millions. But most first novels belong in the basement. Most of us have to keep writing past the point where we’ve lost all hope to make something happen, to keep writing when you no longer have any time or any reasonable reason to continue doing what you’re doing. The more broken and hopeless you become, the more cynical you get, and cynicism can be funny. Because first novels are written before you’ve really started to fail, they often take themselves too seriously. I say, marinate in your failure until you’re properly cynical because, here comes rule three:
3) Cynicism can be funny. And that will make your second novel better.
Let’s move right along to rule four:
4) If you value your marriage, don’t make your spouse read your first novel.
No good can come of that. If he says, “It’s great, Honey,” you’ll know he’s lying just to avoid upsetting you. If he says, “It needs some work,” you’ll agree with him but silently, you’ll seethe, remembering that one great metaphor you had on page 67.
One last rule:
5) Just because you might have won a prize for your first novel or had a chapter of it published in some journal, that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t stay in the basement.
It’ll feel more comfortable down there in the basement with a few laurels to rest on.
So with my first novel lodged happily in my basement, near the window well that might run over with spring thaw at any moment, I’ll head to the Thompson Award banquet later this month and enjoy myself as I reminisce about the novel of my youth.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.





Comments
Michael
Not only that but you do not mention anywhere your credentials as a expert on the publishing industry and as a writer.
So what am I to conclude. I will reserve my comments on that.
What is important to anyone reading this is that there will always be someone out there that is so believable that one might just take their advice. The newbie novelist is desperate for attention and desires to be the next Hemingway.
What about writing because you like to write? What about talking about the joys you experienced as a writer? Why not talk about the hard work and the idea that writing if taken seriously is a profession with no guarantees of ever getting paid? Why talk about yourself and your prize and then devaluing the very thing that motivated you to continue on in one of the most dreaded hardest professions out there?
Perhaps you can write a post to answer some of my questions as an update or part II to this post where you get to tell us the life of a writer like yourself. Aren't you happy you are a writer and does it not all boil down at the end of the day all a writer wants is to be read?
Kindest,
Michael
Michael P.: as for credentials on the writing and publishing industry, I have none. Except that I read a lot. A couple of books a week. But I am an "expert" in nothing. So don't listen to me, follow your dreams, man.
Great post and great affirmation. Sometimes I feel a bit of guilt about my basement novel--did I give up on it too quickly? And then I remember all of its vehement, heartfelt messages.... ;-D
I didn't feel you were trying to come of as some expert (yet there _is_ wisdom in your humour), or that you were saying we should all wanna be Faulkners. I felt you obviously loved writing and knew the process, but without delusion and with just enough cynicism to make me laugh (and relate!) hard.
>>>But maybe cynicism will help you figure out what sorts of stuff fans of these kinds of books are suckers for, so you can produce that?<<<<
Still laughing.
Have a good day.
and the avoidance of accidentally being read by an innocent bystander who does not deserve the affliction of bad fiction...
Michael
And it's awful.
And you too Jill? The novel-writing plague is more rampant than I'd guessed...
I never really looked at fame as a goal in and of itself. Actually, I prefer semi-seclusion. But I've always wanted to 1)write a complete something, and 2)get published. Since I had so much trouble with a novel, I decided to try my hand at short stories. I see life in vignettes anyway, so it seemed natural.
I wrote 10 very short stories. The shortest is 600 words; the longest is 2,467 and is the only story that tops 2,000 words.
I wanted to give my mother my stories in book form -- with a cover and a spine and pictures and even a bio in the back. Using a 5"x8" unlined note pad of paper, I printed a copy on my computer. I slathered on tacky glue with a baby's toothbrush to bind it together. It took about 2 hours to print, page by page, and about 2 days to completely dry.
I was very proud of my book, so much so that I eventually printed a total of 6 copies. I gave them to family and a couple of friends and facetiously told them they could be collector's items some day.
One friend loved it; she even said she was a bit envious, which is hilarious because she has published several books with honest-to-goodness publishers. She's done well enough to buy a house with a couple of her books. The other friend thanked me but didn't even bother saying they were horseshit.
With the exception of my mother, my family said nothing. My mother never really commented on my writing other than to question my sense of propriety. "I was shocked that you wrote about a woman prostituting herself. Where on earth would you ever get such an idea?"
It's been three-plus years and I still like my stories, even if no one else does.
I love the process of writing, so I haven't given up on my dream of getting published. Maybe if I took up drinking and smoking, maybe my writing would improve. Whadda'ya think?
...
I really enjoyed your story... I laughed out loud.
I look forward to reading your past / future contributions.
I am a musician from Colorado and find this to be true about songwriting too.
If I had a nickel for every song someone has sent me to pitch to someone I used to work for, I'd have a bunch of nickels.
The basement wouldn't be large enough to hold all the rejected songs I've written ... some that I thought were pretty good.
We also have an attic.
Thanks for your insight.
p.s.- I'm working on a story of my life as a sideman musician.... would it be too much to ask, if you had a little time....?
This probably applies to my 1st Book-On-Tape too.