New West Bulletin Board
Growth of Montana’s Wolf Population Slows in 2009
By Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Guest Writer, 3-12-10
![]() |
|
The following is a press release the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Department and is part of NewWest.Net’s bulletin board, which offers press releases with a wide variety of views and news about the West.
At least 525 wolves inhabit Montana according to the 2009 annual wolf conservation and management report released today by Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks.
FWP’s report, which is available online at fwp.mt.gov, shows Montana’s minimum wolf population increased about 4 percent in 2009, compared to an 18 percent increase in 2008.
The minimum Montana wolf population counts include 525 wolves, in 101 verified packs, and 37 breeding pairs. Montana’s minimum pack count and number of breeding pairs increased slightly from 2008.
“The combination of a conservative harvest by hunters, agency control and other mortality sources did not curtail population growth,” said FWP Director Joe Maurier.
Compared to Idaho and Wyoming, at 28 percent Montana had the highest rate of known human-caused mortality of wolves. Officials surmised that’s due to Montana’s wolf population, as a whole, living on a combination of public and private lands. Nonetheless, Montana’s population still increased and remains well above recovery goals.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service delisted the northern Rocky Mountain’s gray wolves in Montana, Idaho and parts of Washington, Utah and Oregon, but not in Wyoming, about a year ago. The decision is being challenged in Missoula federal court by several groups seeking to reinstate federal endangered species protections throughout the region.
The minimum recovery goal for wolves in the northern Rocky Mountains was set at a minimum of 30 breeding pairs--successfully reproducing wolf packs--and a minimum of 300 individual wolves for at least three consecutive years and well distributed throughout the recovery area. The goal was achieved in 2002, and the wolf population has increased every year since.
FWP’s report is part of the annual federal recovery update required by USFWS. The end of 2009 count also estimates that at least 320 wolves inhabited Wyoming and at least 843 wolves inhabited Idaho. Annual reports from Idaho, Wyoming, and information about wolves in Yellowstone National Park and the northern Rockies as a whole are available online at http://westerngraywolf.fws.gov.
The northern Rockies’ “metapopulation” is comprised of wolf populations in Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming. Three packs are now verified in Oregon and Washington. Today, at least 1,706 wolves in 242 packs, with about 115 breeding pairs, live in the region, where wolves can travel about freely to join existing packs or form new packs. This, combined with wolf populations in Canada and Alaska, assures genetic diversity.
Most of the increases in Montana’s wolf population occurred in the northwest’s Wolf Management Unit 1where the population grew to 308 wolves, in 64 verified packs, and 23 breeding pairs. Seven of the packs reside on reservations where they are managed by Tribal authorities.
In western Montana’s WMU 2, the minimum counts were similar to previous years--at least 110 wolves in 20 packs, and five breeding pairs. In southwestern Montana’s WMU 3, minimum wolf counts showed a slight decline from 2008 to at least 106 wolves in 17 packs, and nine breeding pairs. Lethal control and decreased immigration from Yellowstone National Park may explain the population leveling off over the past few years.
“The rate of population growth continues to slow because the best habitats already have resident wolf packs,” said Maurier said.
About 23 packs occur along Montana’s border with Idaho, 14 of which are included in the Montana estimate. This demonstrates the continued influence of the robust wolf population in Idaho on Montana’s wolf population.
The recovery of the wolf in the northern Rockies remains one of the fastest endangered species comebacks on record. In the mid 1990s, to hasten the overall pace of wolf recovery in the Northern Rockies, 66 wolves were released into Yellowstone National Park and central Idaho.
“Nearly all of Montana’s wolves live outside national parks, which also means more intensive management is needed to strike the right balance between wolves and public acceptance,” Maurier said. “It’s very clear that Montana has made room for wolves.”
Last year, Montana created a wolf hunt for the first time. Hunters harvested 72 wolves between Sept. 15 and Nov. 16. As hunters approached the overall harvest quota of 75 wolves, FWP closed the hunt about two week before the general season was scheduled to end to ensure the quota would not be exceeded. In May, FWP will propose regulations, and most likely a higher harvest quota, for the 2010 wolf season.
Livestock depredations and response up in 2009
Despite the hunt--and with the increase in wolf depredation responses by FWP-- wolf recovery continues to be accompanied by increases in both the number of livestock killed by wolves and the number of wolves killed to resolve conflicts, as chronicled in the latest report. Of the 255 wolf deaths documented in 2009, 145 were related to livestock depredations, 16 were illegal kills, and vehicles or trains struck eight. Others died from a variety of causes common to all wildlife species, including poor health and old age.
Still, Maurier said the Montana wolf population grew by adding at least 166 new pups by the end of December and by establishing at least 26 new packs in 2009.
Cattle deaths confirmed by USDA Wildlife Services in Montana increased from 77 in 2007 to 97 in 2009, and confirmed sheep death losses nearly doubled from 111 to 202. About 38 percent of Montana wolf packs were confirmed to have killed livestock. Three wolf packs and lone wolves were responsible for nearly all confirmed sheep losses. Four llamas, two goats, and four dogs were also confirmed killed by wolves. Additional losses and injuries occurred, but either could not be verified or were determined to be “probable” wolf kills.
Maurier noted that of 145 wolves that were killed to prevent further depredations, private citizens killed 10 wolves caught chasing or attacking livestock. He said a variety of proactive nonlethal tools were also employed in cooperation with landowners to reduce the risk of loss. For example, FWP again collaborated in several range-rider projects and provided fladry--cloth or plastic flags that are attached to wire that can deter wolves from approaching an area--to numerous private landowners.
FWP has led wolf management under the federal guidelines since 2004. Delisting allows Montana to manage wolves in a manner similar to how bears, mountain lions and other wildlife species are managed, guided by state management plans, administrative rules, and laws.
To learn more about Montana’s wolf population, visit FWP online at fwp.mt.gov/wolf. Click Montana Wolves.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.





Comments
If there are more wolves in Montana than last year, and more wolves are showing up in other states and Canada, then even with more wolf mortality due to their predicted behavior of turning to livestock to supplement wildlife as a food source, wolves are more abundant than the Montana census would indicate. I just want to know when they will be introduced into California. Half of California is public lands. That state needs wolves to control the cougar and coyote populations, and to give credence and value to the millions of acres of National Parks and wilderness areas, and vast areas of public land off limits to any resource use.
Nevada needs wolves to control feral horses. Golly, so many states need wolves to control feral horses. In a faltering economy that favors public employees (reading yesterday that the 7 counties in the USA with the highest per capita incomes surround Washington DC), and has put tens of millions of people out of work, the money to feed a horse has dried up. This country has twice as many horses today as it did in 1910, and no place to put an unwanted horse (people are now dumping them on public lands like they have their dogs and cats on farmland forever) or even turn excess horses into food. We need wolves to learn how to hunt horses and eat them. Right now!! Send wolves to Harry Reid, the Conservationist. Save the American horse habitat by having wolves making it honest once again!!!
Utah need wolves just because Utah needs to share in the experience, along with Colorado, New Mexico and Arizona. And maybe some of those stud MacKenzie wolves will impregnate those wimpy Mexican red wolves and put some decent genes into that coyote and domestic dog gene pool being passed off as the pure quill. Or maybe just eat them just to make a statement about entitlements and welfare wolfing.
If one wolf is good for Montana, then they should be good for all of the US. And while they are at it, California, the home of the Golden Bears of Cal, the Bruins of UCLA, is only a charade and false fronted illusion without grizzly bears. A pointed, needed, reintroduction of grizzly bears to California is the only way to make the West whole again, disperse the bears and have connectivity to habitats, and a more diverse gene pool. A totally protected reintroduction that keeps people out of the grizzly habitat by regulation, until the population is self sustaining and robust. Those 35 million people of California need to walk their talk. There must be good for the goose, as there has been good for the gander.
Or, change the mascot names that are now but a reminder of the purposeful extinction of a species in their state. The UCLA Weasels. That would recognize their humble graduate and now football coach, Rick New Weasel, whose tracks can be followed by the wreckage of football programs along his life path. The Golden Carp of the U of California Berkley, which would reflect the student body of today and their dedication to a vegetarian diet like that of a carp. Nothing has to happen in Nevada. The U of Nevada is already called the Wolfpack. Now they need real wolves to make it real. And a visiting Grizzly might not be a bad idea.
Montana has Grizzlies. Montana State has Bobcats. Oregon has Ducks (some in court today). Oregon State still has lots of Beavers (and some guys, too). WSU has Cougars. Seattle (YewDubYew) has Huskies. Stanford is still undecided about what a politically correct mascot should be. I can certainly see a trail of Trojans across the USC campus. Or at least wrapper evidence. There is no doubt about Sun Devils or Wildcats in Arizona. The empty shirts are at Cal and UCLA. The issue should be grizzly reintroduction or new mascot names. They cannot live this lie any longer.
When a few government employees are killed by wolves while working in Idaho and Montana, you will see a little more care taken to count them properly and deal with them properly (moe hunting).
Having come face to face with a huge single wolf in the wild and seen it not back down ( I was in a truck), I believe they are very capable to killing and eating humans. By the way, the autopsy in Alaska showed the teacher died by wolf (wolves)
The Feds brought in the MacKinzie Valley Wolf (Canis lupus occidentalis) to replace the 30% smaller Rocky Mountain Wolf (Canis Lupus irremotus). They violated the Endangered Species Act when they brought these diseased EXPERIMENTAL wolves.