New West Series
From the West, Through the Metal Detectors and Into the Offices of Congress
In this second installment chronicling a trip by concerned sportsmen to Washington, D.C., getting sucked into the machine and office culture of the House and Senate.By Bruce Smithhammer, 3-09-11
![]() |
|
| Members of Sportsman for Responsible Energy Development meet with members of Sen. Jim Risch's staff to discuss development concerns. | |
I empty my pockets of everything, take my jacket and belt off, slide everything through a metal detector, walk through a larger one myself, and I’m in. Standing in the rotunda of one of the Senate office buildings, I’m now on my way to the first meeting of the morning with a representative from the state of Idaho, tagging along with a few other Idaho residents to present the case for responsible energy development.
Other teams from Sportsmen for Responsible Energy Development representing Colorado, Montana, Utah, New Mexico and Arizona are simultaneously doing the same thing. (Read the introductory post on their trip.)
The building is humming with purposeful activity. We crowd into an office and wait our turn. The Congressman’s schedule is overbooked and we will be meeting with one of his staff instead, which becomes a familiar theme throughout our time here. It quickly becomes apparent that these young staff members are the real key to getting anything done here. Every member of Congress is dependent on a cadre of generally young, smart, up-and-coming aides to handle the myriad of responsibilities and commitments that one person alone could never accomplish.
As in every meeting throughout the day, members of our team make it clear from the beginning they are not by any means opposed to energy development – that they only want to be able to have input into the process of where it is appropriate and where it isn’t, and that they hope hunting, fishing and habitat concerns are considered.
They do their best to convey that their position is not an extreme one, but a reasonable middle ground.
While Idaho does not have many of the oil and gas concerns of neighboring states (yet), there are still concerns regarding the impacts of renewable energy on habitat – wind power in particular. The staff member assures us that the Congressman shares these concerns. The staffer is presented with a folder of information about SFRED, along with Idaho-specific information about the hundreds of millions of dollars that hunting, fishing and associated backcountry activities generate for the state, as well as a plea to consider these very real economic benefits in weighing what we are willing to sacrifice for energy development.
So the rest of the day goes, repeating the same message to staff members of one Congressperson after another. Some are obviously merely accommodating, others seem to take a genuine interest. One tells us that he dreams of coming out West and learning to fly fish. Another tells us of a place he’s gone pheasant hunting not far from where I live.
On a few occasions throughout the day, I find myself imagining these meetings from the point of view of the Congressional staffers who are meeting with us.
They are having similar meetings throughout the day, back to back, on a spectrum of issues and concerns brought by other groups with their own agendas. It’s entirely possible that, in the same day, they will be meeting with a group presenting a case for the exact opposite agenda as Sportsmen for Responsible Energy Development. The sheer volume of individuals, organizations and coalitions trying to make their concerns known is hard to believe without being here, in the middle of it. People line the halls outside of Congressional offices, waiting for a chance to make their case.
This is democracy, and in the present age, it seems to run on smart phones and coffee.
But it is also obvious that casting a pall over everything right now is the budget crisis. Everyone is preoccupied with whether an agreement between the two parties can can be reached, with whether they will even be coming to work next week. By comparison to the specter of a government-wide shutdown, our agenda here can seem miniscule, the mission daunting, the issues a world away from the political nexus of the country.
But then I remember that these wild places that can seem so far away to someone in the bustling urban environ of D.C. are my places; that these issues are very real in my region, and that the best wild habitat left in the country can’t be sacrificed or shoved aside in favor of seemingly more pressing, short-sighted matters –- because in many cases, all it takes is having them sacrificed once.
It is our last meeting of the day. We’re all a little spent at this point, but it’s nothing compared to the people who are working in offices all around us, who seem exhausted, and it is only Monday. We sit down with a staffer working for Sen. James Risch, Republican junior senator from Idaho. He is startlingly young-looking, but immediately sharp and conversant on the issues. He looks a little ragged, as many staffers seem to right now, and he reaffirms what we’ve been hearing all day – that the mood is as tense as they’ve ever seen it, that nobody is sure what is going to happen with the Congressional spending battle, that it is affecting everything right now. He tells us we are his 12th meeting that day, but that we are, “a breath of fresh air” because we are the only folks he’s talked today who aren’t asking for any money.
Suddenly, just as the meeting is winding down, Sen. Risch bursts into the office, the only member of Congress we get a chance to talk to all day. He says he really wanted to talk with us, and that unfortunately he only has a few minutes. His questions are to-the-point and savvy, and he appears to have genuine interest in the cause that SFRED is advocating. And then, after a few minutes of talking, he asks if we’d all like a picture with him. I get the feeling that this is a familiar ritual. We take a few pics, shake hands, thank each other for taking the time, and he zips out.
I try to imagine what it would be like to spend every day of my life this way, and I can’t really, but many do in this frenetic engine that drives so many decisions for our country. I want to believe that SFRED has made an impression, and that the message got through. I believe that in at least some cases, they truly did. In others, we’ll have to wait and see. And this is how things happen, or don’t happen, in Washington, D.C.
Bruce Smithhammer is a freelance writer and editor, a columnist for the Teton Valley News and a contributing editor for The Drake magazine. He is also among a group of hunting writers who contribute to the blog Mouthful of Feathers. He’ll be blogging about his D.C. trip for New West in the coming days. Read his first installment, A New Congress, a New Chance to Be Heard on Wildlands.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.





Comments
Registrant:
NWF
1400 16th Street
suite 501
Washington, District of Columbia 20036
United States
Registered through: GoDaddy
Domain Name: SPORTSMEN4RESPONSIBLEENERGY.COM
Created on: 11-Feb-08
Expires on: 11-Feb-12
Last Updated on: 11-Feb-11
Administrative Contact:
I'm just surprised it wasn't Trout Unlimited.
Sportsmen for Responsible Energy Development is spearheaded by the National Wildlife Federation, the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership and Trout Unlimited. They are joined by roughly 500 smaller organizations, small businesses such as outfitters, and sporting goods retailers, and individuals.
What we all have to understand is that all those wonderful NGOs that are in constant sight, appearing before your state's legislature, are headquartered in D.C., and the people that work their have inside access to all the subcommittee and committee staff, daily, and if they think your message is not their message, you will have been torpedoed before you ever got to the Capitol.
D.C. is an "insider" city, and our federal government is an "insider" dominated and run environment. Whichever party controls a legislative arm has party loyalist employees in every job. In the case of the House going to the Republicans in 2010, it meant that all the House committee staff and personnel were changed to Republican loyalists, and perhaps one or two staffers and one attorney for the minority. If you think those committee staffers without jobs after the election leave the City, think again. They just go over to the Administration side of government, and go to work in the agencies the committee they were working for have jurisdiction over. The insider, life long, guaranteed job is there.
In my particular areas of concern, the jobs are held by NGO staffers who freely work for either the Congress, the Administration, or their NGO. The Wilderness Society to Interior to Congressional staff for the Democrats, and back to the NGO, is a familiar path.
For a lifetime, I have heard about Big Business owning government. Well, Big NGO now owns government. That we have seen Paulson as CEO of The Nature Conservancy, Sec of Treasury, and CEO of GoldmanSachs is a pretty good illustration of how Big Environment and Wall Street march hand in hand. That is why Weyerhaeuser, and the other Timberland Bigs, shaped policy to get the small mills out of our economy and competing with Weyerhaeuser. Have Big Environment cut off the supply of public timber, the logs from which supplied those small, very competitive sawmillers. Protect the publicly traded companies, the public employee retirement investments, and elect Democrats. Too bad Barney Frank and Chris Dood so screwed it all up with the liar loan banking fiasco. At least GoldmanSachs was able to make a many billions by shorting the loan package business.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions, and GoldmanSachs will be trading in asphalt, aggregate, and cement. Meanwhile, your grass roots appeals to congressmen and senators is window dressing for future campaigns, and they are using Congressional lipstick to tart up the pigs, which is what you are in their world, where sincerity is an oxymoron. It is all about money, your money in their accounts.
I'm sorry, but I can only hunt for five weeks a year at best, only if I do so well the other 47 weeks that I can take the time.
The fact of the matter is, when the "roadless initiative" happened, with millions in Pew money passed through Audubon to various and sundry, the main failing was there was no hock-and-bullet support.
Pew's minions are well-paid because they are smart political operators. They realized their great failing, and began to fund "hunter and angler" organizations through Trout Unlimited, which in turn created and fiscally sponsored the "Theodore Roooooooooosevelt Conservation Alliance."
If they can chiz off the twenty percent of "purist" sportsmen (Doug Peacock's guess), the few liberals with guns, and fund them well, and create the proper illusion within the beltway with the help of useful idiots (and I don't think you're an idiot, you are probably fully aware), they get what they want -- which might not be that good for hunting or fishing in the long run, never mind the larger society.
Consider what happens if your faction "wins" and the other 80 percent leave the game. Wow, what a lonely world, in which you have to grovellingly apologize just to keep the dregs of the experience.
To be honest, my personal experience bears little in common with your Pew conspiracy theory. The hunters and anglers that I know, and who are involved in wanting to preserve habitat so that they can continue to purse the things they love to do, come from ALL OVER the political spectrum, and could never be pigeonholed as "mere purists and liberals."
These folks are doing what they do because they love to hunt and fish, and because they know that the single best way to protect healthy, viable populations of game animals is to protect habitat. It really is that simple. There is no secret agenda beyond that.
You want to know what really boggles me? The people who claim to be avid hunters and anglers who DON'T support these efforts. There was a time when being a hunter and/or angler and being a conservationist went hand in hand for simple, obvious reasons. It's too bad that such a political wedge has been driven into the heart of the debate, and turned so many who depend on wilderness away from protecting it. It's time we move beyond that, and realize it for the partisan trickery that it is.
I don't really care if you or anyone else is a liberal, conservative, independent, whatever. I don't. All I care about is making sure that we continue to have large tracts of wild land that sustain healthy populations, so that we can continue to hunt and fish and have a personal connection to all that such includes. That's it, and while I can't presume to speak for anyone else, I think I can pretty fairly say that this is the same straightforward sentiment that drives everyone else I know who is involved with this.
Thanks for going to DC and reporting on this. Sportsmen need intact habitat and robust populations of game and fish to pass on to our kids if we expect hunting and fishing to survive.
Dave,
I'm sure Exxon will look out for your interests better than TU and NWF.
Making an agency self sufficient might work, except inflation and collective bargaining with public employees has put too much pressure on the resource and public costs, higher charges are the only way to increase income, and higher priced licenses go unsold. There is the law of diminishing returns.
When the best hunting is on private lands with private land game management (e.g. the landowner sets a maximun number of hunters per season or year), the public is not involved. The landed and the privileged hunt and the hoi poloi are crowded onto a smaller slice of land, with less game and less opportunity to take an animal. They are being asked to support public employees but with little chance of success in their filling a tag.
Socialism and the Commons sooner or later produce too few animals for too many seekers. There have to be limits. Large private landowners know that limits are the path to success, and have been staying within self set limit parameters for a long time. They have high annual success rates and see more game.
I firmly believe that there are fish and game management agencies that manage the resource not for hunters and fishers, but for the income to feed their bureaucracy. They sell tags that don't have an animal to fill that tag. People hunt diligently and see no animals. Ghost animals sought by possessors of tags with no redemption possibility or at the least, extremely low odds of success. They are unwitting pawns in a socialist ponzi for benefit to the public employees of fish and game management. Game management funded by contingency fees is a bad, bad idea. If you don't like ambulance chasing lawyers, class action lawsuits, you shouldn't like license, tag and excise taxes funding game management as long as any and all management decisions can be and are litigated by the few, and the ability to grow the business is limited or non existent.
On the other side of the coin, having all that money generated by "users" go into the State General fund to be highjacked by wanton spending educators, welfare proponents, and other nanny state activities, will almost guarantee that wildlife will never have an adequate budget. And the legislators will raise the fees beyond affordability, after they give themselves another raise.
Perhaps it is best that hunting and fishing sort of fade away, like MacArthur's "old soldier" in his West Point swan song. I have seen what has happened to ocean fishing and the pressure on salmon. Aluminum and fiberglass boats, dependable power systems, radar, gps, fish finders, sophisticated radios and satellite cell phones, a responsive rescue system, the ability to get on fish and stay on fish, are all technology dependent systems, and result in even fumbling dorks being able to be competent fishers. No compass reading in the black fog, no guess by currents as to where you are, no communication ability, no seamanship skills, and no way to stay on fish except by guess and by golly. People catch many more fish per hour of effort today. And you can say the same about hunting. All the same tech gear is available, and maybe more. The effort is amplified by technology, and no end to adding habitat will slow down the technology gains and advantages. Too many hunters for too few game, driven by the need to sell too many tags to too many licensed hunters, all to feed the bureaucracy of game management. Of fish management. Money not only drives the rich guys' success, but the continuation of the bureaucracy of fish and game. And that in turn drives a huge supply chain to the hunters and fishers, a supply chain of technology.
The issue is an arms race in hunting and fishing recreation. The critters can't support the current level of effort.
In Oregon, where I live, there is a hunting season on elk in most game units that begins in mid August and does not end until mid November, and in coastal areas, the end of March. All a carefully scripted dance of filling areas with revenue generating hunters. It is ugly, really. And all so shallow.
If you really read deeply, you find out elk can live hotter and colder than mule deer. So mulies are temperature and forage sensitive, and elk out compete them on the range. Whitetails will live in the bottoms, and feed with the cattle at night, and hide in the bottoms during the day.
The economics of the range favor cattle. It once favored sheep, and the deer herds grew accordingly. Now feral horses and cows are there, not pruning brush and forbs. Therefore, fewer deer every year.
Read the old timer journals, diaries, and accounts of game wardens, USFS game counters, and you will see there was once not many mulies, and then they were many, and after the US general populace got mutton poisoned during WWII, and the advent of synthetic fabrics, sheep lost favor for cows, and the range gradually was changed into cow, elk, and speed goat feed.
My lifetime observation. I am not a biologist. I don't claim to have anything but an eye for the changes that I have seen. No new bitterbrush canes. Less and less winter fat. Range fires taking out chicken sage. Cheat grass behind the fires. No new mountain mahogany seedlings, and the elk having the copses and pockets lined to higher than deer can eat off their hind legs. In some areas, the BLM is cutting all the junipers, and that is putting water back into springs and seeps. A band of sheep now and then would do wonders for mule deer chances.