Over the Horizon Line | Column By Hal Rothman
Want Political Backfire? Screw With the American Vacation
By Hal Rothman, 4-25-06
The current attempt by the Bush administration to cut the National Park Service operating budget by 20% is only the latest in a shameless series of efforts to gut the most beloved institution in American society. An administration that has taken pride in ignoring popular opinion now offers a gratuitous slashing that cuts at something Americans regard as a birthright. If you really want to piss off the public, mess with their vacations. "So what if the public's experience is affected?" these beltway divas are telling each other. "They won't be voting for us again."
Only six months ago, political hacks in the Department of the Interior tried to use administrative rules to shred nearly century-old protections of the nation's most cherished places. The public objected and they failed; now they are back, seeking to use a different kind of power to unravel some of the few remaining common bonds in our society.
I suspect that this too will backfire. National parks are one of the very few things Americans consistently point to as a visible symbol of their national identity. In their almost century and one-half of existence, the parks have been a crucial dimension of the glue that has bound Americans together as a nation.
Even more, the National Park Service, the agency charged with managing national park areas since its establishment in 1916, has consistently been rated the most loved federal agency by the American public. The keepers of the nation’s sacred landscapes and treasured historic places connect with a public that is starved for meaning in a shallow age.
Even in a changing America, national parks retain tremendous psychic power. Created to forge a vision of what was special about the American nation-and not incidentally, to illustrate the differences between American nature and European culture-they remain icons that bind us together. Especially when you stand amid the parade of tour buses at Mather Point at the Grand Canyon, watching the Japanese disembark en masse, or join the constant stream of people to Old Faithful, you know who you are.
That has been the gift of the national parks. It is not the nature and the history preserved within that defines us, although that nature is often stunning and the history moving. The idea of the national parks is even more important than what they contain.
Especially in the West, national parks have become cornerstones of state and regional economies. From Montana to New Mexico, California to Colorado, every state counts on the jobs national park visitation creates and the dollars it brings in. I would hate to try to balance my state budget in the interior West without that revenue.
Economic arguments aside, if there is a greater American contribution to the application of the principles of democracy, I can not imagine it. Before the eighteenth century, when people like you and I first got the individual rights we now take for granted, the idea of a public park didn't exist.
In Europe, everything belonged to somebody. Robert of Locksley, who we know as Robin Hood, happened along and saw the Sheriff of Nottingham and his men arresting a man who killed a deer to feed his family inside the King’s private reserve. The King’s lands and animals were private, hunted only if the monarch allowed. All of it belonged to the liege. Robert objected, stove in the head of one of the minions, and found himself an outlaw.
Not here. National parks define the difference between the United States, full of land and promise, and hidebound Europe, where centuries of privilege weighed heavy on the backs of all but the nobility. Never mind that for a long time, their democracy was more symbol than reality. Until after World War II, only affluent Americans could easily visit their parks.
Since then, the democratization of travel has made the national park experience available to the vast majority of Americans. Although minorities and immigrants are still under-represented among park visitors, the park system received more than 388 million visits last year. That's a lot of people.
So this summer, when you visit the national parks, be sure to let your congressional representatives know what you thought about the reduction in service that this administration arbitrarily caused. I'm sure they will want to hear from you, especially with elections this fall. If the institution of the national park is important, the public needs to come to its rescue.
Hal K. Rothman is Professor and Barrick Distinguished Scholar at the Department of History at the University of Nevada-Las Vegas. Considered the one of the nation’s leading expert on tourism, travel, and post-industrial economies, he is the award-winning author of countless books, including the widely acclaimed Neon Metropolis: How Las Vegas Started the 21st Century (2002), Devil’s Bargains: Tourism in the Twentieth Century American West, (1998 ), Saving the Planet: The American Response to the Environment in the Twentieth Century (2000), which received the 1999 Western Writers of America Spur Award for Contemporary Nonfiction, and many others.
Like this story? Get more! Sign up for our free newsletters.




Comments
For example, Yellowstone recently celebrated the news that it will receive $15 million from the Yellowstone Foundation and $11 million for the federal government for a 33,000 square-foot Old Faithful Visitor Education Center, yet there’s nothing in the budget for additional staffing.
A few years hence, I can well imagine tourists from New Jersey walking into the newly built center, only to find an overwhelmed, solitary ranger at the front desk, fielding questions from dozens of visitors at once.
Worst case scenario, imagine the visitor walking in and calling out, "Helloooooo? Anyone here?"
I see increasing credibility among those who see an extreme libertarian philosophy at work in all the public land agencies. Led by Lynne Scarlett, former REASON editor and now acting Interior secretary, these extremists seek the commercialization and privatization of recreation on public lands.
Their allies can be found in the membership of the American Recreation Coalition and the backers of the Property and Environment Research Center (PERC), who'd like to see public recreation and public lands in private hands -- Disney for example.
Budget cuts and political machinations in DC, coupled with outsource proposals combine to create poor morale and a seige mentality among the professionals who staff parks, forests, range and wildlife preserves.
Increasingly, because of political pressure and retribution, the only straight talk you can get about these agencies is from retiree organizations like the Coalition of NPS Retirees or from whistle-blower groups like PEER. Public affairs staff for these agencies are tasked with defending the indefensible and putting a positive spin on a drum beat of bad news. Many are hanging on by their fingernails, hoping for a political shift in DC that will restore scientific integrity, budgets and public service values.
Hal, of all people, should realize that current trends in tourism, and park visitation specifically, is toward more consumptive levels of recreation. this includes more public demand for "hard" amenities as well as shopping, parking, etc. It seems to me that the public would in fact be very tolerant of more fee for service schemes - demand for park services must be very elastic given that the given percentage of in-park costs as part of the cost of a vacation is small.
Until there is leadership that rekindles our imagination for our national park system you can count on further erosion of the parks and the experience. Bush administration support for a noncreative brokering of the snowmobile issue in YS is an example.
My homepage | Cool site
My homepage | Please visit
http://kqnqhzoo.com/rpkf/teix.html | http://nxrwfwun.com/casv/javg.html